Because it's not selling as well? I'm sure Microsoft has pretty good market data at their disposal.
Uh, considering the PS3 was selling more than the Xbox 360 before Q4, I don't think that's true.
Because it's not selling as well? I'm sure Microsoft has pretty good market data at their disposal.
O.K. I get that they're talking about shipped numbers, but where are their PS3 numbers from? There's no way they could know PS3 shipped numbers unless Sony told them.
They bumped the Xbox 360 to 5.5 million in the fourth quarter, why wouldn't Sony ship an equally over-the-top amount?
Earlier today, Microsoft's European gaming arm said hardware sales surpassed 8 million units in the region. "That was a top priority market this year," said Greenberg.
I said the average sales per year were 9.3 million for Xbox 360 and 10 million for the PS3, based on the 28 million vs. 20 million numbers. In other words, 28 million divided by 3 years vs. 20 million divided by 2 years.So official numbers up to December 2007 were 18.7m Xbox 360 and 10 million PS3?
I said the average sales per year were 9.3 million for Xbox 360 and 10 million for the PS3, based on the 28 million vs. 20 million numbers. In other words, 28 million divided by 3 years vs. 20 million divided by 2 years.
Nope, North America has slightly more PS2's sold than Europe. I dont have a link, but I do recall it.
And no, this is not overshipped. Overshipped was Xbox's 2006..were they rushed to hit 10m first, and ended up shipping next to nothing the next two Q's.
I said the average sales per year were 9.3 million for Xbox 360 and 10 million for the PS3, based on the 28 million vs. 20 million numbers. In other words, 28 million divided by 3 years vs. 20 million divided by 2 years.
Uh, considering the PS3 was selling more than the Xbox 360 before Q4, I don't think that's true.
That's not how this works. Now I don't know exactly how channel stuffing works, meaning that I don't know why retailers would order too many units from the manufacturers. Usually they order the amount they expect to sell in a relatively short amount of time, as there is no point in keeping money sitting on a warehouse shelf. So retailer buys the consoles from the manufacturers and the demand of the console naturally affects the total amounts.
The console manufactures can react to these changes quite fast and adjust the production accordingly. You don't ship all your quarter's consoles at the beginning of the quarter, but gradually over the time period. in the case of Microsoft the price cut was most likely planned long time ago and they already had relatively good knowledge how it will affect the demand of the console. Sony However didn't have a price cut, so naturally the demand of the PS3 woulnd't just suddenly rise as much as it did for the X360.
It would rise more than Microsoft is predicting.
Do you mean that the demand for the PS3 would rise more than what MS thinks it would?
If so then what makes you think so?
Ok Ill let people in on my secret weapon..if you want to see the ship numbers they're here:
http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=2426
It's ostensibly a Nintendo based article, but all the manufactorers numbers are in there..
That's not how this works. Now I don't know exactly how channel stuffing works, meaning that I don't know why retailers would order too many units from the manufacturers. Usually they order the amount they expect to sell in a relatively short amount of time, as there is no point in keeping money sitting on a warehouse shelf. So retailer buys the consoles from the manufacturers and the demand of the console naturally affects the total amounts.
The console manufactures can react to these changes quite fast and adjust the production accordingly. You don't ship all your quarter's consoles at the beginning of the quarter, but gradually over the time period. in the case of Microsoft the price cut was most likely planned long time ago and they already had relatively good knowledge how it will affect the demand of the console. Sony However didn't have a price cut, so naturally the demand of the PS3 woulnd't just suddenly rise as much as it did for the X360.
-Im not sure if this is what you are/were getting at.
Precisely why i dont agree with judging a consoles performance on LTD figures.