Business ramifications of piracy *spawn

Yes, or Sony can consider an iOS business model, the way Kutaragi intended (It's his curse ! ^_^).

The laypeople have experiences with malware, they'd want some trusted people to verify and distribute software.
 
Yes, or Sony can consider an iOS business model, the way Kutaragi intended (It's his curse ! ^_^).

The laypeople have experiences with malware, they'd want some trusted people to verify and distribute software.

You would think. But there's still millions upon millions of Apple Users that refuse to believe their computers can become infected by Malware. :p

Regards,
SB
 
It's all in the marketing and track record. ^_^

Besides, homebrew folks can create wonderful software. I don't think they'd reject getting rewarded for their effort. It works both ways. There may be objectable content in unverified software too.
 
How likely is it for a world-wide PS3 recall? Sony could issue the recall, return new un-fucked PS3s (properly cryptoed) to people and ban all old PS3s.

It would be super-expensive, though and it could break Sony. Maybe they'll just let it slide?
 
Sure, but is there any industry precedent? I know cars have been recalled, for example Lancia had to recall cars in the UK due to rust problems and that really broke Lancia's reputation in the UK, though Lancia isn't very interesting nowadays anyway.
 
I have no idea; haven't heard of such recall in the console space before. I suppose they could.

Personally, I'm more curious how far Sony can co-exist with homebrew, and what marketing and business solutions they can adopt to counter piracy. Pure technical means is the "proven" way, but not necessarily the only way.
 
How likely is it for a world-wide PS3 recall? Sony could issue the recall, return new un-fucked PS3s (properly cryptoed) to people and ban all old PS3s.

It would be super-expensive, though and it could break Sony. Maybe they'll just let it slide?

Sony isn't in a position right now to do that considering all the loses they had to suffer early on due to the PS3 and shareholders definitely wont allow this move and we are talking about 41 million consoles here.

It is such a difficult situation right now for Sony, but I don't understand how leaking such important keys is not a crime?
 
The ~50million already out are compromised. I would assume that Sony can at least protect it's PS3 consoles going forward, via a hardware revision, which of course will take time to design, trickle down, etc. Though, I'm not sure of that. And we have to hope Sony's security isn't so shoddy again which isn't a given.

There must be emergency top level meetings at Sony over this stuff...

Yeah. I expect a hardware revision to the slim this year that changes the low-level crypto structure for the firmware and will not be compatible with update.pup files that work on the older hardware.

Given that they support USB installation of firmware updates, they'll have to make it obvious that the new hardware requires the new variant update.pup files, which suggests they'll have to make the new version stand out in some fashion so people will know which they have.. or else go to some kind of two-file standard for USB updates, and let the console pick which one to use.

If Sony does this and then requires new firmware (on whatever model) to verify and run newly released games, they will at least be able to limit the impact to.. the fifty million PS3s currently out there.

Ow. :oops:
 
Perhaps not a total recall -- if they choose to go this route.

[size=-2]I won't send mine in for example. :)
They may fix those in the channels.[/size]
 
Does anyone have any statistics on just how few consumers actually respond to product recalls that don't involve severe risk of death? I imagine the number is significantly lower than mail-in-rebate numbers.
 
If you can hack it and be done with it without fear of having to touch it again or refix it then it is more of a problem than if you can come out every year with updates to vex the pirates. Which is it, is an important question to ponder because it has huge ramifications. Heck the pirates may be able to fix the fixes when the games get released.

That's what I'm wondering about. Knowledgeable users who crack their console will be able to keep their hacked firmware always up to date, to defeat whatever Sony does, but those guys are essentially us, insignificant. Joe Schmoe who buys his console pre-modded may not be so capable; naturally, if pirates are ambitious (and suicidal) they could set up some sort of auto-update function, but for obvious reasons that'd be problematic.

Edit: on digitalfoundry's piece, it should be noted that the Wii can be softmodded, no modchips necessary. DF doesn't say that it can't, but there's an implication there.

Edit2: on 'the dreamcast situation', wasn't the situation that no one really bought the console in the first place? They didn't drop the price to $99 by 2000 (when I got mine) because they were selling gangbusters to pirates.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's what I'm wondering about. Knowledgeable users who crack their console will be able to keep their hacked firmware always up to date, to defeat whatever Sony does, but those guys are essentially us, insignificant. Joe Schmoe who buys his console pre-modded may not be so capable; naturally, if pirates are ambitious (and suicidal) they could set up some sort of auto-update function, but for obvious reasons that'd be problematic.

Fortunately, Sony is preventing people from becoming knowledgeable users by deleting any comments to the PS Blog mentioning the hacks. :rolleyes:
 
they should have known that crackers and pirates will always try to break your console. instead of making it easier for them they should have made it harder. Linux Damaged sony big time. geohot hacked the ps3 through that. gave other hackers an idea on how the hypervisor works. Then USB caused the next fatal damage. Ps jail break and other clones have allowed hackers the tools to get into the vicinity of the vault. It was just a matter of time before the vault was opened although using a constant for a random number certainly didnt help.

Even without linux, we'd still get the leaked dongle, we'd still get jailbroken PS3s running arbitrary code -- the vulnerability was there, it would've been found eventually.
 

I thought GeoHotz started hacking PS3 before OtherOS was removed (from Slim). He mentioned on his blog that some Brazilian dude got him a Fat PS3 to start, or did I remember it wrongly ?

Given the weak security behind PS3, once GeoHotz got in, it would have gone down earlier if Sony hadn't removed OtherOS.

The universal removal of OtherOS did consolidate the hacking effort though.
 
Fortunately, Sony is preventing people from becoming knowledgeable users by deleting any comments to the PS Blog mentioning the hacks. :rolleyes:

What do you expect them to do? Sony hasn't pronounced itself at all on this, they're probably all scurrying on how to spin this to the press.
 
I thought GeoHotz started hacking on PS3 before OtherOS was removed (from Slim). He mentioned on his blog that some Brazilian dude got him a Fat PS3 to start, or did I remember it wrongly ?

He closed his twitter account and blocked his blog, so it's hard to get a timeline.

Given the weak security behind PS3, once GeoHotz got in, it would have gone down earlier if Sony hadn't removed OtherOS.

In the end removing or keeping OtherOS might've been irrelevant, since the service-mode dongle showed up. People like to construct narratives around these events, though, and it sends a better message if they can say that Sony brought this upon themselves. (Well, they did by screwing up the crypto code, but I mean in terms of behavior regarding the PS3.)
 
Back
Top