Er, I don't actually think I ever expressed that as a desire.Unknown Soldier said:Have to agree with Chalnoth here .. if i'm gonna buy a new SM3.0 part .. i'd like it to last at least 2-3 years before replacement.
Er, I don't actually think I ever expressed that as a desire.Unknown Soldier said:Have to agree with Chalnoth here .. if i'm gonna buy a new SM3.0 part .. i'd like it to last at least 2-3 years before replacement.
The Baron said:2. That the registry will go away.
3. That the registry will go away.
4. That the registry will go away.
Chalnoth said:I do have to wonder, however, what it is about the Windows registry that The Baron doesn't like.
Haha, given that this is a website/forum dedicated to the latest-n-greatest in turbo charged and super pretty graphics, this almost seems out of placeCartoon Corpse said:since i think game development should return to focus on gameplay. i HOPE that dx10 doesn't require a huge chunk of devs time budget to be spent 'developing' eye popping eye candy. seems alot of games are suffering from that...overly linear glossy splashy (though little innovation in scenery).
Got any references for that? I've not checked it out in much detail, but the registry seems to be alive and kicking under Vista for meThe good news is that unless something breaks, this will happen in Vista.
Enter, Windows DefenderPersonally, I expect Microsoft to move to a more secure version of the same basic thing.
Isn't that just for spyware, though?JHoxley said:Enter, Windows Defender
The repetitive clicking needs to be sorted, but otherwise, WinDefender has impressed me enough to consider it a feature worthy of upgrading for...
Jack
There are some fundamental differences between /etc and the registry. For one, if your registry gets corrupted you are hosed, end of story. If one file in /etc gets borked then you'll probably just lose a single service. Another is that the files in /etc are pretty easy to understand. Ever go through the registry and try to remove something by hand? You have to search for all the stuff relating to what you are removing, and it's often not easy to see that CLSID {5512D112-5CC6-11CF-8D67-00AA00BDCE1D} is related at all. Plus, the accessing the registry is far slower than accessing a single config file in /etc.Chalnoth said:Well, the registry is nothing more than a repository of configuration information. So there basically has to be something not too dissimilar from the registry in any operating system (In Linux, for example, it's the /etc folder).
Personally, I expect Microsoft to move to a more secure version of the same basic thing. My first guess would just be a registry that includes user-based permissions.
I do have to wonder, however, what it is about the Windows registry that The Baron doesn't like.
True, I've had this happen in Windows. It would be much more reliable to have a directory for the registry information (hell, it's got a directory structure anyway). The problem here is that the Windows registry, if ported to a normal directory structure, would be humungous, so you need to either live with the potential for damage, make frequent backups, or go with an entirely different structure (which I doubt Microsoft will do).OpenGL guy said:There are some fundamental differences between /etc and the registry. For one, if your registry gets corrupted you are hosed, end of story. If one file in /etc gets borked then you'll probably just lose a single service.
Well, the CLSID structure probably isn't going to go away. It's really convenient for dll's and whatnot. It would be nice, of course, if software developers would place stuff that power users may want to configure in more recognizable places (as nVidia does for their drivers).Another is that the files in /etc are pretty easy to understand. Ever go through the registry and try to remove something by hand? You have to search for all the stuff relating to what you are removing, and it's often not easy to see that CLSID {5512D112-5CC6-11CF-8D67-00AA00BDCE1D} is related at all. Plus, the accessing the registry is far slower than accessing a single config file in /etc.
WinFS? Had to scrap that if they wanted to get it out on time. Though WinFS is still being worked on, it wont be in the initial release.Jawed said:Wasn't Vista supposed to get a database-driven file system?
Jawed
JHoxley said:Got any references for that? I've not checked it out in much detail, but the registry seems to be alive and kicking under Vista for me
Rur0ni said:WinFS? Had to scrap that if they wanted to get it out on time. Though WinFS is still being worked on, it wont be in the initial release.
Blazkowicz_ said:I've actually a longhorn (well, vista) related wish as well :
let me run the 3D desktop with "Classic Windows" skin, with most useless effects disabled
and let me uninstall Windows Media Player..
psurge said:ChronoReverse, is the their an equivalent to the registry in Vista?