It goes beyond anectdotal evidence at this point. Some will name call as posters in this thread have done, but the links I posted have a number of reputable people in the community noting availability.
I think it is palpably obvious based on the sheer number of individual sources making the same claims that there is availability, and not just one or two stores. I don't doubt regional differences or the fact that they are still hard to find. But it clearly is not as in such demand as the other consoles were at launch.
But this does not explain why certain people over-react. The Kotaku article does have a controversial title.
Even with anecdotal evidences, what do we want to conclude meaningfully at this point ? In the first place, at US$599, is it supposed to have the same demand as other console ?
People lined up waiting OVER 24 hours for PS3s. The PS3 launch date was well known, before Nintendo released their date. The magazines covered it, it was all over the news--big sites like CNN, MSNBC, etc--and every gaming site was covering this.
It does not mean Sony spent lot's of marketing $$ to achieve the awareness. The only ones I have seen are the 1111 Japanese commercial and 2-3 Playstation websites. Most media would report the launch date and the PS3 queue on their own (without Sony spending a single cent). BUT this is just awareness. There are other forms of marketing that can help to sustain PS3's demand (Well, they can still do them now).
This compared to MS's Ring of Light, Origen, and other viral marketing programs. What about the MTV and the 100 lucky (early) Xbox 360 owners. All these were done to generate the awareness and the *desire* to buy an Xbox 360. They are obviously driven by MS.
On the supply side, PS3 has limited availability in the first month. Some potential buyers may have bought another console, or are turned off by the buying experiences.
The Xbox 360 shipped 1.5M units in CY 2005 and there was a larger demand than supply in 2005 (with demand beginning to stabalize with supply by late winter/early spring). Units were picked up quickly in CY 2005.
1.5M was for worldwide. I think in NA, the numbers were 900K shipped/sold (some were probably in transit).
Sony is trending toward fewer units in CY 2006 compared to MS in CY 2005. I am not sure where your comment about ability ti supply quanitity comes from, but from every report Sony has FEWER PS3s this year than MS had Xbox 360s last year.
In your post, you mentioned the 360 drought lasts until late fall/early spring. I'm commenting on the early spring part (because I was looking for one then, but decided to pass due to all the overheating reports). At this point, if Sony is delivering sufficient quantity to NA retail, then they should have no problem sustaining and stock piling from now until early spring.
Considering the fact Sony has like 5x as many fans and a strong Japanese support base Sony should have no issue selling more units, quicker, than MS or Nintendo.
Sony has already sold more PS3 than 360s in Japan, after price adjustments from both sides. In US, I think their fumbling will cost them something. Don't know what yet. As for Wii, how does the historic trend in traditional consoles apply to Wii today ?
The fact is Wiis, with more units, are harder to find and we are starting to see PS3s sitting on shelves. Not many -- but enough to raise eyebrows. And I think the answer is simple.
The answer must also take into account Wii targets a broader base ? And does Wii selling out have anything to do with PS3 selling out (or not) ? (i.e. Assuming Wii is not launched this year, would PS3 still sell out or not ?).
It isn't because people don't want PS3s--they do.
It isn't because the Wii is viewed as a better product--I don't think gamers think that.
It isn't because people seem them and don't think of picking one up--I think they consider it.
It isn't due to lack of games--the PS brand is a monster.
It isn't because the PS3 is going to fail--not even close.
It isn't because of Ebay--the Xbox 360 got nailed last year too and yet people still picked them up.
It isn't because of perceived value--the PS3 is viewed as faster and with more technology.
I think the primary reason is price.
And the secondary reason is related, and it is competition. The Xbox 360 was the only NG system last year. This year Sony has to compete with the 360 (with comparable games and cheaper) and the "different" Wii which is a lot cheaper.
Yes, these are good, possible explanations but my point is let's wait until after the official number before we arrive at any conclusion.
I agree with XBD -- demand for the PS3 IS there. I don't think these units will sit for a week.
Why not ? Like I said, we have not really concluded anything yet just by these individual sightings.
We agree on many point, others we diverge. That is how I see it. I could be wrong, but then again I have watched PS3s sitting on shelves and people look at them and then move on.
Sure, but it doesn't tell me anything I don't already know. Some people will pass... at US$599.99 and especially in Walmart. It doesn't tell us how many people will get to the systems once they found out about them. It also doesn't tell us how well/badly the online sales are doing (They seem fine).
Selling out in 5 hours (PS3) or selling out in 10 minutes (Wii) is good either way. And one could argue that the Wii demand is more image driven and is subject to change depending on how future games come along (i.e. this falls demand was largely driven by the hardware and NOT the software) whereas PS3 demand will only continue to grow as software becomes available and supply channels strengthen. Personally I think cost is a huge concern, but I do so strong PS3 demand until at least after the Spring Euro launch.
/end unpopular opinion
Regardless of whether your opinion is popular or not...
Again, price is a (partial) function of value. You can either argue that the price is not right or the perceived value is not high enough. All I'm saying is Sony marketing has failed to address the issue.
And most importantly, let's wait for the numbers.