AMD: R8xx Speculation

If I get time maybe I'll take a screenshot and upload it.

However, as long as you don't look at the Dragon Statue or sides of buildings, triangle sizes are generally greater than 4-6 pixels.

But, the stones in the corner of buildings and most especially the Dragon Statue. Triangles do go to sub-pixel sizes. Put into wireframe and look at the Dragon statue and most of it is just a solid mass of white. Even when viewed up close, large portions of the dragon are solid white.

That's why I said, the use of tessellation on the statue is excessive and probably meant primarily to stress the engine/video card.

Doors also get an excessive level of tessellation that is totally unwarranted.

There's a LOT of optimisation that could be done with regards to excessive tessellation on objects that don't need as much.

The cobblestone pathway while exaggerated uses an order of magnitude less triangles than the flat doors for instance. Reduce the number of triangles on the flat doors by an order of magnitude and performance would increase greatly.

Regards,
SB

 

The problem is that displacement mapping generally only looks good with subpixel triangle sizes. Otherwise the results get... noisy.

 

Some screens to illustrate...

Door and Cobblestone road.



Dragon Statue...




A bit excessive on both. And kills performance.

The cobblestone road and roofing shingles on the other hand show tesselation extremely well with very few triangles comparatively.

But again things like that would be up to the software dev to decide when they use this engine to make their game.

[edit]Swapped out image host, hopefully it worked right.

Regards,
SB

 

Adaptive tessellation is nice -- one step beyond a brute LOD scaling would be redistributing the subdivision factors between front facing surfaces and those below a certain steep angle. The last one definitely needs more tessellation to keep the detailed silhouette definitive than the former, if you understand what I mean.

 

Small warning, one of apparently random imageshack adverts launches "fake virus scan" advert, which is infact trojan downloader, MSE instantly popped up, it's TrojanDownloader:JS/Renos with alert level "high"
This is as far as I know completely random advert so just a warning if anyone of you happen to hit it

edit:
I suggest using any other imagehosting service instead of that; heck, if you mail me the images I can host them for you
one free that I know to be virus-free is aijaa.com, though it's in finnish which can cause problems to some - the controls should be rather obvious for everyone though

 

To me, the real benefits of tessellation won't show up until DX11 is a minimum requirement of a game. The tessellation being added to current games seems to be mostly taking a medium-high detail model and making it super detailed. Looks nicer up close, but overall won't doesn't make a big difference while playing.
But if designed from the ground up, and not worrying about hardware that doesn't support it, almost everything can be a low poly model made into a high detail one on the fly, and with that, major memory savings. That should translate into larger game environments while at the same time having more detailed objects and characters. Right now, games typically sacrifice area size or detail, or re-use same models of trees and characters throughout ad nauseam. Tessellation can make all that go away.

 

As I've tried to indicate already - tesselation doesn't necessarily mean that you can use lower polygon counts. In fact, you usually have to use more polygons to build proper models.

 

If you want you can just download the images from imageshack and host them elsewhere, I can redo the links after.

Regards,
SB

 

E6750 @ 3.2GHz, HD 5770, 1600x1200 0xAA 4xAF DX11 Tesselation.
850/1200mhz (stock): 24.8 fps
850/1400mhz: 25.4 fps
950/1400mhz: 27.8 fps

Not much bandwidth limit here

Btw, is it only me that get a "win7 required" message on install of the ati demos? (on my win7 rc)

 

This is a crappy line graph of tessellation on and off. its run at 1680x1050 af at 8 and every thing at max except aa which is off. I ran it twice and took the second numbers of each setting.
Note: this is not a stock clock 5850 its @775/1100

hopefully this works, I havent really used photo hosting sites before.
If someone wants to see the fps data in detail.
tessellation on

Code:

60
59
57
55
52
52
50
49
48
49
50
59
59
58
56
56
54
49
50
48
46
48
49
50
50
49
51
50
49
52
52
52
52
45
36
37
41
42
41
35
33
32
33
33
33
65
65
70
69
69
51
35
32
32
33
35
40
48
46
46
41
44
63
64
65
65
65
50
35
34
34
31
27
25
21
21
18
17
18
24
26
24
22
21
20
21
19
19
21
23
27
27
27
27
27
27
23
21
19
21
21
23
27
30
30
28
26
25
23
21
22
22
25
19
16
16
18
19
18
18
17
17
17
16
19
25
25
27
27
26
27
24
22
21
20
30
38
41
43
48
51
51
47
46
37
33
36
40
40
39
35
33
29
25
26
28
30
26
19
19
17
17
18
21
22
28
28
28
28
26
24
24
24
23
25
27
29
26
23
22
28
29
30
33
29
27
25
24
22
22
21
21
19
20
19
19
17
21
28
28
28
27
27
29
28
28
28
28
27
26
25
26
26
27
28
30
31
33
33
37
69
71
69
65
61
52
45
64
59
48
36
42
47
64
64
64
65
63
45
44
45
46
37
32
31
30
30
32
27
25
23
23
25
32
57

Tesselation off

Code:

69
66
64
61
59
55
51
56
52
53
53
61
61
60
58
59
55
50
51
50
47
50
50
51
52
51
52
53
51
52
54
54
54
49
54
54
56
58
59
44
41
43
42
42
39
72
66
72
71
71
61
53
55
54
52
50
48
50
49
48
44
46
69
71
70
71
72
64
57
60
62
62
65
64
65
64
63
65
65
53
52
53
55
56
59
61
57
54
50
50
76
85
85
86
88
78
64
60
59
62
63
64
64
65
64
64
64
64
64
65
65
65
62
59
62
62
60
63
60
58
59
60
59
60
57
62
64
62
60
56
60
59
59
59
57
47
46
49
52
56
57
57
57
58
53
54
55
56
54
52
50
46
44
43
40
45
47
48
64
60
61
61
60
61
61
62
62
63
63
64
66
66
67
67
69
70
74
72
70
68
58
69
70
74
74
73
72
68
70
68
65
63
64
64
63
68
61
54
51
51
49
48
48
48
47
46
47
47
47
60
60
60
60
59
60
61
61
60
60
60
78
84
83
80
75
59
68
70
69
67
68
48
60
74
77
79
79
75
53
56
56
57
60
73
72
71
69
72
73
74
74
68
69

 

http://home.akku.tv/~akku38901/B3D/hosted/

There's pics including those thumbnails if you want to use them

 

K...I'll swap them out. No clue how to do it, hopefully just swap in the urls for the ones in my post? Will give it a shot.

Regards,
SB

 

I don't doubt that, I was just pointing out that for this demonstration at least, it seems there are some objects with excessive tessellation even though I'm not sure it's needed. The door for example, if you look at it even up close you can't tell it's anything other than a flat texture until you turn on wireframe. And that causes some rather extreme slow down.

While other area's show very effectively the potential of tessellation even without an excessive level of tessellation. Even if the effect itself is a bit exaggerated (cobblestones).

In the end it'll be up to whatever dev uses this engine to determine how much to use.

Regards,
SB

 

I'm talking about the pre tesselation meshes here. If every triangle gets smoothed, you loose tight corners and sharp edges - unless you add smaller strips of polygons there to maintain the shape. But that increases the base polygon count significantly (and is also the reason why cars in racing games are better off without it).

 

4-6 pixel triangles will usually cover four quads, so that's far from efficient. Even if you have favourable shapes (i.e. not skinny), you'll need more than 100 pixels per triangle to break 80% utilization in the shader/pixel pipes.

Moreover, tesselation increases the time spent limited by setup, depending on how complex the pixel shaders are.

 

I have a strange bug with 4870 1GB and Dell 2407 monitor.
I select DX10 1920x1200 (16:10) but the demo only outputs to 1600x1200 @ 59hz (4:3)? It happened to me with 3d mark Vantage too...could never test at 1920x1200...

Am i running out of memory?

 

what has your memory size to do with output resolution?

 

I've stumbled across this interesting website:
http://users.skynet.be/fquake/

Really nice DX Compute Demos!

From description off one of them:

 

Yeah, it seems that's the catch with the DX11 approach and the current hardware.

Good looking displacement actually needs subpixel sized triangles... and there we enter a whole new world of aliasing and sampling issues. I guess there's a reason why Tim Sweeney's talking about micropolygon rendering and software based engines - they've probably did their own displacement tests with UE4 and Gears assets already. So they know very well that this is going to be a problem.

 

See http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=55330