Pics look nice, but the bottom row of teeth and tongue really bother me. Something doesn't seem aligned correctly.
Hey let's not bemoan the bad dentistry of such a bygone era So judgy
Pics look nice, but the bottom row of teeth and tongue really bother me. Something doesn't seem aligned correctly.
Maybe the tongue was left as 'good enough' because you'll hardly see it and it will usually be deep in shadows?
Did AMD just "spill the beans" on XB1 having more ACEs than their desktop GPUs?
Mah also confirmed that the two GPU versions are compatible with the requirements of Direct3D 11.2 in the living room next Playstation 4 and Xbox One. Compared with the current series desktop GPUs Radeon HD 7000 and HD 8000 (OEM), console versions would offer much more Asynchronous Compute Engines (ACEs) to perform simultaneous graphics and compute calculations more efficiently.
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meld...ndig-zu-Direct3D-11-2-kompatibel-1938071.html
Someone who can speak German could probably give better translation than Google, though
:smile: Perhaps he is singing death metal vocals. Do you imagine having anyone singing like that on your face early in the morning with that breath coming at you?Hey let's not bemoan the bad dentistry of such a bygone era So judgy
What the bleep? I remember reading more than once that the Xbox One's GPU didn't have a lot of ACEs, especially compared to Play Station 4 GPU.Just realized this might fit this thread better:
Pics look nice, but the bottom row of teeth and tongue really bother me. Something doesn't seem aligned correctly.
The most accepted information I've seen so far is the disclosures from VGleaks, and the GPU information didn't go to a low enough level of detail to say either way.What the bleep? I remember reading more than once that the Xbox One's GPU didn't have a lot of ACEs, especially compared to Play Station 4 GPU.
The most accepted information I've seen so far is the disclosures from VGleaks, and the GPU information didn't go to a low enough level of detail to say either way.
There's still a good chance that the PS4 has the upper range of ACEs that was disclosed for Sea Islands. If Durango comes the next iteration of graphics IP, the other upcoming architectures may implement ACEs in groups of four, which is by default more than the two in initial GCN cards.
I don't know if it has changed but the last time I looked it was 16 Queues in 2 Pipes for compute. Can't remember now if that was the default value for GCN or not.
Just realized this might fit this thread better:Did AMD just "spill the beans" on XB1 having more ACEs than their desktop GPUs?
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meld...ndig-zu-Direct3D-11-2-kompatibel-1938071.html
Someone who can speak German could probably give better translation than Google, though
Rough translation:heise.de said:Mah bestätigte außerdem, dass die beiden GPU-Varianten in den kommenden Wohnzimmerkonsolen Playstation 4 und Xbox One kompatibel zu den Anforderungen von Direct3D 11.2 seien. Im Vergleich mit den derzeitigen Desktop-GPUs der Serien Radeon HD 7000 und HD 8000 (OEM) böten die Konsolen-Varianten wesentlich mehr Asynchronous Compute Engines (ACEs), um gleichzeitige Grafik- und Compute-Berechnungen noch effizienter auszuführen.
Rough translation:
Mah also confirmed, that both GPU variants in the upcoming game consoles (lit. living room consoles) Playstation 4 and Xbox One would be compatible with the Direct3D 11.2 requirements. In comparison to current desktop GPUs of the HD7000 and HD8000 (OEM) series, the console models (would) offer substantially more Asynchronous Compute Engines (ACEs) to carry out concurrent graphics and compute tasks even more efficiently.
As 3dilettante already said, with the GCN1.1 tech level the ACEs come in groups of four (1 MEC). It was theoretized before, that the single compute block in the Durango block diagram could refer to such a MEC (4 ACEs, 32 queues) while the PS4 has 2 MECs (8ACEs, 64 queues).
Doubling the number of ACEs to four and multiplying the number of queues with 16 to arrive at 32 queues in total would definitely be "substantially more". But as no concrete numbers were mentioned, we are left with the interpretation of what "substantially" (or in German "wesentlich", a closer literal translation would actually be "essential", but it doesn't fit that well in this context, there are a lot of synonymes with very close meanings as also the case in English; after all, the interview was probably done in English, it's just a guessing game, which exact word was used in the first place, and it doesn't matter in the end) means in this case. Even +25% could easily be a substantial change in other cases. So in the end, it says nothing more than that there are more than the two ACEs and two queues which was the standard for GCN1 GPUs. I wouldn't be surprised if Durango features 4 ACEs and 32 queues just like Kabini.So whats "substantially more"?
Doubling the number of ACEs to four and multiplying the number of queues with 16 to arrive at 32 queues in total would definitely be "substantially more". But as no concrete numbers were mentioned, we are left with the interpretation of what "substantially" (or in German "wesentlich", a closer literal translation would actually be "essential", but it doesn't fit that weel in this context, there are a lot of synonymes with very close meanings like in English) means in this case. Even +25% could easily be a substantial change in other cases. So in the end, it says nothing more than that there are more than the two ACEs and two queues which was the standard for GCN1 GPUs. I wouldn't be surprised if Durango features 4 ACEs and 32 queues just like Kabini.
Probably yes to the Kabini/Bonaire question (but the block diagram shown at the presentation shows only 2 ACEs, but the initialization code for some free Radeon drivers mentions 4 ACEs/pipes with 8 queues each).Isn't Bonaire same as Kabini with 4/32, and that's definitely 7000/8000 (OEM) series card?
Sea Island gpus, which I am guessing are the 8000 parts can sport 8 pipelines with 8 queues per pipeline. So whats "substantially more"?