Could be but surely LOT wouldn't be that silly as to post a shot which hasn't fully loaded?!
B3D News Item: Challenge: Find Differences between Crysis 2 Console SKUs
- Thread starter KKRT
- Start date
Could be but surely LOT wouldn't be that silly as to post a shot which hasn't fully loaded?!
They did the same for Homefront
Warning: Spoiler on the second page
Could be right, though at a different angle.
http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa475/NIGHTMAR3xGTx/Games/Crysis2360-4.jpg
This shot is from Ruskie and he has the game installed on hdd.
It's LoT, man.
*runs*
Anyways. you folks sure don't understand what the comparison thread is for.
(have to keep moving stuff...)-----
About the only thing that seemed worth investigating was the texture compression artefact (first image second page). I was actually wondering more about the texture format differences based on the advanced rendering techniques presentation they did including the improved 3Dc encoding. Whoever was doing the comparison at LoT needs to learn a thing or two about standing still though. I don't really need the frame blending artefact to muddy the comparison.
yep. they sure have a couple of times now...really thinking they are more about creating drama
Anyways. you folks sure don't understand what the comparison thread is for.
For stating our console biases?
GET HIM!!!!!!!!!
I would comment on yet another thing if I may...Notice how PS3 has "stronger" lighting in 4th shoot,2nd page?Now look at reflections on that skyscraper(glass one).It seems like sun on 360 is set on different place,as game does alot of times when you replay mission.It sets sun in different position and then level looks different than last time.
Its weird they haven't noticed that...
Its weird they haven't noticed that...
I'm sorry but LoT is horrible, can't really put much faith in their material or their findings.
I thought the SP had a passing time of day mechanic, no?
I thought the SP had a passing time of day mechanic, no?
To me it seems like for like.
@above
No,Crysis 2 does not change TOD on fly but when you play again sun is set on different place and so shadows also change.
It could be the same (0xAF) or mch better (8xAF) depending on the situation. Of course if nothing changed sience the leaked alpha/beta.
I'm now very close to end of the game and I have been paying close attention of AF all this time.All I can say it works really really well.Haven't encounter situations when there was no AF.Could be that those 0-8 ranges depend if its MP or SP,I dunno but it looked exactly the same whenever I would drop a look.Textures are also very detailed...
Why the texture on the ps3 here is so more crisper compared the first direct capture?
http://www.abload.de/img/crysis2360-4spo0.gif
http://www.lensoftruth.com/wp-content/gallery/h2h_crysis_2_retail/ps3-rollover_02.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/crysis2360-4spo0.gif
http://www.lensoftruth.com/wp-content/gallery/h2h_crysis_2_retail/ps3-rollover_02.jpg
Last edited by a moderator:
djskribbles
Legend
I think we should just wait for the DF article. But as a PS3 owner, I think the LoT article at least shows that the PS3 version looks great too and I don't understand why some people were complaining.
Now I'm interested in seeing how they perform.
Now I'm interested in seeing how they perform.
There are definitely some differences with the PS3 winning out in max AF for a number of scenes. On 360, it seems they just flag certain textures for AF where it'll be noticeable the most e.g. ground textures might look fine, but the wall won't be as great.
