I've read the TPU review and on the 'relative performance' section no where does it conclude the 3080 is anywhere close to being 18% faster.
They're as tied as two GPU's can be.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Founders Edition Review
NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4070 launches today. In this review we're taking a look at the Founders Edition, which sells at the baseline MSRP of $600. NVIDIA's new FE is a beauty, and its dual-slot design is compact enough to fit into all cases. In terms of performance, the card can match RTX 3080...www.techpowerup.com
I guess it depends on if you think the software Nvidia is bringing with these cards is worth it. Frame gen and dlss3 is doing a lot of heavy lifting
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Specs
NVIDIA AD104, 2475 MHz, 5888 Cores, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 12288 MB GDDR6X, 1313 MHz, 192 bitwww.techpowerup.com
I don't only look at a single cherry picked resolution.
Regards,
SB
As someone who plays older games their software makes it very easy for me to run SGSSAA on pretty much any game which as far as I'm aware is not possible on AMD drivers.
Neither do I, there review doesn't support your claims in the slightest, neither does DF's review, or Guru3d's reviews any many others.......for that matter.
Uh, I just linked you the TPU page. Keep in mind I don't use any upscaling (DLSS/FSR/XESS) as they aren't generally an improvement for me and as I mentioned, I wouldn't touch frame generation with a 10 mile pole.
Regards,
SB
TPU don't use upscaling in their main testing as it's covered in a separate section so across 25 games with no upscaling used it's 0-5% behind the 3080.
Are you being deliberately obtuse?
From the page I linked for you that you apparently refuse to look at.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Specs
NVIDIA AD104, 2475 MHz, 5888 Cores, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 12288 MB GDDR6X, 1313 MHz, 192 bitwww.techpowerup.com
View attachment 8727
Regards,
SB
Read the small print "Performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks"
You need to look at the review to get the real, actual performance.
Maybe read it again, "Based on TPU review data". It's estimated when there are no reviews, like when a card hasn't been released yet.
Regards,
SB
This is the TPU data base, it estimates performance based on theoretical specs even before the card is released. So far it hasn't been updated to include the numbers from the review yet.Maybe read it again, "Based on TPU review data". It's estimated when there are no reviews, like when a card hasn't been released yet.
It's because it's not really an x70 class card. Had Nvidia not conveniently renamed their dies, this would be an AD106 part, and a cut down one at that. In that light, the performance is actually incredibly impressive, but Nvidia are trying to pull a fast one on us through naming shenanigans, along with extra pricing greed on top of that. Basically, in any normal naming scheme:This card is a joke! slower than the 3080 in some titles?
this thing IMO should be 100 USD cheaper. It would be nice if - once again - consumers did not buy at MSRP to cause the card to depreciate in price. It kinda happened with AMD, right? 7900 XT?It's because it's not really an x70 class card. Had Nvidia not conveniently renamed their dies, this would be an AD106 part, and a cut down one at that. In that light, the performance is actually incredibly impressive, but Nvidia are trying to pull a fast one on us through naming shenanigans, along with extra pricing greed on top of that. Basically, in any normal naming scheme:
AD102 = AD102
AD103 = AD104
AD104 = AD106
It's not like AD103 is somehow a higher tier than typical 104 parts, it's basically 'reduced' from the top 102 die as much as 104 parts usually are, with 256-bit bus and everything. And heck, even the 4080 isn't actually a fully enabled part, it's cut down by like 10%, making it pretty much dead on what the 3070 was in the Ampere lineup. For $1200! lol
They've honestly gone crazy, and I still worry quite hard that the PC gaming community will just let them get away with it.
With this card's specs, it should be at $399 or at worst $449.99. $600 is a scam and imo anyone who buy's this card needs to accept the reality that they'll most likely need to upgrade next gen. Apart from the 4090, the ada lineup has been rather disappointing in price to performance.this thing IMO should be 100 USD cheaper. It would be nice if - once again - consumers did not buy at MSRP to cause the card to depreciate in price. It kinda happened with AMD, right? 7900 XT?
Then again, I thought that would happen with 4080 and 4070 Ti, but consumers apparently bought them really well and are still buying them quite voraciously in spite of the price performance change over the last 2 gens of NV GPUs.
I dont know if they're selling that well, or if Nvidia is just making much better margins now so they dont care, or if they are just holding on in a sort of game of chicken with PC gamers, hoping we eventually relent.this thing IMO should be 100 USD cheaper. It would be nice if - once again - consumers did not buy at MSRP to cause the card to depreciate in price. It kinda happened with AMD, right? 7900 XT?
Then again, I thought that would happen with 4080 and 4070 Ti, but consumers apparently bought them really well and are still buying them quite voraciously in spite of the price performance change over the last 2 gens of NV GPUs.