Perhaps because they get better yields by enabling more SPs than by raising clocks?
The G92 Architecture Rumours & Speculation Thread
- Thread starter Arun
- Start date
- Status
Perhaps because they get better yields by enabling more SPs than by raising clocks?
I am suggesting that is what they're doing. The GTS 640MB as we know it is through, and the 112SP part will surely be faster. A factory overclocked part may perhaps match the old 640MB, give or take, but close enough.
I'm also with the people whom summize the 8800GT may be a cut-down version of something already, perhaps a 6 TCP part, a or a higher-clocked version will be used for something else (gx2?).
I don't know, that would just be my reasoning behind the pricing, discontinuation of the GTS's, and the revamping for the 112SP part. Why else do it?
What is the general consensus about the amount of streamprocessors in G92?
64 to 96 ?
But then again, are we talking of stream processors with the same computational abilities as their G80/G84/G86 predecessors (lets suspend -marketing- reality for a minute and consider the G9x moniker as being the recipient of any relevant update on that piece of technological development since the G8x days :smile
?
OMG, you are the devil !
I can't believe someone would actually fall for a quick MS Paint trick job, despite being warned in advance of that fact.
Don't spread rumors anymore, otherwise Fuad, Charlie and Theo won't shut up about it for a month.
Last edited by a moderator:
OMG, you are the devil !
I can't believe someone would actually fall for a quick MS Paint trick job, despite being warned in advance of that fact.
Don't spread rumors anymore, otherwise Fuad, Charlie and Theo won't shut up about it for a month.
Collage
[Brick_top]
Newcomer
And ofcourse you always play the popular game 3DM06.
It seems R6xx still isn't doing too hot in DX10 vs G8x with the most recent driver sets both with and without AA - http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=461&type=expert&pid=4
So that 3dmark score might really be irrelevant unless there were hardware issues with R600 that were fixed in RV670 that contributed to driver optimization woes.
vertex_shader
Banned
Does that change anything when it comes to expectations of R600 performance in the next six months?
You might wanna up that...
Does it mean that NVIDIA currently has a GPU with 128 or more Shader Processors??
If this chip really exists why there is no info about it when there is so many info about G92??
EDIT: I thought about G9x series GPU with 128 or more SP
Last edited by a moderator:
OCW has information about shader-domain of 8800 GT:
64SPs@ only 1.2GHz? 1:2 ratio on a late 2007 GPU? Or 6 cluster, with a higer tex-power in comparison to ALU-power than any other G8x-SKU, which wants to compete against 480GFLOPs MADD card?
Or just NVs misinformation-tactics?
64SPs@ only 1.2GHz? 1:2 ratio on a late 2007 GPU? Or 6 cluster, with a higer tex-power in comparison to ALU-power than any other G8x-SKU, which wants to compete against 480GFLOPs MADD card?
Or just NVs misinformation-tactics?
- Status
Similar threads
