whipper snapper
Newcomer
The video these were capped from should be ready to download, around 30 minutes from now.
New Killzone screen grabs
- Thread starter whipper snapper
- Start date
The video these were capped from should be ready to download, around 30 minutes from now.
whipper snapper
Newcomer
Evil_Cloud
Veteran
I am not really exited about Kill Zone... Really don't know why that game would deserve all the hype. It does have potential though, but there's still a long way to go from alpha to gold.
whipper snapper
Newcomer
In the interview on the dvd, Guerrilla say the guns alone are made up of 10,000 polygons each 8)
10.000, huh? Hmm. Okay, well they better not be lying about it or there'll be hell to pay on the internet!
The video is very dark, the contrast is bad, it's blurry and blocky and it just doesn't look very good. Also, the guy playing the game is a moron. Hint: try killing the guy you're shooting at before moving on to the next target - you'll live longer that way...
The video is very dark, the contrast is bad, it's blurry and blocky and it just doesn't look very good. Also, the guy playing the game is a moron. Hint: try killing the guy you're shooting at before moving on to the next target - you'll live longer that way...
wow - *very impressed*
What impresses me more so than anything else in what we've seen so far of the game is most definately the movement and the attention to detail. The smoke effects are stunning, as is the animation of reloading or the part in which he shoots a grenade up to the second floor and you see the glass breaking very realistically as it explodes. The draw distance is superb outside with smoke and fire every where in the distance. Detail seems to be suprisingly high too (the green plants). The only thing I'm not too sure about is the framerate. If this they can get it running at constant 60 fps (as smooth as TimeSplitters2), I'll be very impressed. It's very hard to judge from the video, but I suspect it to be running at 30 fps, though it's really hard to tell if it's because of the capture. A video filmed of a tv running the game would be more indicative.
What impresses me more so than anything else in what we've seen so far of the game is most definately the movement and the attention to detail. The smoke effects are stunning, as is the animation of reloading or the part in which he shoots a grenade up to the second floor and you see the glass breaking very realistically as it explodes. The draw distance is superb outside with smoke and fire every where in the distance. Detail seems to be suprisingly high too (the green plants). The only thing I'm not too sure about is the framerate. If this they can get it running at constant 60 fps (as smooth as TimeSplitters2), I'll be very impressed. It's very hard to judge from the video, but I suspect it to be running at 30 fps, though it's really hard to tell if it's because of the capture. A video filmed of a tv running the game would be more indicative.
whipper snapper
Newcomer
Phil said:wow - *very impressed*
What impresses me more so than anything else in what we've seen so far of the game is most definately the movement and the attention to detail. The smoke effects are stunning, as is the animation of reloading or the part in which he shoots a grenade up to the second floor and you see the glass breaking very realistically as it explodes. The draw distance is superb outside with smoke and fire every where in the distance. Detail seems to be suprisingly high too (the green plants). The only thing I'm not too sure about is the framerate. If this they can get it running at constant 60 fps (as smooth as TimeSplitters2), I'll be very impressed. It's very hard to judge from the video, but I suspect it to be running at 30 fps, though it's really hard to tell if it's because of the capture. A video filmed of a tv running the game would be more indicative.
http://homepage.mac.com/earidogan/.cv/earidogan/Public/killzone.mp4.zip-link.zip
There's some of the game film on a big screen tv in this video interview with Guerrilla, it looks smoother IMO, 60fps?
Evil_Cloud
Veteran
Why the hell would they use numbers like that?
whipper snapper
Newcomer
And the big stationary guns use 15,000 and the hands are made up of thousands of polygons to. 8) I would like to know how many the game is pushing as a whole, 13 million, 15 million??? I've heard the later levels are spectacular, because has you progress through the game, the environments get more complicated and lavish in there design. Because you’re going after the big fishes, you start off fighting the cannon fodder who are at the bottom of the Helghast rank, and who sleep in those red containers you see in the slum level. In the rundown areas of the planet, right the way up to the top of the Helghast fighting machine where you'll fight the special forces, who have bags of fire power in graphically spectacular urban environments. 8)
In the rundown areas of the planet, right the way up to the top of the Helghast fighting machine where you'll fight the special forces, who have bags of fire power in graphically spectacular urban environments. 8)whipper snapper:
The reason you'll see such disproportionately high numbers for the guns and hands in a first-person shooter is obviously because those are details that always occupy the screen (and get seen from upclose), so the overall impression of the game's graphics will benefit a lot from making them complex.
PS2 hasn't realistically sustained that much. A geometrically strong game might sustain 7+ million, though.
The reason you'll see such disproportionately high numbers for the guns and hands in a first-person shooter is obviously because those are details that always occupy the screen (and get seen from upclose), so the overall impression of the game's graphics will benefit a lot from making them complex.
Evil_Cloud
Veteran
ChryZ said:
WRC3 pushed +20 million, if I read it right that is.
Before this thread derails to the usual PS2 & polygons bickering, the developer stated that the guns are made up of about 3500 polygons - he goes on to explain in the interview that because of the multi-layering they're using (up to 3), it hads up to about 10'000.
Anyway, the guns could have half the amount of polygons for all I care and it wouldn't be one bit less impressive. Thanks a lot for the second clip, the framerate seems to be very smooth and from the look of things seems to be 60 fps (during the interview, the developer has the joypad in his hands and you can see the screen in the background and how smooth everything runs).
Anyway, the guns could have half the amount of polygons for all I care and it wouldn't be one bit less impressive. Thanks a lot for the second clip, the framerate seems to be very smooth and from the look of things seems to be 60 fps (during the interview, the developer has the joypad in his hands and you can see the screen in the background and how smooth everything runs).
Sampling of the full PS2 library without bias to scene selection in a game - therefore a measurement of the performance typical to PS2 - puts the highest performers near 7.5M and most titles in the range of 2-5M polygons/sec. Naturally, a title can peak higher at times under certain game conditions as is evident from the developer claims.
Lazy8s said:
Can we "sample" the PC market with the same BS mechanic and come to the realization that we can run all our games with a Pentium2 and TNT? "Naturally", of course, "a title can peak higher at times under certain game conditions" but there are enough solitaires and non DX9 (or even DX8) games out there today to fix that.
From what I recall, Guerilla has stated that Killzone is "stable 30fps"--or at least that's what's being aimed at.
whipper snapper
Newcomer
Guerrilla haven't talked about the framerate. And OPM have reached an agreement with Sony for an exclusive demo for their August or September issue. The European incarnation.
The European incarnation. Similar threads
