Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oh no alonso![]()
![]()
but the racing was good
but verstappen, ooooh its so unfair ooooh he crossed the line oooooh
such a baby
but did leclerc actually cross the line? people seemed to be skirting that line a lot with one or two wheels, never 3 or 4My favorite two drivers showing why they are my favorite two drivers. Awesome stuff. Very bad luck for Peres.
Alonso and Ocon gave a nice show, but they could probably better spend that time trying to drive faster while working together, giving each other DRS, slipstream etc.
And as for the line, it is totally a fair point. I hate when that kind of stuff is inconsistent. On the one hand the rule says it is not allowed and then on the other nothing happens if you break the rule. Which, incidentally, is there for good safety reasons.
I feel like the pit exit line may be more stictly enforced than the entry, but Max mentioned the pit entry line several times and I don’t think the Sky or F1TV post-race shows even mentioned it. Like, show a picture or something and look up the relevant rule so we know what Max is talking about?And as for the line, it is totally a fair point. I hate when that kind of stuff is inconsistent. On the one hand the rule says it is not allowed and then on the other nothing happens if you break the rule. Which, incidentally, is there for good safety reasons.
madman lolI'm getting up at 4.30AM to watch this race and SkySport build-up
Happy days, me likes new rules![]()
Maybe Ferrari would have been the fastest car in the place regardless, but the Red Bull was not in its balance sweet spot. The way the track had evolved from Friday caught it out. Then, Red Bull was seeing rear graining on the medium tyre. So it adjusted accordingly and went several steps in that direction – within variations between Verstappen’s car and that of Sergio Perez – and by the time it was realised the rubbering of the track had fundamentally changed the tyre challenge, it was too late in the era of parc ferme.
Front graining was very much the general problem, but particularly for Red Bull from Saturday onwards. Part of the set-up response to Friday’s rear graining was to run a little more rear wing flap. Its end-of-straight speed advantage was not as big as usual, albeit still there.
Ms Zee Zed
4 days ago (edited)
Seeing these floors, reminded me I heard a theory on the BBC coverage of Melbourne FP1 today. These photos verify the basic detail that the Mercedes is exposing a larger area of the upper floor with its slim side-pods, but Mercedes can’t prevent the edges of this larger unsupported floor area from flexing down at high speed and triggering porpoising. This means they have to run their car at a higher ground clearance than they want to, losing them about 0.5 sec per 70 sec lap. There is a logic to this, but does it make sense in aerodynamic development? It seems to me this flexing could be seen in a wind tunnel or CFD simulation even if the porpoising effect isn’t? Are Mercedes using models made of other materials for their wind-tunnel tests (like McLaren) rather than a full-scale carbon-fibre floor car?
Forza Gary
4 days ago
Wind-tunnel models are built much stiffer so it might not be visible. On CFD I cannot comment much, but I would imagine with the limited simulations they run a lot of steady simulations which will dampen out oscillations like you would get in porpoising. Also fluid, structure coupling is an expensive and difficult subject in simulation work, when it comes to time unsteady behaviour
B Sport
4 days ago
Exactly, windtunnel models are too stiff to show this effect. CFD models stay rigid too. You can only investigate if you know the problem beforehand and that wasn't the case before the season started.And yes, Red Bull can hide some reinforcement underneath their large sidepods, whereas Mercedes can't.
https://accounts.google.com/Service...p&hl=en&next=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D9_vu4YUe890&hl=en
Ms Zee Zed
4 days ago
@B Sport This suggests that they can’t fully resolve this away from the track as suggested. It may be the Mercedes design fundamentally prevents them from accessing the speed the wind-tunnel says is there, due to the weight penalty for building the car more stiffly. This new design set, with track time & cost caps is fascinating.
RuyLopezQB6
4 days agoIt seems to me that [Ferrari] running a gurney flap under the wing is much more elegant than Merc cutting their wing. Is the underside gurney flap producing a milder effect than just cutting it back? It seems quite drastic by Merc, because once you've cut it, you can't undo it.
B Sport
4 days ago
True, but you can have a couple of them with you. Producing multiple flaps of the same kind is not that expensive because the moulds are already there and there is no extra development work.The Gurney on the underside does give you a drag penalty when DRS is active, the chopped off wing has a clean flow around it.