Sony VR Headset/Project Morpheus/PlayStation VR
They make the sensors in pretty everything that needs a sensor to take pics. Not sure about the lenses.
They make their own line of glass, G Lenses, and also collaborate with Zeiss.
Sony created array of lenses for HMZ T1-T3 home cinema viewers. They also do same for digital binoculars [which also use same 0.7" 720p full OLEDs].
Are you suggesting PSVR tracking is better than either Oculus or Vive? If so I'd be interested in seeing the source for that as everything I've read so far suggests PSVR is the least accurate of the three.
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
I think you misread MrFox's post, he said PSVR was probably the lowest cost tracking solution based on what's known. It was the lenses he was speculating are somewhere in the middle.
Speed reading?
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
The first time I read it the same way I think pjbliverpool did.
Yes, everyone seem to agree the move controller from 2010 is the least accurate of the three. I haven't seen any negative comments about the headsets tracking, said to be solid as long as you stay in the cameras limited frustum, occlusion is an issue for oculus and psvr, while vive is much better on both aspects.
The move is $25 right now on amazon. That's why I don't think we will get a revision until next gen, it would mess up the price point. Besides, millions of us already have the move controllers anyway. If they make a revision, it would be nice if the old model remains compatible.
If they make a new controller I want gloves.
The move is $25 right now on amazon. That's why I don't think we will get a revision until next gen, it would mess up the price point. Besides, millions of us already have the move controllers anyway. If they make a revision, it would be nice if the old model remains compatible.
If they make a new controller I want gloves.
have this video been seen?
seems the Move controllers is laggy, or its the TV thats laggy?
it seems the TV output itself add lag, because the head movement also become laggy. should be no problem because its view-only (for the tv).
Yeah, TVs can add anywhere between 16ms and 150ms. Also the external box probably adds 16ms for the unwarping buffer. So with the headset being 18ms, this would look a minimum of 50ms lag. That could be way above 100ms if the TV has frame interpolation enabled, or isn't specifically set to "gaming mode".
http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-test-results/input-lag
The only way to know would be to count the frames.
Regardless, it looks like the Move is showing more lag than the headset, or maybe it's more noticeable only because of the twitchy movements, like what he does with the soft drink @1:13. Or maybe because headset can use reprojection, while motion controllers logically have to go through the entire game engine path.
Last edited:
Yep, currently on travels with only partial internet access via phone. Apologies for the confusion.
PU creates latency for TV stream when it re-projects one fisheye half of a screen into one normal looking [cropped] 16:9 image. That plus TV latency = lag on TV. For user who wears headset, everything is fine.
whats nice about the vive is the light houses are small and only need power.
Oculus constilation requires power and usb access for each sensor
But will the Leds really cost that much on the headset ? they should be really low power . Also the IR blaster in the sensor should be pretty cheap also.
Sony doesn't have to worry about room scale and the ps camera is pretty cheap.
A lot of the rumors about Rift on the xbox one is that it will use Kinect instead of the IR sensor stands
VR on xbox would really help multiplatforms, it's kind of a missing link (along with a less stupid price point).
At Facebook's earnings call, Zuckerberg was asked about Rift preorders, he said:
In October, they said they'll be capable of producing 100 Rift per hour. It doesn't add up to more than a niche for 2016. A lower price points for VR on both XB1 and PS4 would sells a lot more, and with Vive added, the total would be a nice start for 2016. Multiplatforms would really have something to chew on.
They started in June I believe however. So 100 rifts an hour , say 12 hours a day ? . That's 1,200. So they could have something like 432,00 for launch.
I know Kinect is more than up to the task . I doubt the xbox is. They would need some heavy voodoo and a much bigger breakout box with a gpu that could hopefully do crossfire over usb3 lol .
That's pretty niche. A lack of competing software may make it attractive to devs, but otherwise you're targeting 400k OVRs versus 50 million consoles versus 50+ million gaming PCs versus a gazillion mobile devices. Targeting OVR would be like targeting Ouya.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
Do big chinese factories stop during the night?
Honest question. I thought that keeping up with the production demands were so important that they would simply change shifts between their employees.
Honest question. I thought that keeping up with the production demands were so important that they would simply change shifts between their employees.
Similar threads
