And the delta in performance between multiplat games on 360 and PS3 was marginal, for the most part, after a few years.
I don't see how PC graphics cards are relevant. You seem to be saying that the difference in consoles doesn't matter because PCs crush both!?! If you care THAT much about graphics, consoles are an afterthought. May as well spend that money on an upgrade.
Ahh the never ending argument..."If you really care about graphics, you'll be on PC anyway". I guess it only changes which side uses it
He doesn't have to, he just needs to know which one is "the best at graphics". The word is out on that one, and it's only going to get stronger.
But he heard PS3 was stronger than 360, then he looked at the games that gen and noticed 360 looked just as good. He's probably confused and takes such things with a grain of salt, and or assumes all Sony/MS consoles are essentially the same power despite reports
I'm arguing against this but i actually pretty much agree with you. I think a big part of PS4's early edge has been it's power edge. Even if the average consumer cant see it, they hear about it.
One of the reasons it worked, is because it was (partly) true. On the last legs of it's life MP games are equal and the difference was very very rarely so bad as it is between the XB1 and PS4. We even have a few that just edges ahead of the 360. Sony played it smart, they had 1st party games that looked fantastic and could blame the developers for not using "the powers of the cell". The message was muddy thanks to that.
It wasn't as bad but for example in many cases there was a resolution deficiency against PS3, the very thing One is getting raked over the coals for.
So there may have been a common knowledge last gen that the best machine for MP games was the 360, but it was not as strong as it's going to be during this round (imho). And Sony had several tricks to offset the "weakness".
Basically agreed, at least that was public perception. I dont know that it was fair.
I am in the nothing is impossible camp, and i am certain that we will see some extraordinary 1st party games from Microsoft. But i am just as certain that it will be very very hard to shake off that expensive and slow feeling they are getting into. They will need to play cards like Sony did.. free multiplayer would be a great upset. In my book they are so behind on points that they will have to do something.
Yes it would be bizarre if MS ended up with the better looking exclusives this gen. In some cases I think some indications early actually pointed that way. It could be technically possible if the ESRAM is really great, but multiplatforms wont really use the ESRAM in cutting edge ways...
Price cuts on Xbox One though. That's really all you can say. It may take a few months...maybe sooner or later depending if Titanfall moves the needle. I feel safe saying you can forget free multiplayer. I doubt it really helped PS3 that much. If anything, put that money into lower upfront hardware costs. Better to sell a 299 Xbox One, than give away four years free online but keep the price 499. The former will do much better.