VGA Silencers are pretty popular for a reason, and it ain't noise.hovz said:adding a plane engine on top of a card isnt improving it. some of you people are ridiculous.
hovz said:pc999 said:ATI claims that X850 XT Platinum edition will end up twenty per cent faster than Geforce 6800 Ultra in 3Dmark05, almost forty per cent faster in Far Cry and around 55 per cent faster in Unreal Tournament 2004. Those numbers come from ATI.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19816
bullshit
no ones talking about it because its a stupid pointless release. if this is soley about improving availability why even 'release' them. just put them on store shelves when they are available under the same name as current boards. a 20 mhz core increase isnt even worth a new name.
Bjorn said:geo said:This has been referred to repeatedly as an "availability refresh". That means yields will be significantly better. That also means that there will be a significantly higher percentage of stellar overclockers.
The larger cooler is there for a reason though. So i'm not so sure that it will be a better overclocker.
Nappe1 said:hovz: cool down a bit. ( here right now it would be pretty easy... finnish gulf of baltic sea getting some ice about 20 meters from my apartment... ) I think you have made your point clear by cursing all ATI users to Dante's lowest step. (and as I am now using the search, it seems that your objectivity has a sort of twist... well, anyways..)
nVidia has been a slightly faster (average. Ati is faster on HL2 and nVidia on Doom 3, but these aren't the only new games.) on this season, so ATI did what any manufacturer should do: reacrt the competition by dropping the prices of older cards and bring a new model that tries to reach closer to leader, even if the upgrade is small. (anyone thought that 25MHz increase on 16 pipelines is same as 100MHz increase on 4 pipelines in fillrate and 4 pipes were regular stuff just over a year ago.)
two slot cooler solution on ATI card as well was going to happen eventually. IMO the chip makers are still going way much faster than semiconductor business on development and that causes heating problems getting higher, which needs again better cooling.
hmmh... it has been a quite long since I commented HW thread last time... maybe it''s my ignorance nowdays towards to the whole business. two men game is boring to watch.
I'll give this a shot over the holiday weekend and report back; shouldn't be hard to test at all...CJ said:What I'm more interested in... could someone downclock their X800XT PE to 400 Mhz core and leave the mem at 500 Mhz and then run some benchmarks? I'm curious to see what to expect of the X800XL which is said to be $349... can it really compete with the GF6800GT?
You're unnecessarily confusing yourself here. You should quantify clock differences by percentage, and not by MHz deltas.Nappe1 said:(anyone thought that 25MHz increase on 16 pipelines is same as 100MHz increase on 4 pipelines in fillrate and 4 pipes were regular stuff just over a year ago.)
THANK YOU!!!!Luminescent said:Its really too bad for those with AGP motherboards.
hovz said:ostol, theres nothing wrong with improving yields with a new process. but when you actually launch a product as if its some great new chip when in reality it will probly be 4 or 5% faster than the previous product, its an insult to customers. funny you mention them being cheaper to purchase. if im remembering correctly atis msrp of 549 is the highest they have ever placed on a video card. i sure as hell would pay a $550+ to have 4 more fps in ut2k4.