All the best ones are working on more advanced forms of pixel insertion, they have no need for techniques which slot easily into ancient ways of using an engine ... they are more agile. TAA and even TAAU (and even DLSS) are compromises to maintain some decade old practices as long as possible. FSR isn't even a worthy compromise for AAA console devs, it's just plain bad.
All the best ones are working on more advanced forms of pixel insertion, they have no need for techniques which slot easily into ancient ways of using an engine ... they are more agile. TAA and even TAAU (and even DLSS) are compromises to maintain some decade old practices as long as possible. FSR isn't even a worthy compromise for AAA console devs, it's just plain bad.
What you need for TAAU is the same which you need for DLSS so how is Nvidia working against TAAU?
In fact AMD could've taken advantage of that and provide a plugable TAAU solution which would just substitute DLSS in titles where it is being integrated. Everyone would be happy with that I think. Well, Nv wouldn't but whatever.
That was just TAAU.
thanks for the podcast and the reply, I listened to it and I wonder.., have you considered forcing this technique on the GPU drivers so any game could benefit from it? I love gaming at 1440p and high framerates but sometimes you can't at that resolution, plus my favourite game ever, Divinity Original Sin 2, at 1440p can't be played at high framerates without the GPU heating up a little. 1080p internal to 1440p looks horrible on any 1440p monitor, so I avoid 1080p like the plague, but with FSR the image would look great, 'cos it's not a simple 1080p to 1440p conversion.
Imho, the feature of using it in the drivers could be revolutionary. Keep up the good work, guys.
TAAU support mostly benefits AMD (even though AMD doesn't seem to realise it). When they are throwing money at you, you know what's expected of you. Which is to say, don't support TAAU on PC.
They wouldn't use it, because they know the money would stop flowing and it's easy enough to come up with excuses for why it would still be too much work.
With Unreal Engine, TAAU being core and DLSS being a plugin it becomes kinda hard to come up with those excuses. But if only a few lonely voices on enthusiast websites who don't care about running afoul of AMD/NVIDIA marketing strategy speak up, it's still not going to happen.
It was updated for Metro EE. And 4A Games has made it clear that their TAAU is superior to FSR.
imo, it's a preview of the future, smarter pixels rather than raw power pixels. They are giving it away for free, and the support to GPUs of all eras and APUs -seen it running on a AMD 4650- along with it being open source is interesting to say the least. It's not a simple checkerboard, nor bilinear, nor something similar.
talking of DF review, 4k is nice and all, but I have a 4K monitor and I dont use for gaming at all, I just dont care, as I prefer higher framerates. Hope that when the tech is more mature, they mention other details and resolutions. The content they share is great, but there is more to it than that.
MS admitted themselves that the technology will be on Xbox consoles. In that sense it's kind of "exclusive", the greatest buzzword ever in the console gaming space. But being open source in July that compatibility doesnt mean much, I think. Sony is going to, and should implement it, 'cos in games where FSR works well you could see the Series S beating the PS5 to a pulp with similar image quality and better performance.
All consoles use various reconstruction tech for years now. FSR won't bring anything new into console space, and I don't expect many devs to suddenly start using it over their own or provided by the engine solutions.MS admitted themselves that the technology will be on Xbox consoles. In that sense it's kind of "exclusive", the greatest buzzword ever in the console gaming space. But being open source in July that compatibility doesnt mean much, I think. Sony is going to, and should implement it, 'cos in games where FSR works well you could see the Series S beating the PS5 to a pulp with similar image quality and better performance.
judging by the performance metrics + IQ I highly doubt it is working.
NThibieroz
Newcomer
4A Games had not evaluated FidelityFX Super Resolution; their corrected statement clarified this.
No mate. FSR runs on hardware older than Xbox one X. Ps5 will have whatever Xbox is having.MS admitted themselves that the technology will be on Xbox consoles. In that sense it's kind of "exclusive", the greatest buzzword ever in the console gaming space. But being open source in July that compatibility doesnt mean much, I think. Sony is going to, and should implement it, 'cos in games where FSR works well you could see the Series S beating the PS5 to a pulp with similar image quality and better performance.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
FSR is free to go on to the PS5.
It seems Exor is choosing not to use it for riftbreaker, and they're not telling why at the moment.
It seems Exor is choosing not to use it for riftbreaker, and they're not telling why at the moment.
They have a promotional partnership with MS I think? Makes them not being able to say things about PS5.
Flappy Pannus
Veteran
'cos in games where FSR works well you could see the Series S beating the PS5 to a pulp with similar image quality and better performance.
wtf
Thats the PR answer they were forced to make after the fact. The first thing they said is the actual correct response from them
You do realise you're replying to an AMD employee that actually worked on FSR, right?
I think he knows a little bit more about the situation than you.
