Playstation 5 [PS5] [Release November 12 2020]
- Thread starter BRiT
- Start date
Thanks to CPU boost. GPU probably isn't (or not fully). AC Unity shows this very well. In areas where the PS4 game was CPU limited, the game is locked to 60fps on PS5. But the game has big framerate drops during GPU heavy (well heavy for PS4 at 900p) moments.
Besides Division 2 and Breakpoint use DRS so the FPS is stable, but the resolution is very low.
Kugai Calo
Regular
Gotta say, the shrinking of the heat sink poses far less of a concern than that of coil whine. The power supply coil whine on some units completely cancels any effort spent on acoustic design. I wonder if the new model has fixed this.
On my unit the coil whine is the loudest while playing Genshin Impact, which is curious, as we thought Astro’s showed the upper limit of PS5’s power draw, apparently Genshin draws more?
On pc, coil whine doesn't go linear with power. It have a sweet spot where the whine is the loudest. I assume ps5 is the same.
Unfortunately most human are unable to hear coil whine, so I don't think it's a high priority for them to fix it. If it gets fixed, it could be just a coincidence of they using different components.
So it also could means the revised PS5 will have no coil whine or different coil whine range
Kugai Calo
Regular
Oh that could be why.
If you had heard a coil-whining PS5 coil whining under Genshin Impact you would not say that. On my unit the whining penetrates through the game audio and the sound of my fridge in the other room, it’s not higher pitched than what I’ve previously heard while playing Astro’s or SM:MM - it’s hard to describe but definitely more noticeable. This is a bit of a concern: with more game to be released, who knows how much worse the coil whine can get?
I wish Sony come up with a proper repair program for this, right now replacement is like lottery drawing a second time.
Edit: I’m not alone with the Genshin Impact coil whine
https://www.resetera.com/threads/genshin-impact-makes-my-ps5-coil-whine-like-crazy.419175/
See the comment of this Reddit post
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
Is does nor feel like this is that widespread. I have a Series X and was expecting a fairly low-friction improvement in performance for older games but a bunch of classic Xbox games (e.g. Gears and Fable) not only don't run better but in some cases are running worse than running the same game on old hardware. I really hope Microsoft unlock their FPS boost tech to more games but it's something of a blunt instrument, boosting FPS at any cost. E.g. if you run Fallout 4 on Series X in FPS Boost mode, the game will fallback to 1080p/60 with reduced graphics settings including draw instance, but if you use a 60fps mod you can run 4K/60 with the usual graphical settings.
PS5 is not any better but you keep your expectation to games hitting their target frame rates then you'll be happy. Some games - notably more recent Sony first party games (HZD, GoW, Easy Gone, TLoU2, GoS) have legit 60fps patches but the rest of your experience will vary. I was really happy with Ubisoft unlocking Assassin's Creed Odyssey to 60fps on PS5 and I bought some DLC for this game.
True that. My stick has been laying there unused for over a month now. I've been fondling and looking at that beauty long enough now, it needs to be put into action already Sony!
Good video. Numbers start at 5:20.
I appreciate that the presenter noted the minimal sample size and his luck in both units having the same fan model. The memory temp was actually a NAND module temp, as he noted in the description.
The different power draws are more interesting than the different temps, IMO, even though the temp differences were much greater (~40 vs ~50°C). Old unit drew 0-9W less gaming (DMC5, ~200W), but 0-5W more “idle” (home screen, ~50W).
Last edited:
Due to the VRMs and DRAM (edit: NAND) also having lower temps and not just the SoC I think we can eliminate hardwarebusters getting lucky with the silicon lottery. This heatsink redesign is simply superior despite the lower weight.
My only reservation is that they didn’t really show how they measured soc temps. So I have no actual idea how accurate it is. It’s promising, of course, but this is the first time anyone (?) has provided soc temps, so they should have spent more time explaining how they rigged that up.
He says in a comment that he measured the SOC temp from the back of the board, so it isn't so much an accurate reading of the SOC, but the PCB below it. But if he measured both systems in the same way, it should be a fair comparison. I'd like to see more also, though.
Also, the comments are turning into the dumpster fire you would expect.
D
Deleted member 86764
Guest
Similar threads
- Locked
- Deleted member 7537
- Games Industry
- Sticky