SenjutsuSage
Newcomer
I'm not worried about it "simply being". I'm okay with it as a feature. I'm wondering why it is required. I'm not worried about them storing pictures for the government. I'm worried about them storing pictures for UA. What happens if there is a false reading? Will I not be able to log in to my XBL account? Do they plan on identifying people and items in my living room for targeted ads? These are things that I would find annoying.
Cell phones, ipads, etc don't use cameras like this. They are typically hidden devices with cameras that can be disabled.
Also I'm worried that they are going to force Kinect for UI. ERP just said its likely going to required for use in most games. I'm not interested in waving my arms and talking to my hardware.
Maybe you don't think these things are a big deal, but I do and I'm not alone. Look, I'm not saying that MS is definitely going to use Kinect in this manner, but these are questions that need to be asked and answered when Durango is presented.
Well, using the dual shock and analog stick additions to the first playstation controllers as an example, ERP may indeed be correct. However, unless the game is a mostly Kinect focused title, I just don't see it dominating or crowding the traditional controller out of the gaming experience, so not a big concern there. Most games supporting it can simply just mean that more developers think of interesting ways to use it as an extension of the controller, and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if people end up liking some of it to a large extent. Not a big concern there either.
I tend to think most developers are smarter than gamers give them credit for. What kind of false reading are you referring to exactly? What precisely could a Kinect camera ever see you doing that would warrant your being locked out of your XBL account? You realize just how high the burden of proof would have to be for someone's account to be banned, or for you to be reported to the authorities in any form? If what you're thinking about sounds a little too crazy and extreme, then I'd say the chances of it happening are slim to none. Relax. Microsoft aren't that insane.
Identifying people and items in your living room for targeted ads? I suppose better than ads for crap you don't care about, right? But, playing devil's advocate, god forbid that the new Kinect could recognize that you own an Ipad and would show you some advertisement for the smartglass app or something, or if it could tell that there were 6 people in a room (which I believe it can) and then it would show an ad for some kind of party game or movie that multiple people might enjoy playing together or at least watching together, would that really be the end of the world? If you're going to get ads anyway, and you know you're going to get ads, wouldn't it at least be less annoying if there's a chance the ads have a greater probability of actually being something you might actually be interested in?
For example, I was recently in the market for a new keyboard, but I didn't just want any keyboard, I wanted a really nice mechanical keyboard that made nice loud clicks when I hit the keys and it also needed to look pretty damn good, too. I regularly visit a few anime/manga forums, and right at the very top of one of my favorite forums one day just so happened to be a really nice looking keyboard for sale on amazon that seemed to fit the bill perfectly: The Razer Blackwidow Ultimate. But shortly after I clicked this ad, the same ad started to show up on other sites that I visit often, even some popular gaming forums like GAF. I doubt this was by coincidence, so I'm left thinking that clicking that ad on one site stored something on my computer, I don't know, but it ultimately led me to purchase it because I was never made to forget about that nice looking keyboard I saw. That was probably a rare case of targeted advertising that worked and was actually helpful.
It's just about the only time in my life where I've ever found an online ad useful. I can find ads as annoying as the next guy a lot of times, but I wouldn't exactly be opposed to steps being taken to somehow make the ones I do see more relevant to me and my interests.
It isn't like this would ever be used to personally identify you with any particular group. At best it would be no different from how Microsoft and other companies gather anonymous information on how people use windows and other products. The most controversial thing by far about the new xbox would be if it somehow didn't allow offline gaming. Other than that, I don't see what we have to be worried about with this other stuff.
For Microsoft's sake it better be groundbreaking as they won't be able to sell their console on poweror unique graphical capabilities this time around. If the leaks hold true, they're going with unremarkable hardware this generation, so quite honestly whatever they're planning with Kinect is going to have to be nothing short of miraculous. Because aside from Kinect, there isn't much left to Durango to talk about.
They didn't even sell the Xbox 360 like that... at least not anywhere close to the way you're thinking they did. Sony did more chest thumping on Power of the PS3, Cell Processor, blu ray and 1080p than Microsoft did on any individual part of the 360. Microsoft sold the Xbox 360 on the basis that it was simply much more powerful than the original Xbox with hi def gaming, they sold it with an improved Xbox live and they sold it with their games lineup and increased developer support. And guess what? Microsoft can again sell the new xbox as much more powerful than the Xbox 360, with an again improved xbox live, and again games lineup and developer support.
Last edited by a moderator: