Image Quality and Framebuffer Speculations for WIP/alpha/beta/E3 games *Read the first post*
- Thread starter Farid
- Start date
Is it camera motion blur
No, it's animation/movement based motion blur as far as I know, but it does seem to affect everything to some extent and neither the camera nor the characters are ever standing completely still at any time. So I was just wondering if that had an effect. There are demos online somewhere, I'll see.
Check 0:58 in this:
Going by the E3 showing, I think Iron Tiger mentioned almost complete lack of any motion blur on the 360 version (that was a while ago).
The arcade version of the updated Bloodline Rebellion was sub-HD compared to the original version, so it should be interesting to see if the home versions were improved at all. Especially the PS3 one since the arcade version used the same hardware.
Btw, what the vertical resolution of the some of the stuff mentioned? (585 and 768)
Is there a visual difference between the arcade version of T6 & Bloodline Rebellion ?
If yes then what kind of differences ?
If yes then what kind of differences ?
There were some noticeable frame rate drops and the image quality wasn't as good with more aliasing. The full motion blur added an overall touch of polish that made the update look and feel smoother gameplay wise.
Maybe I spoke too soon in assuming that BR was sub-HD and I could've been thrown off by the motion blur. The frame rate was consistent too.
On a side note, going by the E3 impressions, SD Tekken noted that a momentary dip in the frame rate in the arcade version (when the floor is destroyed and you switch arenas) were absent in the 360 build but intact in the PS3 one.
what about this
http://www.gamereactor.se/media/19/tekken6tekken_191957b.jpg
King seems to be smoother on PS3, especially the tail, but could be because its in a slightly different angle.
http://www.gamereactor.se/media/19/tekken6tekken_191957b.jpg
King seems to be smoother on PS3, especially the tail, but could be because its in a slightly different angle.
COPS N RAPPERS
Regular
They both look just about the same horrible, if these even are the two console versions....i don't see any indication of which is which.
I don't understand, why couldn't they just use the soul calibur4 engine?
.....the models, hair and detail was over all better in that game.
I don't understand, why couldn't they just use the soul calibur4 engine?
.....the models, hair and detail was over all better in that game.
MazingerDUDE
Regular
That's certainly interesting. I would've figured both would share the same res and only the 360 would have 2X MSAA.
As long as there isn't any double scaling like SCIV, it's all good. The game looks really great in motion.
The original was 720p no AA, but the Bloodline Rebellion version that the console versions are based on was sub-HD going by the resolution of the PS3 version (same hardware).
thought the earlier analysis for Bloodline Rebellion for the arcade was 1024X768 like MGS4 before they even show any 360 media. Could it be that they rather go with a smoother graphics than a sharper IQ for PS3? Guess we have to see both in motion to see the quality especially the motion blur.
(((interference)))
Veteran
Has anyone ascertained the AA setup in Forza 3 yet? Is gameplay still 720p 2xMSAA or have they bumped it up to 4x?
(((interference)))
Veteran
You do not do things like post processing 'in' the edram, you resolve the image to main memory and use it as source texture for the blur.
Last edited by a moderator:
