HD-DVD on xbox360 bad?

MechanizedDeath at least form a good arguement . All your points are out right flames and can just as easly be turned on sony . And no dispite what you think sony doesn't have a lock on any market and can easily loose ground or be over taken in all of them by ms . Just as easly as sony over took nintendo .

Toshiba will make more than enough money off a possible xbox 360 deal. You have millions more players on the market . You have advertising tie ins , you have movie sale royalitys , you have disc production royalitys .

All of these thigns are why sony wants bluray in the ps3 . Not because its going to help games. But becaue even if they have to loose hundreds of millions they are going to make money in the long run. That is unless of course ms and toshiba stop that . Thus any move either can make to better position themselves will happen . Evne if it means toshiba loosing money per hd-dvd drive in the x360 at the start. If its good enough for sony to loose money on each bluray drive at start then its good enough for toshiba . Unless of course you have double standards . Which your post clearly suggests that you do
 
jvd said:
MechanizedDeath at least form a good arguement . All your points are out right flames and can just as easly be turned on sony . And no dispite what you think sony doesn't have a lock on any market and can easily loose ground or be over taken in all of them by ms . Just as easly as sony over took nintendo .

Toshiba will make more than enough money off a possible xbox 360 deal. You have millions more players on the market . You have advertising tie ins , you have movie sale royalitys , you have disc production royalitys .

All of these thigns are why sony wants bluray in the ps3 . Not because its going to help games. But becaue even if they have to loose hundreds of millions they are going to make money in the long run. That is unless of course ms and toshiba stop that . Thus any move either can make to better position themselves will happen . Evne if it means toshiba loosing money per hd-dvd drive in the x360 at the start. If its good enough for sony to loose money on each bluray drive at start then its good enough for toshiba . Unless of course you have double standards . Which your post clearly suggests that you do

I think what mechanizeddeath meant was that because Sony has movie studios and games coming out on BR (Sony pictures, Columbia, and recently purchased MGM, etc), they have more invested interest and higher possible ROI on a format because they produce content as well. Meanwhile Toshiba has no content to gain from first hand, only the royalties to make up for it -- so they aren't necessarily in a position to make zero profit off an HD-DVD drive just to further the format (which would actually benefit the other companies that produce HD-DVD stuff more since they would gain from Toshiba's tactics and would have had to pay nothing). Sony is more likely to take a hit on BR drives because they have lots to gain from it, personally (movie sales and royalties) -- Toshiba doesn't have anything to gain outside of royalties and a new product to start shipping. Now, if Toshiba and all the other HD-DVD companies in the consortium got together and chipped in a bunch of cash to make the drives and gave MS a good deal, that'd be a different story -- who knows, this could happen.

They seemed like fairly valid arguments to me, at least some of them.
 
First of all Toshiba does get royalties from HD DVD.

Second if you think Toshiba cannot make a cheaper HD DVD-ROM drive than SONY can a BD-ROM drive then you're SADLY mistaken. When was the last time you saw a retail $35 DVD slim drive from SONY? Considering HD DVD drives are almost exactly the same as DVD drives other than the laser, Toshiba/Samsung isn't going to have much trouble at all supplying them at cost.
 
I don´t really buy the storage advantage BR has over DVD and how this will affect games.

For starters, developers are crying about how expensive it will be to make next gen games. In what way will BR help developers with this? If next gen games will be more expensive, then you can forget about filling a BR-disc anytime soon.

The enchant ARM comment about that filling everyhting in a single dvd will be tough is also a bit strange. Eastern developers tend to fill the games with FMV and those take place. If they are at 720p, then they will take more place.

NOw, two things.
1. Oblivion seems to be the much much bigger game of the two and we haven´t heard Bethesda bitch about DVD-storage and how tough it is (50+ hour game, voice-sample, HUGE world, awesome gfx)

2. IIRC, didn´t Terminator2 fit in a dvd, in HD-format using MS latest compression technics? I mean, if a 2 hour movie can fit in a dvd, what is the problem of fitting several shorter clips in the same format, using compression?

anyway, back to the BR comments. I don´t think that we will see someone filling a BR disc anytime soon, unless it is SquareEnix with FF27 and their 10 hours of FMV they always must pack in.

Once again, Oblivion is a huge game, which seems to fit nicely in a DVD-format...

Ohh yeah, the whole HD-DVD/BR debacle is such an absurdity. Why don´t we skip these two and wait a bit longer for the HVD, which is a better tech is slated for consumer market in 2007?`
 
2. IIRC, didn´t Terminator2 fit in a dvd, in HD-format using MS latest compression technics? I mean, if a 2 hour movie can fit in a dvd, what is the problem of fitting several shorter clips in the same format, using compression?

Some interesting facts. T2EE, the movie itself only took about 5GBs, is 2.5 hrs long, and is higher resolution than 720p.
Ohh yeah, the whole HD-DVD/BR debacle is such an absurdity. Why don´t we skip these two and wait a bit longer for the HVD, which is a better tech is slated for consumer market in 2007?

Well HVD is backwards compatible with HD DVD so there's no reason to skip HD DVD movies at this point.
 
Some interesting facts. T2EE, the movie itself only took about 5GBs, is 2.5 hrs long, and is higher resolution than 720p.

Well, even better then.. :D

Well HVD is backwards compatible with HD DVD so there's no reason to skip HD DVD movies at this point.

So this gives HD-DVD some edge over BR. The irony here is that both Sony and Toshiba supports HVD. I believe that DVDs still can hold its own until HVD is out on market...
 
jvd said:
MechanizedDeath at least form a good arguement . All your points are out right flames and can just as easly be turned on sony . And no dispite what you think sony doesn't have a lock on any market and can easily loose ground or be over taken in all of them by ms . Just as easly as sony over took nintendo .

Toshiba will make more than enough money off a possible xbox 360 deal. You have millions more players on the market . You have advertising tie ins , you have movie sale royalitys , you have disc production royalitys .

All of these thigns are why sony wants bluray in the ps3 . Not because its going to help games. But becaue even if they have to loose hundreds of millions they are going to make money in the long run. That is unless of course ms and toshiba stop that . Thus any move either can make to better position themselves will happen . Evne if it means toshiba loosing money per hd-dvd drive in the x360 at the start. If its good enough for sony to loose money on each bluray drive at start then its good enough for toshiba . Unless of course you have double standards . Which your post clearly suggests that you do

WOW! If you think I'm flaming someone, let me know. I don't think I'm flaming any person, or company. I'll just leave it at that.

Bobbler might have explained my point better for you. I don't see how this deal would work to Toshiba's advantage in the least. They would be taking a net loss to build a userbase. A userbase that doesn't pay them back in any way, except maybe off HD-DVD royalties, if they make any. Sony, OTOH, doesn't need BD to even become a standard to make money. It's just a storage medium and drive in their system. Their profits will come from game sales, period. They'll take a loss selling the hardware, but the return comes straight to them when they get the software royalties. What's Toshiba getting back from MS? They'd need a slice of the game sales or something to justify the investment. They are a hardware company who's hardware doesn't provide any proprietary software. That's my point. I'm not bashing anyone. PEACE.
 
MechanizedDeath said:
WOW! If you think I'm flaming someone, let me know.

I think he was referring to this :D

MechanizedDeath said:
when the 360 isn't even a guaranteed success? At least Sony has two territories on lockdown, Japan and EU. They're guaranteed a large demand, at least overseas. The 360 is such an unknown that tying themselves into a losing contract with a machine that could well flop wouldn't serve them any good, short-term or long-term.

With Xbox1 and LIVE and the software support already established for X360 and the launch window beating Sony to the table, I do not see how anyone could make such a statement with a straight face. I'm not bashing though.
 
Tap In said:
I think he was referring to this :D



With Xbox1 and LIVE and the software support already established for X360 and the launch window beating Sony to the table, I do not see how anyone could make such a statement with a straight face. I'm not bashing though.

Oh, I don't see the flame in that at all. And I could swap PS3 for X360 and say the same thing. The reasoning is that Sony releasing a flop hurts them and only them. The PS3 is their system. Toshiba giving drives to MS and having that platform flop hits MS and Toshiba, but hits Toshiba worse since they don't recoup any of that loss. Sony at least cushions the blow with software royalties. Toshiba won't see that unless MS gives them a slice of the royalties. That's why I mentioned that bit as a stipulation. There has to be some incentive for Toshiba in order to make this a smart investment...or at least a less-risky one.

It seems to me that the HD-DVD in 360 argument is a very gaming-centric one. One where people look at the 360 as the game machine they want and project their desires onto it without considering what's in it for the drive vendor, Toshiba. An MS success helps them build userbase, but still loses them money. A MS flop just loses them money. They lose money flat-out either way. The collateral gains are just that, collateral. Sony makes money off the disc royalties and movies and all that too, but we look at this from the gaming side, ignoring the movie/film side completely. From the gaming side, what's Toshiba gaining? POTENTIAL userbase at the expense seems risky, especially since they'll have to guarantee a certain number of units, which means a guaranteed loss of cost * contracted units. It just seems silly. The timetable's all wrong for this kind of deal, and it would seem a much better decision for Toshiba to just go ahead and push for unification. Their business model relies on them selling CE hardware, not providing units at a loss for a peripheral entertainment market. Game consoles aren't guaranteed to provide substantial movie sales. Otherwise the importance of BD in the PS3 would/should be met with much less skepticism.

Let me know if this is totally off-base. I just can't put the numbers together for this to make any sense at all. PEACE.
 
There's actually a possibility that Sony will have to abandon Blu-Ray in PS3. Especially if MS decides to go with DVD-9 and the X360 does well. They really can't afford to get into a cost war with MS this time IMO.
 
to mechdeath....

I see what you are saying and I just don't see how the X360 or PS3 can "flop" this gen.

I believe we need to see this as a given just by evaluating the positioning (current marketplace, new hardware and the software support) of the two systems at this time. I certainly do not expect the same result as the current gen. MS will most assuredly close the gap to some degree.

Now with that said, I would not expect such a deal from Toshiba. Maybe, maybe, a discounted drive based on pushing the format but not free.

I also do not think the BR drive nor the HD-DVD will make an impact on either system for at least two years when the HD format is more widely adopted. This is certainly not the same timing as adding DVD to the PS2 was in relation to the marketplace. Having DVD as an "add-in" when DVD players were just starting to catch on fire was a great catapult. The HD drives seem to be at least two years away from that point.
 
MechanizedDeath said:
Oh, I don't see the flame in that at all. And I could swap PS3 for X360 and say the same thing. The reasoning is that Sony releasing a flop hurts them and only them. The PS3 is their system. Toshiba giving drives to MS and having that platform flop hits MS and Toshiba, but hits Toshiba worse since they don't recoup any of that loss. Sony at least cushions the blow with software royalties. Toshiba won't see that unless MS gives them a slice of the royalties. That's why I mentioned that bit as a stipulation. There has to be some incentive for Toshiba in order to make this a smart investment...or at least a less-risky one.

It seems to me that the HD-DVD in 360 argument is a very gaming-centric one. One where people look at the 360 as the game machine they want and project their desires onto it without considering what's in it for the drive vendor, Toshiba. An MS success helps them build userbase, but still loses them money. A MS flop just loses them money. They lose money flat-out either way. The collateral gains are just that, collateral. Sony makes money off the disc royalties and movies and all that too, but we look at this from the gaming side, ignoring the movie/film side completely. From the gaming side, what's Toshiba gaining? POTENTIAL userbase at the expense seems risky, especially since they'll have to guarantee a certain number of units, which means a guaranteed loss of cost * contracted units. It just seems silly. The timetable's all wrong for this kind of deal, and it would seem a much better decision for Toshiba to just go ahead and push for unification. Their business model relies on them selling CE hardware, not providing units at a loss for a peripheral entertainment market. Game consoles aren't guaranteed to provide substantial movie sales. Otherwise the importance of BD in the PS3 would/should be met with much less skepticism.

Let me know if this is totally off-base. I just can't put the numbers together for this to make any sense at all. PEACE.


Your argument is still flawed. Toshiba gets royalties on HD-DVD movies. Also, you say that we don't know what the actual price of a HD-DVD drive or Blue-Ray drive will be but you keep repeating that Toshiba will lose money selling them to MS. All you are doing is contradicting yourself. The reason you can't put the numbers together is you are blinding yourself.

In my opinion, a flop for Sony would be much bigger than a flop for Toshiba since Sony is trying to ride more on the Blue-Ray wagon (PS3, its CE division's production of the drives themselves, and the format their movies will come out on). If HD-DVD fails, Toshiba can always quit making HD-DVD drives and switch to blue-ray. If Blue-Ray fails, Sony will pretty much have to keep building a (relative) low volume of Blue-Ray drives for the PS3 while having to start production (or buying from a third party) of HD-DVD (or whatever) drives if they want to keep in the CE movie business as well as having their studios switch formats.
 
mech - thing is the xbox has 20 million odd base right?

it's fairly clear (and indeed has been predicted by market 'experts') that the x360 will in all probability at the very least build on this.

lets say the x360 'flops' and sells only 15 million over the course of a couple of years... that is still 15 million HD DVD players out there that toshiba otherwise wouldn't have had. 15 million is quite a boost to an emerging technology. So that's a bad case scenario... (hey the dreamcast 'flopped' and still sold over 12 million units iirc)

a best case scenario, the x360 rivals the PS3 (or shock horror, overtakes it) and toshiba have 40million+ HD DVD players after a couple of years that they otherwise wouldn't have had.

you say you can't see how it's worth it for toshiba to take the risk, i say i can't see how they can afford not to take it. I also think you underestimate the long term rewards to be reaped from licensing whichever technology wins the battle...
 
The MS/Sony flop is a hypothetical, simply that. Let's replace "flop" with "undersells" or something. The win for Toshiba would be if the 360 sells a large amount that can establish a market to sell HD-DVD movies on, which can then feed Toshiba through royalties off the discs. I don't know what they make off each, but would it really be in the same ballpark as what MS and Sony will make off devs making games? Those systems sell hundreds of millions of units of software. A tie-rate of 6-10:1 with a larger royalty per title sold (assumption) would make the deal much rosier for them than for Toshiba. Besides which, Sony makes royalties off BDs as well. Yet there's still concern about the cost of the BD drive. I won't mention that again, b/c this topic is about 360 and HD-DVD, but the same cost issues will arise for the 360. Only now, it impacts both MS and Toshiba.

Toshiba sells HD-DVDs to MS, which helps build their base, and helps them sell software. They make money off the system now. What's Toshiba got? Are they an IP company or a CE company? Is the brunt of their revenue expected to come from HD-DVD media royalties or HD-DVD player sales? Company X has it all inclusive b/c even if a single movie is sold on their format, the drive is just a storage format. An "expensive" one (which is actually something I argued against all this time), but just that, a storage format. The cost is just part of the regular console cost, which will hopefully be recouped through software sales. If not a single HD-DVD movie is sold (hypothetical), or the Xbox360 doesn't significantly contribute to HD-DVD movie sales (hypothetical), what does Toshiba gain?

The reason I say Toshiba will lose money (to answer a688) is because if MS will want to keep costs down, they should conceivably want to pay close to cost for those drives. What cost is, none of us know. But is it gonna be beans? I don't expect any next-gen drive to be a cost-leader on a platform. But that's based on in-house cost. Vendors generally try selling drives at a markup in order to not lose money on the deal. How cheap can Toshiba sell it without dipping into the red? Will that cost be sufficiently low enough not to significantly affect a 360 console that I assume to already be selling at a loss? Again, I don't think these drives will be the cost-leader seeing as they're just regular drives with new lasers and security logic (basics). But I'm kinda suprised that the cost argument has suddenly vanished in order to shoehorn this drive into the X360.

If the HD-DVD drive doesn't cost significantly more than the current DVD drive, then fine. I'd love to see them pull it off. I was one of those that initially expected the 360 to come with one prior to the official spec unveiling. But it seems that it's awful late in the game to toss in a part that some in this thread previously tried to convince me was gonna be this big cost factor for the next-gen. An HDD and a HD-DVD? Bring it on. I expect to get a 360 anyway. But do I believe it's likely? Not a chance in hell. Too late, too expensive (given that costs for the box should already have been locked in early in the year) and serves Toshiba little to no good. It's a gamble, to say the least. And one that doesn't return enough on their investment compared to just going through with unification and selling their own hw on a format that is far less likely to bomb (not 360, but HD-DVD).

The whole argument for unification was that the format war was going to result in two losers as opposed to one possible strong contender. Why this alternative is superior to a stronger, unified platform is beyond me. Continuing the format war, and then pushing drives through a peripheral market at low-profit margins/loss (I don't believe they can stand to make any significant profit from sales to MS), while hoping that peripheral market drives movie sales in a market that's not directly associated with gaming is...far fetched IMO. Great if it happens, but if I had to bet money on it, I would not bet on it ever seeing the light of day. I can see an HD-DVD drive later down the road or something, but for launch? It would be a well-kept secret if true. Wonder why any dev would even mention DVDs at this point if it was true. :? PEACE.

P.S. I don't know why I have to label hypotheticals as such, but that's what I'll do from now on to avoid confusion.
 
think what mechanizeddeath meant was that because Sony has movie studios and games coming out on BR (Sony pictures, Columbia, and recently purchased MGM, etc), they have more invested interest and higher possible ROI on a format because they produce content as well.

Yet sony has to first make back the money they spent on mgm before they can profit on it . Secondly sony still has to produce hits from sony and columbia pictures to continue to make moeny . If sony makes a movie and it flops that will directly affect sales down the line .


Toshiba on the other hand doesn't care how a movie does , even a movie like gigli had a few hundred thousand copies made , all which toshiba will get royalitys for .

Meanwhile Toshiba has no content to gain from first hand, only the royalties to make up for it -
Wrong . TOshiba will gain in alot of ways .

1) x amount of x360 units sold this year before sony starts thier bluray push .

2) joint advertising

3) Movie royalitys for each movie made and since they now have x360 units playing hd-dvd media its a bigger audiance which means companys will put more moives on quicker and produce more discs all = money . NOt to mention long term benfits

4) Toshiba will make moeny off each hd-dvd disc made for games . This is a market that they wouldn't have been in with out the x360. Thus toshiba can start making money back on those drives from the first game launched and a game that sells 15m units like halo 2 did would bring in alot of money even if each disc only costs under a 1$

Now, if Toshiba and all the other HD-DVD companies in the consortium got together and chipped in a bunch of cash to make the drives and gave MS a good deal, that'd be a different story -- who knows, this could happen.

Why ? Who cares about the consortium . This is toshiba's standard , they make money off it . Every company in the consortium will pay a fee for each disc and drive they make to toshiba .


WOW! If you think I'm flaming someone, let me know. I don't think I'm flaming any person, or company. I'll just leave it at that.
Sure you don't . Your bias obviously blinds you to what your saying . Your post is flame bait pure and simple .


Bobbler might have explained my point better for you. I don't see how this deal would work to Toshiba's advantage in the least. They would be taking a net loss to build a userbase. A userbase that doesn't pay them back in any way, except maybe off HD-DVD royalties, if they make any.

No he hasn't and either have you . How does bluray pay back to sony in any other way than royalitys ?

They can make any game they want on dvd and its cheaper . Surely sony would be better off with that as your point is basicly saying there is nothing to offset the losses .

Toshiba will stand to make billions and use the x360 sa a way to secure the new home movie format for the next 10 years and most likely in that time frame be in 1 to 2 consoles in which to make more money .

Its the same arguement that you and sony fans use whenever price is brought up .
"Oh sony can take short term loss for long time gain " If sony can then toshiba surely can who will loose less per unit than sony .


Sony, OTOH, doesn't need BD to even become a standard to make money. It's just a storage medium and drive in their system. Their profits will come from game sales, period.
If that was true they would never have come up with bluray . Face it sony needs this more than even toshiba . Sony is bleeding money from its other markets and they need a product other than the playstation brand to make moeny . Esp since the playstation brand only has about a 3 year cycle (3 years porift , 3 years loss or very close to it ) in which to make money as each new console they introduce looses money .

Bluray / hd-dvd if either becomes the standard will be around for 10+ years and of itself is a very big market and as profitable as the game market . For toshiba this is even more so as they just have to produce the discs and players and not worry about movies or game budgets .


What's Toshiba getting back from MS

I've already listed many things . Large installed base in its first year , money off each game disc made , money off movies they can now sell to those x360 users , a better chance at making hd-dvd the new standard .

There are many things toshiba is getting back from ms . Your just to blind to see it or read other peoples posts .


They'd need a slice of the game sales or something to justify the investment. They are a hardware company who's hardware doesn't provide any proprietary software. That's my point. I'm not bashing anyone. PEACE.
You've bashed ms many times in your first post . ANd secondly your being rude as you can't even bother to read others posts .

Toshiba has a shit load of things to justify thier investment as i've already pointed out in my first reply to you and now in this one . Perhaps if you read other peoples posts you would see just how stupid your posts come off to others and see how useless it is to continue claiming things which you've already been told are false .

Start reading posts instead ofjumping in to bash ms and you might actually become a valuable member of this forum .


Now with that said, I would not expect such a deal from Toshiba. Maybe, maybe, a discounted drive based on pushing the format but not free.
no one has ever said free and what he is saying isn't based on sense or fact . Toshiba stands to make millions if not hundreds of millions off the x360 deal if its true which is far more than they will loose .


The MS/Sony flop is a hypothetical, simply that. Let's replace "flop" with "undersells" or something. The win for Toshiba would be if the 360 sells a large amount that can establish a market to sell HD-DVD movies on, which can then feed Toshiba through royalties off the discs. I don't know what they make off each, but would it really be in the same ballpark as what MS and Sony will make off devs making games? Those systems sell hundreds of millions of units of software. A tie-rate of 6-10:1 with a larger royalty per title sold (assumption) would make the deal much rosier for them than for Toshiba. Besides which, Sony makes royalties off BDs as well. Yet there's still concern about the cost of the BD drive. I won't mention that again, b/c this topic is about 360 and HD-DVD, but the same cost issues will arise for the 360. Only now, it impacts both MS and Toshiba.
hey your the one who started it with your sony have locked eu and japan .

The win for toshiba would be more than hd-dvd movies . It will be more marketing this year at hd-dvds launch , it will be a bigger installed base in which to grab hold of those sitting on the fence or in sony's camp and get them to make movies for thier formay , its also money made on the game discs . Toshiba unlike ms and sony don't have to make back the same because they will not loose the same amount of money . Tosbhiba will not take a loss of a 125$ (based on xbox ) on these drives . They will take perhaps 20-25$ to get the price right . I'm expecting hd-dvd drive costs to fall between dvd and bluray but closer to bluray . So yes toshiba will make less per game made than sony and ms . However they have less invested and thus a 15m game like halo 3 on hd-dvd will still make them millions and at some point a large majority of games will just use the hd-dvd disc .

Yet the key is movies . You don't want to admit it but sony and toshiba want control of this 10 year + market in which either one of them has the chance to make money on each of the drives sold and each movie / rom sold . That is billions of dollars . For toshiba getting into a console that will most likely sell around 3 million units this season is key to getting that market . Then for x360 to hit its goals and sell 10 million in its first 18 months will only strengthen toshiba's position and increase the sales for them .


Besides which, Sony makes royalties off BDs as well. Yet there's still concern about the cost of the BD drive. I won't mention that again, b/c this topic is about 360 and HD-DVD, but the same cost issues will arise for the 360. Only now, it impacts both MS and Toshiba.
Your wrong . First off you have no proof that there will be the same cost issues . SEcondly it does impact both ms and toshiba . However that is two companys taking a hit . Not 1 . Toshiba and ms can both ride out looses on the hd-dvd drive in the xbox 360 and it will be easier for them to make up the loss . Both are profitable unlike how sony is currently doing . Also sony will be taking looses still on the psp and on the whole ps3 .


Toshiba sells HD-DVDs to MS, which helps build their base, and helps them sell software. They make money off the system now. What's Toshiba got?
read my posts and you willu nderstand .


Are they an IP company or a CE company? Is the brunt of their revenue expected to come from HD-DVD media royalties or HD-DVD player sales?
They will make money off both . How dumb of a question is this . Toshiba gets money off each hd-dvd disc sold . Period , end of story . Toshiba will also make money on hd-dvd player sales from anyone who makes them , period , end of story .


Company X has it all inclusive b/c even if a single movie is sold on their format, the drive is just a storage format. An "expensive" one (which is actually something I argued against all this time), but just that, a storage format. The cost is just part of the regular console cost, which will hopefully be recouped through software sales.
your a very silly man if you believe this .

Sony knows how big the dvd market is and is expecting the hd market to be just as big in the future . In the end who ever controlls that maket will make much more than sony can in the console sector . Not to mention that at any moment sony can start loosing ground in that console market and make less each time


If not a single HD-DVD movie is sold (hypothetical), or the Xbox360 doesn't significantly contribute to HD-DVD movie sales (hypothetical), what does Toshiba gain?
ANy hd-dvd game made hte will get money . Toshiba has thigns to loose that is right . But your not seeming to grasp the concept that toshiba unlike sony wont be loosing 100-200$ a x360 put out and that if toshiba can take the market they will be making much more money then they put out . Anyway hd-dvd movies will be sold .Even laser disc sold movies . The more players out there the more movies will be produced and the more will be sold to customers .


The reason I say Toshiba will lose money (to answer a688) is because if MS will want to keep costs down, they should conceivably want to pay close to cost for those drives.
once again sony is doing the same thing . Do you think toshiba cares about 2005 / 2006 ? Toshiba cares about 2007-2015 because it wants to be the high def player because once again they can make billions . xbox 360 will be the cheapest way for them to do it as the system will sell and it will be shipping in mass quanitys this holiday before toshiba's rival can put out its trojan .




You really don't see whats at stake for these two companys (toshiba and sony )

Its a market that unlike the video game industry has a longer cycle and creates almost the same amount of money that all video games make each year .

To either company they will be willing to loose some money to become the one with the format still standing . For toshiba that could be loosing a few million in 2005/2006 so that in 2008 they can be making billions . To sony it could be loosing millions in the ps3 so that in 2008 they can be making billions from something other than the playstation brand
 
------
If ms goes with hd-dvd toshiba will have a huge platform out this holiday season to go hand in hand with the launching of hd-dvd in the states .
------

Well, this is true only IF the HD-DVD spec gets done really soon. BTW, the DVD Forum just approved the HD-DVD ROM 0.9 spec (not even 1.0). And the AACS spec is not finalized yet.

Why is this an issue, if Toshiba is willing to sell the drives cheap? Because without the spec done, there won't be a decoder/AACS chip to put into those drives.

The same issue is present for BD, which is also a risk for Sony/PS3. But as someone said, they can ship PS3 without BD movie capability... Sony cannot sit aside on PS3/BD like Microsoft can on X360/HD-DVD because Sony has invested too much on BD.

Hong.
 
could they do HD-DVD drives and then do a firmware update to enable movie playback via xbox live?

on the subject at hand, I don't see what toshiba has to lose here. if they provide the drives at cost to MS, or even have a shared "loss" with MS it would help HD-DVD immensely.

I think the benefit of having HD-DVD in the 360 is far more of a benefit for Toshiba than it would be for MS, I'm still a firm believer that HD playback capabilities will not sell a signifigant number of consoles. The fraction of a fraction of a fraction of users is not enough of a market.

The biggest concern right now is who will win the war, and to that end, Toshiba has everything to gain and nothing to lose by providing extremely low cost HD-DVD drives. They need to win the war first, then they can truly reap the profits from players, recoredrs and media.
 
What MS should do is offer a standard DVD drive 360 for the normal price, and offer both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray equipped 360's for $50 more. As long as the games are on DVD, it shouldn't matter what drive a person gets.
 
Powderkeg said:
What MS should do is offer a standard DVD drive 360 for the normal price, and offer both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray equipped 360's for $50 more. As long as the games are on DVD, it shouldn't matter what drive a person gets.

I completely agree unless someone wants to sell MS the drives at a loss so including HD-DVD does not add costs to the system. I will never use a console as a movie playback machine so I would rather not pay for what I don't use. I hope sticking to DVD forces developers to get away from all the CGI that has plagued consoles since the PS1 and use the ingame engine for cut scenes.
 
jvd said:
Toshiba will stand to make billions and use the x360 sa a way to secure the new home movie format for the next 10 years and

Man, that's going to suck if HD-DVD becomes the defacto standard for the next 10 years seeing as how they are limited to 1080i media. Sure a play back device might be able to upscale it to 1080p or beyond but if physically the limitation (due to disc structure) is only 1080i.
 
Back
Top