400 bucks vs 1300 in your example and nVidia shouldn't be worried? Really?Cool then.
AMD: R7xx Speculation
- Thread starter Unknown Soldier
- Start date
- Status
400 bucks vs 1300 in your example and nVidia shouldn't be worried? Really?Cool then.
nexus_alpha
Newcomer
how about at least $190 dollars cheaper and single solt and can do quad crossfire
When using quad crossfire it becomes at least $380 dollars cheaper. Not to mention sli is still only nv chipsets - skulltrail
Unknown Soldier
Veteran
And everyone's confirmed Nvidia's price then, nevermind the fact that they'll most probably drop it when HD4870x2 gets released if not earlier.
U do know that if and when Nvidia wake up and realise that they have a lemming that the price will drop.
US
U do know that if and when Nvidia wake up and realise that they have a lemming that the price will drop.
US
Last edited by a moderator:
The price is confirmed by CJ's slide. The 'fact' of a price-drop is no where to be seen.
Also cutting price in face of performance deficit doesnt seem like a comfortable position, which you were alluding to.
Given the monstrous die size and low yields of G200, I'm doubtful that NV's AIB partners have much headroom for margin on G200-based products. Unless of course they want to sell loss-leaders...
Unknown Soldier
Veteran
Well I guess we'll see then.
US
US
Indeed. It's all speculation at this point, no matter how reasoned anyone's arguments. If NV absolutely had to reduce selling price of G200 products to maintain marketshare, I don't doubt they would. It's certainly not good for the bottom line (at least not in the immediate quarter) but it helps in the long run, assuming the situation can be turned around again at some point in the future.
Love_In_Rio
Veteran
No, they should be worried because of the use ATI could give to 1400 million transistors.
Euro vs UDS conversion:www.xe.com
HD 4850 -> 156,00 Euro - 19.6% tax = 130,43 Euro = $204.20 USD
GTX 280 -> 581,83 Euro - 19.6% tax = 486,48 Euro = $761.60 USD
Quad-Fire HD 4850 = 816.80 USD -> Only 7% more than one GTX 280.
HD 4850 -> 156,00 Euro - 19.6% tax = 130,43 Euro = $204.20 USD
GTX 280 -> 581,83 Euro - 19.6% tax = 486,48 Euro = $761.60 USD
Quad-Fire HD 4850 = 816.80 USD -> Only 7% more than one GTX 280.
Euro vs UDS conversion:www.xe.com
HD 4850 -> 156,00 Euro - 19.6% tax = 130,43 Euro = $204.20 USD
GTX 280 -> 581,83 Euro - 19.6% tax = 486,48 Euro = $761.60 USD
Quad-Fire HD 4850 = 816.80 USD -> Only 7% more than one GTX 280.
Unless we get the proof once the cards are out that indeed the problems with micro-stuttering have been aleviated, I really fear, that some people might actually think along your line of argument.
ChronoReverse
Newcomer
That said, if the 4850/4870 had decent lower-level AA performance, using CF AA could be really nice. If I ever got a CF setup, I'd think I'd usually use it for the AA.
Anarchist4000
Veteran
Someone needs to make a video to show this micro-stuttering. I'm sure it happens but just how big a deal is it? The input delay would be more bothersome than inconsistent frame spacing unless you had really low framerates IMHO. Sounds more like an Nvidia PR assault on AMD and their multi-chip solutions than anything else.
Tech ARP
· ATI is set to launch their Radeon HD 4850 graphics card on June 18, 2008. The launch has been delayed to June 25, 2008.
· There will be a higher-end version, the Radeon HD 4870 with DDR5 memory but the launch date is still unknown.
· At least 3 ATI partners said that the Radeon HD 4870 is not ready for launch anytime soon, and if anyone was showing one off, it would have to be a mechanical mockup.
Old news ? Credibility ?
· ATI is set to launch their Radeon HD 4850 graphics card on June 18, 2008. The launch has been delayed to June 25, 2008.
· There will be a higher-end version, the Radeon HD 4870 with DDR5 memory but the launch date is still unknown.
· At least 3 ATI partners said that the Radeon HD 4870 is not ready for launch anytime soon, and if anyone was showing one off, it would have to be a mechanical mockup.
Old news ? Credibility ?
Tech ARP
· ATI is set to launch their Radeon HD 4850 graphics card on June 18, 2008. The launch has been delayed to June 25, 2008.
· There will be a higher-end version, the Radeon HD 4870 with DDR5 memory but the launch date is still unknown.
· At least 3 ATI partners said that the Radeon HD 4870 is not ready for launch anytime soon, and if anyone was showing one off, it would have to be a mechanical mockup.
Old news ? Credibility ?
Well, some rumors said that the release date was pushed to 25th so they would get 4870's out at the same time with the 4850, even if in small quantities
There are videos out there. I believe a German site made them, but I can't remember which or where I saw it linked--maybe at AT.
I don't think it's necessary to wonder. If RV770 has a price to performance ratio advantage at all price-points then NV would be forced to counter with perhaps a 448MB part (assuming they simply halve frame buffer size while maintaining memory bus width).
Except RAM is dirt cheap anyway, isn't it? And I think 448, like the GTS 320 before it, would be treading the line of a really undesirably RAM handicapped card.
- Status
Similar threads
