Thing is, monitors are not TVs and vice versa. Because of the distance from you to a monitor, anything but integer scaling on a monitor always looks ugly.
Is the problem that HFR is not realistic, or that it doesn't look movie-like?
Isn't the complaint usually that it's too realistic? That's certainly the case with me. You can clearly see that your watching a bunch of actors jumping around on a set.
Or as you say, you lose that "movie look" which helps you suspend disbelief.
Nothing to do with game frame rate and resolution though since it's all about frame exposure times.
That's compared to movies. Computer games are a different kettle of fish. I don't recall anyone complaining about higher framerate in a game.
I think the 24fps exposure gave motion pictures the "look" that we are used to (motion blur/stutter). If you've see actual movie props, they look fake and cheap. I suppose the HFR would make that more obvious given that 2X amount of visual details are provided in terms of frames and not the resolution, thus the props looks "fake" when it's closer to what they actually look like.
Believe me, I've seen people diss 60fps games and claim 30fps looks more "real". Madness.
That's what it seems like in my experience. I think movies look a lot better at 24 fps than 60fps. It only seems like that though because only Soap operas and talk shows have ever been filmed at 60fps. Like ever.
That's what it seems like in my experience. I think movies look a lot better at 24 fps than 60fps. It only seems like that though because only Soap operas and talk shows have ever been filmed at 60fps. Like ever.
My nephew who's 5yrs old will adapt to 60fps better as he's had a lot less exposure to 24fps like I have.
Nope. He'll be watching 24 fps films all his life too. He's already watching lots on TV, DVD, and/or BluRay. Even if cinema were to jump to HFR tomorrow, unless he only watches modern movies he'll become conditioned to the 24 fps legacy perception that we all have. Only those born into an HFR world will not understand the fuss of the early 21st century and people wanting a juddery, unclear look to their movies.My nephew who's 5yrs old will adapt to 60fps better as he's had a lot less exposure to 24fps like I have.
That's because your brain is so used to processing film and video at 24fps it freaks out when you show it 60fps which is why it looks weird/funny.
I watched a good chunk of videos on youtube from people in the film industry and they were saying it will take years for 60fps to accepted because people's brains just aren't prepared for anything above the 24fps they're used to and the biggest hurdle with 60fps is changing the way peoples brains see it when it's used to seeing 24fps for years.
I've had nearly 28yrs of watching video at 24fps so 60fps to my brain looks weird and not right.
My nephew who's 5yrs old will adapt to 60fps better as he's had a lot less exposure to 24fps like I have.
That's what it seems like in my experience. I think movies look a lot better at 24 fps than 60fps. It only seems like that though because only Soap operas and talk shows have ever been filmed at 60fps. Like ever.
Are there any soap operas filmed in 60 fps?
Are there any soap operas filmed in 60 fps?
Lots of TV soap operas are/were interlaced, and thus shot at 60 fps.
I'm not sure now, as they tend to prefer 24 fps progressive for bluray distribution.
Lots of TV soap operas are/were interlaced, and thus shot at 60 fps.
I'm not sure now, as they tend to prefer 24 fps progressive for bluray distribution.