WHAT?????!?!!
And the US store got it yesterday, not sure about EU.
WHAT?????!?!!
Haha...good one. That shit has to keep coming up even when the game is out for all these months? Konami made a fuckton of money already and there's no way that Kojima will give his blessing for an Xbox port. Needless to say if they did it without his permission or involvement, fans will start an outrage, that is including me. No more MGS shall be made without Kojima's incentive.
Is there a basis for your belief that Kojima would not want it on other platforms? As far as I know, the game is not 1st-party funded or subsidized.
Haha...good one. That shit has to keep coming up even when the game is out for all these months? Konami made a fuckton of money already and there's no way that Kojima will give his blessing for an Xbox port. Needless to say if they did it without his permission or involvement, fans will start an outrage, that is including me. No more MGS shall be made without Kojima's incentive.
Firstly, the graphics... I was expecting better, from all the hype.
From what i've seen in the demo, why do people think this can't be done on a 360? Fitting the cutscenes/levels on DVD would be the only problem I could imagine.
This partial adherence to realism is what really turns me off. When you have a game that is nearly an interactive movie, it had better be a good movie.
While the premise of a global economy fuelled by war is definitely interesting, the games frequent insertions of the bizarre (ie. when the walking handycam starts dancing, or Liquid Snake's amputated arm somehow takes over Ocelot) destroy the suspension of disbelief, and pull you out of a world that is otherwise well crafted. As I am not a big fan of manga/anime or even the generic action blockbuster movies, you can understand why the game is not my cup of tea.
Its called post-modernism. Secondly some things that seem to be supernatural you discover they arent necessarily supernatural when you progress in the game but have logical explanation. But I wouldnt like to spoil it for you in case you decide to rent it.
This series lends I believe a lot from work such as George Orwell's and is inspired by today's events including the power of propaganda, psychology of the masses, globalization, para-states and para-governments, etc.
MGS4 isnt considered great as one game. Playing one game from the series wont do justice. There is a reason why some gaming media say that MGS4 came after 15 years in the making. Usually when you play one game whether it is a sequel or the first it can be judged as a separate game. The MGS games regardless of the number next to each episode, are all chapters of one single vision. Playing MGS4 only is like reading the final chapters of Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. It wont make you like it as much as it should. They are considered 3 books but it is actually one story chopped to 3 parts. This is similar with MGS4. If I didnt play the previous games I might have not liked it. But MGS4 is like a progress of the MGS game I bought years ago. Finally I could play further into that game.
I think your point is crucial. Gamers like myself, with no nostalgia of the series won't see the game in the same light as the devoted MGS fans.
And apparently the story had gotten quite convulted over the years (they hired Ryan Paxton to gather the loose threads), and appears to be not even internally consistent (unlike LOTR).
eg. I remember someone posting about how Vamp turned out to be a cyborg (retcon?), like Raiden, however this removes the explanation for his water walking ability (ie vampirism).
(they hired Ryan Paxton to gather the loose threads)