<sounds of catisfit finding a Humble Pie Hat>
it seems even with the pricecut for the wii, it sold less than it did last year at the same time!!!
I just volunteered. I'm cross-posting this from GAF:Anybody know if an intrepid Gaffer worked out the sales for every week for each console by analyzing the graph down to the pixel level?
I know somebody did that last year, and it's much more interesting than just the graph.
2007 2008 2009
360 22.5 24.0 36.5
PS2 34.5 11.5 9.5
PS3 30.5 36.0 41.5
Wii 67.5 83.5 67.5
(all out of 155)
124,79,51,46
46,38,34,31
39,41,38,30
37,34,31,28
25,29,31,28
27,28,30,31
32,35,38,35
34,31,33,32
36,31,36,166
94,82,72,96
89,81
units share
360 1.87M 23.5%
PS2 0.49M 6.1%
PS3 2.13M 26.8%
Wii 3.46M 43.6%
The MS vs. Sony contention for second place is silly when they're both way behind the Wii.
They're a few market share points or one or two million units within each other.
Meanwhile, Wii market share is tens of market share points or tens of millions of units higher.
Big picture.
Of course they should try to maximize sales and profits.
It's the whole my sales are better than yours, no it's not exchange.
Big picture to me is that the market share that the PS3 and 360 are fighting for is, while smaller, still very significant. There's potentially an awful lot of money to be made on those 1 to 2 million units over the time each one of those consoles is in active use.
Don't forget that the consumers spend more money per console and per game, and they buy online content.In other words (PS3+360) market=>Wii market.