This is motherfuckingly painful...no, really, I actually was craving to finally have an AMD CPU:http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3153&p=11. WTF?
So what's stopping you from having one?
This is motherfuckingly painful...no, really, I actually was craving to finally have an AMD CPU:http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3153&p=11. WTF?
So what's stopping you from having one?
Don't get your hopes up.
You're not gonna like this...
I sure hope so. Though the fact it has had quite a few respins already and still haven't reached the clock speeds advertised nearly a year ago is troubling.Zaphod said:I certainly hope they have both some tweaks/respins up their sleeve
That could happen, though it won't be that good for AMD financials.Zaphod said:well as killer bundle pricing for OEMs with these things
I am sorry, but guys over at Tom's must have really had a lot of fun over at Tahoe because that conclusion page takes putting lipstick on the pig to a whole new level.
Bastards aren't even trying anymore. How dare they shovel this shit on my doorstep. "oh, but it's *native* quad-core and it's a long-term investment" FUCK THAT! I want something that performs now, not an over-priced and under-performing POS that will allow me to eventually upgrade to something that *might* be competitive.
I've been giving them the benefit of the doubt and standing up for their lack-luster products over the past year+ in the hope that they'd finally get things right with the Spider platform. So much for that.
AMD just lost a fan, and more importantly, a customer that is rather influential in his circle. Looks like it's all Intel + NV for me and anyone that I give advice to from now on.
Hold the presses...the goddamn sky must be falling-are the horsemen free?Are you actually pissed enough at AMD to...gasp...go to Intel+nV?Something similar happened to Hellbinder IIRC.
Well the future is still unknown, there can always be surprises.
Well the future is still unknown, there can always be surprises.
If they actually manage to ramp the currently pitiful clock-rates, and have enough fat to trim from their margins per chip in order to allow them aggressive pricing(the first one is up in the air, the second one is really doubtful), things could turn out OK-ish. What is worrisome is that I don't really see them making a lot of money from Phenom, and making money is something AMD desperately needs. Ironically, the 790FX and other 7 series chipsets may turn out to be more successfull. Time will tell, I guess.
Can't believe they are still using the SB600 until early next year. Tom's Hardware is talking about how futureproof PCIe 2.0 on Spider is going to be, when it seems the first ones on SB600 won't even have it.
It's hard to sell the platform when the CPU is lack-luster at best. I'm so far beyond disappointed with AMD right now, I'm actually disgusted.
Full PCIe 2.0 support is in the north bridge.
The 9600 is pretty competitve to the Q6600 and they cost the same.
I think everyone would agree that we would all like to see 3ghz + chips, but it looks like they are comming latter. So you either buy one of the expensive QX modals or you wait, or have fun OC'ing a lower spec intel or Phenom for the time being.
For people that are building a rig today, you can't go wrong with Spider. Mainly thanks to 790FX. It's much cheaper than x38.
Look man, I know you know that I'm one of the biggest AMD fans around. How can you continue to support this company when all they do is fail? I gave them at least a year of leeway in the hope that they'd turn things around and return to competitiveness at the high-end, but they have utterly failed at this and look to do so at least until Bulldozer/R800. Why should I spend my hard-earned money on an under-performing and over-priced platform?