This is insane. Two weeks ago people were convinced it was down clocked and now we are convinced its up clocked. 75mhz seems meaningless anyway, i"m surprised ms would do it.
There's still that AnandTech article that says that a 25% overclock would require a 66% increase in TDP.
That was for Jaguar CPU's.
And even then I recall working the actual watt numbers in play and they seemed to come in reasonable on a 2ghz Jag regardless of raw percentages. IE like going from 15 watts to 25, latter is a huge percentage increase but still seems quite manageable (though I dont remember the exact numbers).
Jaguar Vanilla
* 1.8GHz LC Clocks (can be under-clocked for specific low-powered battery device needs - tablets, etc...).
* 2MB shared L2 cache per CUs
* 1-4 CUs can be outfitted per chip. (i.e. 4-16 logical cores)
* 5-25 watts depending on the device/product. (45 watts is achievable under proper conditions)
PS4 Jaguar with chocolate syrup.
* 2GHz is correct as of now.
* 4MB of total L2 cache (2MB L2 x 2 CUs)
* 2 CUs (8 Logical cores).
* idles around 7 watts during non-gaming operations and around 12 watts during Blu-ray movie operations. Gaming is a mixed bag...
What would be nice is a fully loaded Jaguar chip.
No one's convinced of anything, we're awaiting confirmation - but it seems more likely than the downclock rumour (which now seems to be FUD spread by CBOAT and parroted by a bunch of other 'insiders' - no one else outside GAF had heard of it).
Basically, eastmen seems to be telling the truth about what he's heard and unlike say, Reiko and his story, it's been made aware to me that a completely unrelated source seems to be hinting at the same thing.
His reason for why they can get away with an upclock seems quite plausible too:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1761963&postcount=4375
Similarly, with the 12 GB of DDR3, there are murmurings that MS is seeking dev feedback on the amount of RAM, with 12 GB apparently an option and someone else is also telling me 12 GB is a real possibility and not as difficult for them to implement as you may think.
Plus, as i've said before, the biggest complaint by devs working on XB1 was about the large system reservation - so it's not like they have no impetus to increase the memory.
So for both rumours, there are two independent sources - I'm waiting on more confirmation though which maybe will turn up by the end of the week
That was for Jaguar CPU's.
And even then I recall working the actual watt numbers in play and they seemed to come in reasonable on a 2ghz Jag regardless of raw percentages. IE like going from 15 watts to 25, latter is a huge percentage increase but still seems quite manageable (though I dont remember the exact numbers).
No one's convinced of anything, we're awaiting confirmation - but it seems more likely than the downclock rumour (which now seems to be FUD spread by CBOAT and parroted by a bunch of other 'insiders' - no one else outside GAF had heard of it).
Basically, eastmen seems to be telling the truth about what he's heard and unlike say, Reiko and his story, it's been made aware to me that a completely unrelated source seems to be hinting at the same thing.
His reason for why they can get away with an upclock seems quite plausible too:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1761963&postcount=4375
Similarly, with the 12 GB of DDR3, there are murmurings that MS is seeking dev feedback on the amount of RAM, with 12 GB apparently an option and someone else is also telling me 12 GB is a real possibility and not as difficult for them to implement as you may think.
Plus, as i've said before, the biggest complaint by devs working on XB1 was about the large system reservation - so it's not like they have no impetus to increase the memory.
So for both rumours, there are two independent sources - I'm waiting on more confirmation though which maybe will turn up by the end of the week
Something else is implied by 12 GB, a 384 bit bus which increases main memory bandwidth to 102 GB/s. The 384 bit rumor has been bounced around many times, although I have no idea if that comes from separate rumors or just echo chamber.
Yes, it was ( difference between Kabini A-5000 and Kabini A-5200 ):
4 Jaguar Cores from 1,6 ----> 2GHz
2 CUs from 500 MHz ----> 600 MHz
tdp from 15w ----> 25w
Without the CUs what are we talking here, of a 8 jaguar cores cpu at 2GHz with a tdp of 30-35w ?. That´s not out of this world IMO, and i suspect that at E3 many developers were waiting for final kits ( check Infinity Ward claims for example ) of both Sony and MS in the hope of a beefer cpu...
Remember ( not saying is true but not imposible ):
Something else is implied by 12 GB, a 384 bit bus which increases main memory bandwidth to 102 GB/s. The 384 bit rumor has been bounced around many times, although I have no idea if that comes from separate rumors or just echo chamber.
Your quote about the jaguar 4 core + 2 CU offers an explanation for the weird 14 +4 design for the PS4 GPU. Now things make a lot more sense. The GPU could be 16 cores with 2 redundant CU. Makes much more sense the 18 CU. If that is truly the case, then its 12 CU versus 14. An upclock of 15% for XB1 now gives CU parity on the GPU.
I would think that they could blend in some 8Gb ddr3 memory chip, if those chips actually exist, I've no idea, I made a real quick search and with people writing GB, Gb or gb as if they were the same the results I got for Google...plausible too:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1761963&postcount=4375
Similarly, with the 12 GB of DDR3, there are murmurings that MS is seeking dev feedback on the amount of RAM, with 12 GB apparently an option and someone else is also telling me 12 GB is a real possibility and not as difficult for them to implement as you may think.
Looking at the Xbone enclosure, the cooling solution, I guess if yields are good and/or MSFT feels it has no choice but to have a couples of technical "wins" vs SOny and wash the PR disaster that was the unveiling of the system with some good news, well I guess the system could deal with quite some more Watts at the expense of noise (fan noises).
I agree that it might be insane, but...
Two weeks ago X1 was a DRM trojan horse
Head of IEBM was still Don Mattrick
So, who knows what further sacrifices they are willing to make
Apparently the whole Don Mattrick case is part of the re-construction of Microsoft - he was expecting a big job which never got promised so he left. According to latest rumors are giving current Windows chief Julie Larson-Green all of the hardware department(s) too.
isnt the 256bit memory controller lies inside the apu ?
if so how can they change it this late
?
There's still that AnandTech article that says that a 25% overclock would require a 66% increase in TDP.
Also MS already said that XBO will have 8GB.
What's the point of having more slow DDR3 anyway?