aaronspink said:
DaveBaumann said:
It primarily means that you'll have to measure from a much closer distance than the standard 1m.
Aaron Spink
speaking for myself inc.
True, but there are difficulties with moving closer as well.
Since you want to test the card under load, moving the mic closer to the gfx-card also moves it closer to other noise sources in the system. While you may get a high enough reading to register, it doesn't help with isolating the contribution from the gfx card unless you go very close, but that emphasizes the most important difficulty with moving closer which is directionality. While many HSF setups can be assumed to be the most noisy from the side of the chip/sink/fan, some new and interesting designs have this area shrouded and evict the air out the back of the case. This would tend to lower the noise measured from the side, but increase it from the back. There are other problems as well. So in order to reduce directionality concerns, as well as better mimic actual use, I'd prefer if the measurement was made outside a closed case at some semi-reasonable distance. The standard 1 m would be OK I guess. However, this would bring its own can of worms
* What cabinet is used? How open to air carried noise, how prone to resonances?
* How is it placed in the measurement environment? Open, or with a reflecting/dampening wall behind it?
Plus of course the fact that this requires a more sensitive SPL-meter, (as well as possibly lower ambient noise).
While the sub-20db measuring rigs are probably a bit too expensive for Dave's tastes unless he can find a second hand B&K, it might be worth it to look around for something more sensitive than this 40+ dB job, as it would make measuring a fair bit easier.
Still, it's damn fun and interesting to have an SPL meter and measure stuff, so if he can't return this device, he might as well get some mileage out of it by getting aquainted with the ins and outs of SPL measuring. Take readings in various rooms, the car, office environments, the neighbours dog, whatever. He can try various ways of testing - what this device can let him do, and where it fails him. Get some hands on experience with resonance and standing waves. Think through the issues. Fire off a mail to the guys at silentpcreview, and ask them for a bit of advice. Try some new stuff, and mull it over some more.
Then he can start thinking about how or if he would really want to approach the problem of getting good information to his readers, and what new equipment that would require, if indeed any.
I'm really glad to see you taking an interest Dave, and I'm sure you'll find it very interesting.
Plus I'm sure you'll enjoy having a near silent test rig.