jolle said:CAN such extrapolations be any accurate at all btw?
or is it just plain waste of time?
L233 said:Again, THE NUMBERS ARE NOT REAL, THEY ARE EXTRAPOLATIONS based on the R420 specs and R360 benchmarks.
Rage3d.de is the German branch of "ATI Fanboi Central" and the pathetic fucktard who hacked up this "preview" just deliberately made up the these "benchmark" numbers with some bogus calculation while masturbating to renderings of ATI's Ruby.
We gonna get some skinny come Monday homey? :|Vengeance said:I guess we will all just have to wait and see. It wont be much longer now. 8)
digitalwanderer said:We gonna get some skinny come Monday homey? :|Vengeance said:I guess we will all just have to wait and see. It wont be much longer now. 8)
Hellbinder said:Besides the X800pro numbers are way to low anyway
(let alone the X800XT hehe)
Hellbinder said:Besides the X800pro numbers are way to low anyway
(let alone the X800XT hehe)
Geeforcer said:Hellbinder said:Besides the X800pro numbers are way to low anyway
(let alone the X800XT hehe)
I'll just quote that for future reference, if no one minds.
So then you must not find the Nv40 numbers to be *really good* either.?Evildeus said:Didn't find those extrapolation really good appart for the XT.
DaveBaumann said:IMO. NV40 vs R420 = "scrap".