I think it did not so its job, hence the price reductions and bundling. MS should not need to take $50 off the console in its two largest markets and bundle its biggest title if the standalone game sold the console for them at MSRP. The bundle alone did not set charts on file, TF bundle was languishing out of the top ten on Amazon for weeks before the $50 deal pushed it a few spots lower.
What MS really wanted was everyone to buy a $500 XB1 and while they bought their $60 TF game. That's a $560 purchase, not a $450 purchase. Sony meanwhile is selling plenty of Infamous bundles in the EU, but they are more than the standalone PS4, not less.
Currently at Amazon for March. (TF bundle at #12).
In the UK, where the $50 drop is official, the TF bundle is #30 while the PS4 is at #19 (non-bundle) and #13 (Infamous) for March. Infamous bundle has been out for five days and is the top selling console for March. The infamous bundle also cost 30 pounds more than the TF bundle.
I guess maybe. Ok, TF combined with targeted price reductions seemed to do the job.
Amazon...it's nice but for example, February PS4 was #3 and XO was #23. That suggests to me I dont know, PS4 selling 3 or 4 times better. But the final NPD numbers they nearly sold the same hardware for February.
So it can easily be for example, #1 vs #12 means that TF bundle is outselling PS4 nationwide.
In Jan they were actually closer on Amzn. PS4 was #3 and XO was #16 IIRC. Yet that month PS4 won NPD much more handily.
In short, dont know. But it feels clear there's some level of Sony sway on the Amazon charts, even in any country.
Your post makes me reconsider from "XO will dominate March NPD" to, thinking it's more a tossup again though.