Old Discussion Thread for all 3 motion controllers

Discussion in 'Console Industry' started by betan, Jun 2, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Prophecy2k

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,468
    Likes Received:
    379
    Location:
    The land that time forgot
    Since it says, "while a further 4.5 per cent highlighted motion control technology in general as a significant step forward for the industry this year." I could assume the question was related to the perception of either motion control device being a "step forward" for the industry or motion control of video games in general terms.

    In that regard the results would be rather expected since many see the Sony motion controller as a modest evolution of what Nintendo has already done with the Wii, while what MS is doing with Natal seems a bit more out there and revolutionary.

    Since we don't know what the question was, i'm not sure we can take anything from the results of the survey though. However, if anecdotal evidence from my friends, posters on internet forums like B3D/Gaf etc and mainstream media coverage is anything to go by, i'd say that you'd most likely be right in implying that there seems to be much more "buzz" & "anticipation" for Natal than there is for ARC.

    Since Sony's delayed till Autumn though, both them and MS have most of the year to start really hyping their products. We'll just have to wait and see how things pan out.
     
  2. obonicus

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,939
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe it'll mean including a wand in the box (haha).
     
  3. obonicus

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,939
    Likes Received:
    0
    If it's Natal, Wand or <x>, there's like 40% of respondents we don't know about. If it's

    Natal, yea or nay?
    Wand, yea or nay?

    then it doesn't look terribly positive for anyone (but vastly worse for Sony).
     
  4. wco81

    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Messages:
    6,920
    Likes Received:
    630
    Location:
    West Coast
    wouldn't mind if both Sony and MS fail with this motion-control things if such failure accelerates the transition to the next gen.
     
  5. Silent_Buddha

    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    19,426
    Likes Received:
    10,320
    Aye, I always thought a spring launch for the PS3 wand was a bit rushed, I'm glad they took stock of the situation and properly moved it ahead a bit to give their devs a chance to hopefully put out some compelling content.

    This years E3 is shaping up to possibly be quite interesting.

    Regards,
    SB
     
  6. Squilliam

    Squilliam Beyond3d isn't defined yet
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    3,495
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Hmm the only issue I can think of thats a problem for Sony with the 'Arc' in comparison is that even though they can pick up Wii ports im very unsure of many ports which would do well to even be ported from third parties, taking a game from the Wii to the PS3.

    Im not sure that having a wand like the Wii's is strictly beneficial over say a camera only interface because the industry as a whole has done a pretty poor job with the Wii's system thus far.
     
  7. Shifty Geezer

    Shifty Geezer uber-Troll!
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    44,106
    Likes Received:
    16,898
    Location:
    Under my bridge
    Well, PS3's solution is more like wand++ in addition to camera--; not as capable as Natal, but more sophisticated than Wii. PS3's motion developers won't have Nintendo to compete with either, so a flop on Wii could do well on PS3. Whereas a port to Natal may not work so well (we still don't know how well the limb tracking is as to whether Natal can execute the input of Motion+, plus I don't think it can). PS3's actually in the strongest position to offer worthwhile games IMO, but I think Natal will have the wow-factor and win popular opinion. But anything can happen with the software. MS's 'casual' software like 'In The Movies' have been pretty dire, so it remains to be seen if they can create worthwhile content that'll sell Natal. Sony OTOH have a mixed record, with the success of EyeToy Play and the flops of lackluster sixaxis efforts, but at least they have some precedent to making attractive titles.
     
  8. Dural

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    326
    Likes Received:
    44
    You're in the movies wasn't an MS game, it was just bundled with their camera. It will be interesting to see what Rare and BigPark (MS seems to have acquired them primarily for Natal and XBLA development) have in store for Natal.
     
  9. Shifty Geezer

    Shifty Geezer uber-Troll!
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    44,106
    Likes Received:
    16,898
    Location:
    Under my bridge
    It was commissioned and published by them though, like Gears, no? Likewise Lips. MS uses 2nd party studios instead of 1st party like Sony, but it still needs to control the quality of its software. AFAIK everything 'casual' in MS's portfolio has been pretty dire, so they'll need to pull about a complete turnaround in that respect. That said, they may have some joy from 3rd parties who support them well, and may well create an independent killer app or three.
     
  10. obonicus

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,939
    Likes Received:
    0
    It was published by Codemasters, but distributed by Microsoft.
     
  11. scently

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    563
    Spawnpoint are also making NATAL games. I think this will be the real test for Microsoft as a content creator/provider, they do seem committed to make it a success. I am also curious to see what Sony creates with the ARC, as I have been impressed by their first party products.
     
  12. Shifty Geezer

    Shifty Geezer uber-Troll!
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    44,106
    Likes Received:
    16,898
    Location:
    Under my bridge
    Okay, "In The Movies" isn't quite the MS flop, but they certainly didn't offer any compelling reasons for XB360 owners to go get the camera!
     
  13. makattack

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Messages:
    352
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Boston, MA US
    I only got the camera because when I picked up my 360 last year, it came packaged with an XBox Live Gold 1 year subscription card. I've only used it in Burnout Paradise, which takes a photo of your face during a crash. Silly really... A wee bit more useful are the titles which map your face as a texture on a playable character. A bit eerie though.
     
  14. obonicus

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,939
    Likes Received:
    0
    From what I hear on the internet, Uno is a pretty good reason, if you like live sex teleconferencing.
     
  15. Crossbar

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    12
    If you want to have your USB hub behind your PS3 it´s not that hard to pull a cable to the back in a discrete fashion. If you have rockband, then you are screwed anyways so no need to bother.

    On topic, wasn´t really hard to see the wand delay coming. No media of any kind just a few months before launch is not how these business work. I guess we will never know whether there were hardware or software that caused the delay. My guess both.

    There may also have been marketing reasons that pushed it forward as well, I expect the wand to be aimed more towards the Wii buyers attracted by motion games. This spring there are some iconic titles coming like FFXIII, GOW3 and GT5 aimed at traditional gamers that will attract new PS3 buyers. May have been hard to have an efficient marketing effort covering all bases.
     
  16. zRifle1z

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    1
    IMHO, there is no delay. I don't think Sony realy intended to ship the controller this spring, and only used that date for PR during E3.
     
  17. Crossbar

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    12
    You may be right, but the leaked SEGA document said Sony planned to release the motion controller in Japan in March. In case they didn´t intentionally misinform their business partner March may have been their best case scenario in August last year.

    But plans can change due to many reasons just like MS removed the CPU from the Natal camera.
     
  18. Rangers

    Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    12,791
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    I certainly didn't expect it. It was obviously too early.
     
  19. corduroygt

    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,390
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm speculating an internal motherboard revision of the slim, maybe an even cheaper blu-ray drive, maybe even 45nm RSX if they can manage it, to reduce costs, so they can include the motion controller with the $299 unit, and sell a "core" unit for $249 (or less) without motion control, and they couldn't hope to make those changes in time for Spring yet, but possibly for Fall. Maybe even the elusive rear USB port (I just use a 7 port hub and tuck the cable to the rear)
     
  20. RobertR1

    RobertR1 Pro
    Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2005
    Messages:
    5,852
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    Looking forward to E3 and see what MS has to offer for Natal. E3 will be make or break for me as to if I pick it up in Fall.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...