If you skimp on PCB or VRM design, then likelyHonestly though, how likely it is that memory chip certified by manufacturer to run at 14 Gbps wouldn't do it when paired with Navi 10? (The chips themselves are 14 Gbps on every board)
I thought there were no reference 5600 XT cards?No, because AMD has not actually changed the 5600 XT specs. There are boards being sold that only run at the reference specs.
There are no reference cards but there is reference spec (and we actually have at least one AIB model apparently running that spec, MSI Mech)I thought there were no reference 5600 XT cards?
If there are no reference cards, then card Y from manufacturer A has N clocks, and card YX from same manufacturer A has N+M clocks.
Yes.Didn't some Pascal cards start shipping with higher clocked memory at some point? Like the GTX 1060 with 9MT/s GDDR5 and GTX 1080 with 11MT/s GDDR5X?
Are you refering to the chips on the 5600xt ? if so gamers nexus say they are not rated at 14gbpsThe chips themselves are 14 Gbps on every board
Steve while often on point, is not on this one.Gamers nexus did a video about it there are 2 memory suppliers for navi cards and the ones that are failing when clocked to 14gbps mostly from the same supplier (sorry forgot the name)
Are you refering to the chips on the 5600xt ? if so gamers nexus say they are not rated at 14gbps
ps: this is a really informative video
I know what the slide says, the 14 Gbps memory speed is optional (of course it is, the spec didn't change at all, they just allowed higher overclocks including 14 Gbps memory if the AIB so chooses) and that wasn't my point at all.it says "Memory increase is NOT part of AMD's BIOS update since not all cards can do 14Gpbs"
So designed to do 14 but not tested to do it
You can't really blame the AIB's. I assume AIB's have to cover warranty costs if issues appear at speeds not promised by AMD, or did AMD agree to cover any warranty costs associated with issues at 14 Gbps?When AMD ships their bundles however, they only promised 12 Gbps speed, which is why some manufacturers decided they're not testing their luck (even when the chips themselves are certified to run 14 Gbps by memory manufacturer)
Totally, from that GN video you can see that MSI only test the boards at 12Gbps, and they DO have failures which have to be rectified/ reworked. So there will be boards out there that will fail at 14Gbps. That's a cost and logistical problem the AIB's could well do without.You can't really blame the AIB's. I assume AIB's have to cover warranty costs if issues appear at speeds not promised by AMD, or did AMD agree to cover any warranty costs associated with issues at 14 Gbps?
Obviously I have no idea on the warranties, but considering these memory chips are the exact same chips as used in 5700-series, what are the chances they wouldn't work at the same 14 Gbps with little lower specced Navi 10 GPU?
AMD never changed RX 5600 XT spec, they only allowed higher factory overclocks for both GPU & memory, so obviously the specs on the site are same as always.AMD should then be extremely confident that there would be no warranty issues and would welcome the opportunity to cover AIB warranty problems associated with the "not promised speeds".
They still have only the promised memory speeds on their product page.
Not saying that this is the case here, but it's not unheard of, that certain SKUs get lowered voltage for memories to limit their clock potential.Obviously I have no idea on the warranties, but considering these memory chips are the exact same chips as used in 5700-series, what are the chances they wouldn't work at the same 14 Gbps with little lower specced Navi 10 GPU?
So if they are having failures at 12Gbps then they have failures no matter whether AMD qualifies the memory or not. That's a cost they are well aware of then as an AIB and is assuredly reflected in their discount.Totally, from that GN video you can see that MSI only test the boards at 12Gbps, and they DO have failures which have to be rectified/ reworked. So there will be boards out there that will fail at 14Gbps. That's a cost and logistical problem the AIB's could well do without.
At least for the RX 5600 XT, that's not the case. The memory voltages are the same at 12Gbps and 14Gbps.Not saying that this is the case here, but it's not unheard of, that certain SKUs get lowered voltage for memories to limit their clock potential.
I'm talking about new VBIOSs not bumping memory clocks from 12Gbps to 14Gbps as initially thought despite the memory chips being capable (apparently). If you watch the GN video you will see that as with any production line things fail. As the initial wave of RX5600XTs were only qualified for 12Gbps memory, there will be cards out there that are fine at 12Gbps but not 14Gbps due to manufacturing tolerances, component quality, etc.. The failures at 12Gbps are identified and fixed before the products ship, as part of the testing.So if they are having failures at 12Gbps then they have failures no matter whether AMD qualifies the memory or not. That's a cost they are well aware of then as an AIB and is assuredly reflected in their discount.
That has nothing to do with 5600XT and everything to do with PowerColor. Their 5600 XT Red Dragon uses exact same cooler (and PCB minus couple phases ripped out) as 5700 XT Red Dragon which has no similar issues.The mess around the 5600XT launch goes deeper and deeper still, previously PowerColor boasted about the ability of their cards to handle 14Gbps memory with the new BIOS, even to the point of attacking MSI's choice not to increase memory speed from 12Gbps to 14Gbps, but apparently PowerColor then forgot to properly design the new BIOS with proper fan curves and speeds, the end result is that the card temps reach 100c, constantly overheats and throttles, and the performance drops like a tank to unplayable levels. The card needed a new "new BIOS" to fix the fan issues.