AbsoluteBeginner
Regular
Probably. Are settings the same for 60fps and 4K mode?
Digital Foundry Article Technical Discussion [2020]
- Thread starter BRiT
- Start date
- Status
The only differences between image quality mode (4K/60fps) and performance mode (1080p/120fps) are resolution settings, no other assets or quality settings have been changed.
Yes, comes down to origins from Xbox One and PS4. Gearbox scaled those up, despite the ability to adjust settings for One X and Series X|S.
bugs and oversight is the most likely answer regarding this launch period and such similarly capable machines.
Maybe only 8 threads and the games is not using SMT.
Here the XSX CPU runs at 3.8 Ghz against 3.5 Ghz for PS5.
Thanks. Is there a possibility that DF could provide with their game write-ups performance analysis/statistics files similar to this? It would be great for archiving and keeping records on prior game performance and/or when new patches are introduced.
I get the appeal of the stats but they're pretty noisy -- average and mean times can be misleading, i'd rather the game that sits at 59 fps for 6 hours than one that sits at 60 for 5 and a half hours and like 40 or something the rest.
Mostly they seem useful for console warring, I much prefer DF's approach of authored/subjective analysis of the experience plus frame graph data to back it up.
And thats the problem for many, if your into platform warring, you wont like DF since their unbiased. Go to NXgamer or something if you like platform PS etc etc. But DFs view can angle at any.
From 11:10 of the video, PS5 can also lead xsx (sometimes about 15fps). How do you DF say PS5 or xsx has performance advantage?Borderlands 3 tested on PS5, Xbox Series X and Series S - can next-gen sustain 60fps?
Article here: https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2020-borderlands-3-next-gen-upgrade-tested
A second game with better (albeit crappy) foliage on one platform? From puddlegate to saladgate?
In others gameplay (on foot) scenes, PS5 seems to have a slight advantage at 120fps. I think the game seems to be mostly GPU bound, even in some 120fps scenes, notably the driving scene (and having better shadows and vegetation doesn't help the PS5). Overall both versions are very similar but with VRR XSX has (again) a clear advantage anyways at 120fps.
AbsoluteBeginner
Regular
Probably on average. The lower the rendering budget, the more your fps goes down even on smaller spikes. So if you suddenly run 120fps on both and one of them has explosion, fps can tank even if other would tank more if there was similar activity on screen. So, small spikes make big difference at such frame rates.
Janne Kylliö
Newcomer
Because It's not showing the exact same thing on both consoles at the same time so there will be differences. However, when looking at same things the XSX seems to have the edge in frame rate.
Unknown Soldier
Veteran
From what I have been seeing, at 60fps with RT on, the XBSX is faster yes likely due to it having more RT cores i.e. 52 vs 36 however if you move to performance mode and 120fps is the target, the PS5 seems to be better than the XBSX in that it can keep 120fps more constant.
D
Deleted member 86764
Guest
The image at the back looks like Assassin's Creed to me. I can't imagine it has anything to do with RT.
nvm
DavidGraham
Veteran
Max is 2070 Super, realistically it should be 2070.
Rasterization i think you mean?
These 2018 products still here and being compared to 2020 hardware, nice
AbsoluteBeginner
Regular
Definitely closer to 2070S then 2070. In fact, 2070S would probably be perfect match, as PS5 GPU seems to be a bit better then 5700XT which is lately very much a match for 2070S.
- Status
Similar threads
