There is rumor that PS4 neo may utilize a new CPU. Jaguar 8 cores with only 2.1 GHz may become severe bottleneck for the neo GPU.Nobody was talking about outperforming a console releasing a year later, neither a change in arquitecture when devkits have already been shipped. Bump in frequency or a bit of more ram at most.
With all the pc benchmarks I've seen lately it's really unreasonable to expect a 4-6tf console to run 4k game comfortably especially without i7 level CPU. It's really 980 ti territory.
It's just wishful thinking. Replacing the CPUs would require re-working the entire chip, not just slotting in a beefier GPU.There is rumor that PS4 neo may utilize a new CPU.
Yes, neogaf's source (?) said there are 2 prototypes of neo, not the same APU.It's just wishful thinking. Replacing the CPUs would require re-working the entire chip, not just slotting in a beefier GPU.
From tapeout to retail chips, including engeeniering samples, etc takes around a year, so... Highly unlikely, next to imposibleYes, neogaf's source (?) said there are 2 prototypes of neo, not the same APU.
You forgot the leather seats and lamb skin wrapped wheel.there will be two versions of Neo, the standard one with jaguar CPU, and the deluxe edition with a supercharger and 20" alloy wheels.
Sony will just sell one system, it'll be upgradeable online with a firmware update, for a fee XDthere will be two versions of Neo, the standard one with jaguar CPU, and the deluxe edition with a supercharger and 20" alloy wheels.
The situation is like NX. Currently its development kit uses Tegra X1, but a lot of people including digital foundry expecting NX will use Tegra X2 finally. It may just because new SOC is not ready for early development kit.From tapeout to retail chips, including engeeniering samples, etc takes around a year, so... Highly unlikely, next to imposible
The sad thing is: Neo nor Scorprio would have happened if both the Xbox One and PS4 had been on equal ground sales wise. Because Microsoft got it wrong and PS4 is pulling away as much as it is; Microsoft is faced with the situation that they must bring out something that is better to not lose too much image wise. Meanwhile, Sony is also forced to counter that, or else they could be left behind.
I still think these two upgrades are bad for the market as a whole and as pretty much an early adopter on all my consoles so far (sans PS3 because of the HD transition), I am not even sure I'll get the Neo in whatever form it launches. I'm just that happy with my PS4. :/
there will be two versions of Neo, the standard one with jaguar CPU, and the deluxe edition with a supercharger and 20" alloy wheels.
And it should remain that way.As for the rumours regarding a new Vita? We honestly have no idea how they started
This reminds me a scene in the first "police academy" involving a thrown away apple starting a riot...I...
I maed dis?
http://www.pushsquare.com/news/2016/08/a_new_ps_vita_is_on_the_way_dont_believe_everything_you_read
And it should remain that way.
I wouldn't expect that to be true either, why would you pay for two architectures to be developed and then only use one of them? That truly doesn't make sense.
But what other amd options are available now for sony if they want to ship the neo in oct.I'm pretty sure many console designs get significantly different prototype ramifications during the earlier stages of development.
Reportedly, the Dreamcast had a prototype candidate with a 3dfx GPU, there was a 3DS with a Tegra chip, there was a PS3 with no GPU and 2 or more Cells, the PS4 had a 4GB version, etc.
With the APU between the PS4 and Neo being so different (not just some incremental upclocks), I wouldn't be surprised if there was more than one "APU candidate" for the later, even with both coming from AMD.
Of course, if Sony could delay the decision over either APU towards as late as E3's Scorpio announcement is a whole other story.