It'd have to be a software issue. It believe it was a quick port from some other games console.Vysez said:On tonyh_2_logos.bmp, it seems that it lacks texture perspective correction on the ceiling.
Is that a software or hardware issue? In this case, of course.
sunscar said:Alright, that's more like it, some specs. The high-end is a little higher in geometry, but what are we talking about in an actual gaming environment? How much of that power can it maintain?
Guess that really depends largely on the CPU coupled with the device, CPU/GPU dependancies, engine design, and concern for power consumption. Could be interresting though, to say the least.
Later
Iridius Dio
Simon F said:It actually can do higher than 4FLOPs/cycle .. the 4x4 matrix mul in 4cycles should be evidence of that.
Panajev2001a said:Simon F said:It actually can do higher than 4FLOPs/cycle .. the 4x4 matrix mul in 4cycles should be evidence of that.
Well, but if that operation in particular is hard-coded we would not gain more than 4 FP ops/s performance when doing Matrix vs Vertex or dot products and other similar operations.
Simon F said:It actually can do higher than 4FLOPs/cycle .. the 4x4 matrix mul in 4cycles should be evidence of that.
Well, obviously, there are some differences or else it wouldn't be suffixed with "lite" (Ughh. I hate that spelling).Ailuros said:Simon F said:It actually can do higher than 4FLOPs/cycle .. the 4x4 matrix mul in 4cycles should be evidence of that.
Even better. No idea if you can answer that question yet I'll still try:
Are the specifications between VGP and VGP Lite identical as being illustrated above?
Simon F said:Panajev2001a said:Simon F said:It actually can do higher than 4FLOPs/cycle .. the 4x4 matrix mul in 4cycles should be evidence of that.
Well, but if that operation in particular is hard-coded we would not gain more than 4 FP ops/s performance when doing Matrix vs Vertex or dot products and other similar operations.
Yes... that's what I just said. The spec quoted above is somewhat conservative.
[Edit] AH! Just re-read what you actually wrote. I assume you actually meant to write; "but if that operation in particular is hard-coded wouldn't we gain more?"
I am referring to DP4.Panajev2001a said:Yes, but in the case of that particular operation being quite hard-coded then in all other kinds of work-loads (not Matrix * Matrix operations) we would not gain more (unless what you hard-coded in the 4x4 Matrix multiplication can help multiplying a Matrix with a Vertex).
Fox5 said:So do we know of any PDAs or any other devices that may be using these chips? I'd sure like one.
Intel demonstrated a new PDA running 3D games using an Intel 2700G multimedia accelerator at their technology showcase. The new Intel 2700G multimedia accelerator is a low-power graphics accelerator for mobile PDA devices. It supports 3D graphics with the ability to process nearly 1 million polygons per second - ideal for handheld 3D games. It also supports dual-display which makes it very flexible for presentation on large screen monitors. Besides that, it also support MPEG-2, MPEG-4 and WMV9 formats.
FWIW, the 3D core is an MBX-Lite.Ailuros said:Fox5 said:So do we know of any PDAs or any other devices that may be using these chips? I'd sure like one.
Strike 1: Intel Carbonado
Nite_Hawk said:Kristof/Simon:
Are there/Will there be OpenGL drivers ready for the eventual linux ports for PDAs that use this gfx chip?
Nite_Hawk