Bagel seed
Veteran
Mattrick was just a PR pawn. ESRAM guy needs to be brought onstage for a lifetime unachievement award.
Mattrick was just a PR pawn. ESRAM guy needs to be brought onstage for a lifetime unachievement award.
MAG was broked IMO. Warhawk would make a much better basis for a game. I think it enjoyed far greater and longer lived popularity. 256 player* Warhawk++ instead of the mess of MAG.
* although I don't really understand the appeal of 256 players, because you only experience a tiny part of the game so it's like 16 vs 16 or 32 vs 32 in your little corner of the map.
Google shows Warhawk dev is abandoning consoles for mobile. http://lightboxinteractive.com/studio/
Mattrick was just a PR pawn. ESRAM guy needs to be brought onstage for a lifetime unachievement award.
Last gen they used edram but with wide graphics memory as the main memory
"Wide" might be a generous description.Last gen they used edram but with wide graphics memory as the main memory.
MAG was broked IMO. Warhawk would make a much better basis for a game. I think it enjoyed far greater and longer lived popularity. 256 player* Warhawk++ instead of the mess of MAG.
* although I don't really understand the appeal of 256 players, because you only experience a tiny part of the game so it's like 16 vs 16 or 32 vs 32 in your little corner of the map.
Google shows Warhawk dev is abandoning consoles for mobile. http://lightboxinteractive.com/studio/
Starhawk's build and battle was okay but had a duff implementation, and didn't work great for competitive multiplayer (I think all these game designers overestimate the gaming populace when they design their awesome teamwork games!). It was great fun in coop though when you could build a castle, but then Lightbox gimped that and took the game we wanted to play away from us. Yay for 'updates'.
But keeping this more on topic, for announcement we might well get someone offering newer, bigger battles. It won't be Lightbox. It also won't be Zipper Interactive, makers of SOCOM and MAG, as they've been closed. Who would develop such a game?
Googled Sony Bend to here: http://www.psu.com/a021664/Sony-tea...-Molecule-PS4-games--epic-panic-extraordinary
"Epic" is perhaps the huge shooter, that I guess comes from Santa Monica. "Panic" would come from Bend who are making "Kill Strain", and "Extraordinary" sounds right for MM given what we've seen.
My prediction is more detail on these three games.
There could be more stuff to show, but the whispers in the corner all indicate MS has secure one big 3rd prty title
I expect two bombshells at MS's conference, and one at Sony's. Atleast that's what I'm hearing on the exclusive's end
From Thuway:
I'm not sure it's in Microsoft's best interests to buy out more 3rd party games. It's only going to hack off the larger population of PS4 owners.
I'm not sure it's in Microsoft's best interests to buy out more 3rd party games. It's only going to hack off the larger population of PS4 owners.
Shouldn't they instead have spent more on 1st parties?
Edit: I can see it happening though.
What??
Would you say that paying for exclusivity for games originally planned to be multiplatform woos gamers on different systems?
Example: if Microsoft paid for COD to appear on their system alone (which I don't think even MS can afford), it wouldn't make me, a PS4 owner, more inclined to buy their system. It will probably annoy me and many other PS4 gamers immensely. If you consider that there are more people playing PS4, that's a larger proportion of upset gamers.
wtf ...
So, in this universe of yours, it's all about getting people to come back from PS4 and not getting sales from the 100+ million gamers that haven't bought a console yet?