D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
You have to factor one very important element while doing this type of comparisons. The Windows drivers for Intel integrated graphics are horrible, not just bad.
Yes, the SGX535's windows drivers seem to be cutting its potential performance in half, based on numbers from other platforms.
And I honestly believe the NGP may be faster than C-50 at 3D rendering (in an utopic environment where the OS's cpu/memory overhead is neglegible, driver optimization is ideal, resolution and quality settings are the same). At least if DX11-specific performance optimizations aren't being used.
What shocked me was NathansFortune's bold statement:
NGP is more powerful than any Fusion product currently on the market and draws less power at peak. x86 is wholly unsuited to embedded portable products.
Any Fusion product involves E-350. That's implying the NGP is "more powerfull than" a dual 1.6GHz Bobcat + 500MHz Robson + 8.5-12.8GB/s bandwidth UMA. Not to mention it's a system that'll have, at least, 2GB of total RAM memory.
Unless the A9's are clocked way higher than 1GHz and\or the SGX543MP4 is clocked way higher than 200MHz, I have a really hard time believing it.
Last edited by a moderator: