Can we rely on SSDs to last five years?
You can if you have no virtual memory, if unused pages can't be swapped out, then a lot of apps start using tons of memory.As mentioned elsewhere, these don't require great gobs of RAM. You can't really use up 3 GBs on OS and apps. That much capacity is needed for data. If this console is going to serve multiple high-def video streams to various devices, it needs a damned fast HDD/SSD more than huge amounts of RAM.
Can we rely on SSDs to last five years?
Even if the Xbox 3 hass 5GB (8GB - 3GB OS reserve) it isn't Xbox 5GB vs. PS4 4GB * -- unless a 4GB PS4 has a magical OS that reserves NO OS footprint. And seeing as Sony was bit this generation with OS reserve issues (first bloated and now, it seems, not enough space and CPU reserves for a full suit of features) that if Sony ever desires to have feature parity they will need a large OS reserve as well. Which could be actually more detrimental; e.g. 5GB (8GB-3GB OS) Xbox3 versus a 3GB PS4 (4GB-1GB OS) creates a MASSIVE gap again. 2GB of extra game space is a lot -- over 66% difference.
* This assumes the PS4 won't have 2GB.
You can if you have no virtual memory, if unused pages can't be swapped out, then a lot of apps start using tons of memory.
The thing I dont understand is we have the the leak specs for both x720 and ps4. Ps4 looks way more powerful but we had LHerre state the x720 will be more powerful than ps4. Maybe PS4 is/was at 2GB when he stated this.
The thing I dont understand is we have the the leak specs for both x720 and ps4. Ps4 looks way more powerful but we had LHerre state the x720 will be more powerful than ps4. Maybe PS4 is/was at 2GB when he stated this.
Well he did "mention" PS4 was still changing, though I don't know what all could change to gain more power without adding to the cost.
I still so far feel he focused mainly on the memory.
Also lherre is not stating Durango>PS4 that I know of in a good while. He agrees with the Durango=more RAM+lesser GPU assessment.
What do we know about this individual?
From an industry "fan" perspective for nearly two decades (but not a developer by any means) when I see 8GB and 2-4GB I don't immediately go, "Oh, the 8GB is much more powerful!" There are far too many examples historically. In fact you ask basic questions like, "What is the bandwidth? Are there other memory technologies like eDRAM top accommodate low bandwidth?" And so forth. Easier to developer for I can understand, but stating the amount of memory makes something a lot more powerful raises eyebrows as it is far too simplistic of an approach.
If he cannot make a basic assessment like "MHz and Core count don't dictate how fast hardware is" or "more, slower ram doesn't make something faster" etc then his leaks are almost useless.
If on the other hand he has shown himself to be tech savvy then I am not sure we should jump the conclusion that, "Well, he MUST be focusing on the larger amount of RAM" because that would put him into camp #1 and thus we are back to stage 1, really.
I understand these boxes are evolving past just game machines, but I still think this is such a horrible waste of resources.
As mentioned elsewhere, these don't require great gobs of RAM. You can't really use up 3 GBs on OS and apps. That much capacity is needed for data. If this console is going to serve multiple high-def video streams to various devices, it needs a damned fast HDD/SSD more than huge amounts of RAM.
I still dont see "way more powerful". If you get the extremes, one will have a 1.8x GPU while the other up to 4X the RAM. I see them as somewhat even from here at this time. All that ignoring the possible CPU parts of the equation.
Also lherre is not stating Durango>PS4 that I know of in a good while. He agrees with the Durango=more RAM+lesser GPU assessment.
ms targgeting 8970 level, where sony targetting 7970 level
Looking at Rangers post it sounds like he's backed off of that.
Is it new comments and clarification or is it refinement and analysis by other posters interpreting and mixing with other sources (e.g. yourself)?
No lherre not mention it,
actuaaly the xbox next gpu could be the better than ps4
indicatiing with more leak on xbox side, lately focusing ms devkit
is not final and ms targgeting 8970 level, where sony targetting 7970 level
considering sony finacial, and recent job list indicating sony just 2 year into
nextgen development, where ms already 6 year in development
so 2 year vs 6 year R/D
ms will create exotic gpu design as like xbox 360
sony will use off the self component just like vita
Virtual memory is considered a no-go on console boxes. Console devs like knowing that if they ask for a piece of memory, they will get it in a very predictable way. If you ask for some ram and hit a page fault, you got yourself a stutter right there.Implies no built in HDD in Durango though, which would seem odd for such a supposedly media box focused thing (but a good idea imo, to at least have SKU's both ways like 360). If they (you ) are really shooting for 299 with profit and all that, it's hard to imagine 8GB and HDD fitting into the budget both. Then again the leak docs mentioned a decent amount of built in flash storage IIRC.