Hey, have you guys seen this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re1EatGRV0w
The technology they patented a while ago is real!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re1EatGRV0w
The technology they patented a while ago is real!
Hey, have you guys seen this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re1EatGRV0w
The technology they patented a while ago is real!
Hey, have you guys seen this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re1EatGRV0w
The technology they patented a while ago is real!
Sure it's cool, and adding stuff to the periphery is actually a pretty big win, but how do you pack a peripheral like that into a reasonably priced box? and what's the requirement on the end user to set it up?
Well, in the end it's a low-resolution projector with a really large aperture, and a wireless connection no?
Wow!! Thats really impressive. I can see that being a strong competitive advantage if it becomes a feature!! Immersing!Since there was some talk could the "project images to room" be part of Kinect 2.0, it's been now demonstrated under name IllumiRoom.
It's said it's all realtime, no added effects on the video afterwards or some such
Intensity will be very low without a super bright, super hot, super expensive lamp. Just look up conventional projectors to gauge prices. I bought a short-throw 720p projector just before Christmas at a stellar deal of about £300. There's remarkable value, and yet it suffers from rainbow artefacts to the entry-level DLP implementation and I doubt would be suitable for such an environmental projection. I don't think any decent quality projector tech is going to cost less than $lots for MS to include.Well, in the end it's a low-resolution projector with a really large aperture, and a wireless connection no?
Since there was some talk could the "project images to room" be part of Kinect 2.0, it's been now demonstrated under name IllumiRoom.
It's said it's all realtime, no added effects on the video afterwards or some such
Intensity will be very low without a super bright, super hot, super expensive lamp. Just look up conventional projectors to gauge prices. I bought a short-throw 720p projector just before Christmas at a stellar deal of about £300. There's remarkable value, and yet it suffers from rainbow artefacts to the entry-level DLP implementation and I doubt would be suitable for such an environmental projection. I don't think any decent quality projector tech is going to cost less than $lots for MS to include.
I really don't think it's worth including in the discussion about next-gen hardware. I'm pretty sure there's already a thread to discuss the patent (Kinect thread?).
What if it is not like a standard projector but rather a device you place on a table between you and the TV? They can make the projection wide enough and it will not require a very hot bright lamp when its closer positioned to your front wall. Light density will be higher because of smaller distance
As ERP says, intensity is proportional to area (intensity isn't diminished with distance which is why a laser beam doesn't fade). Laser projectors are relatively cheap but still very low intensity. AFAIK there's nothing in the projector space that could provide a cheap, effective wall-to-wall image. And if there's any amazing new tech, it won't be used just for extended gameplay area. One of the projector companies, if MS if it's in-house, would release it and clean up as the perfect projector solution.What if it is not like a standard projector but rather a device you place on a table between you and the TV? They can make the projection wide enough and it will not require a very hot bright lamp when its closer positioned to your front wall. Light density will be higher because of smaller distance
3D projection is going to need a screen at least if you aren't using glasses. There's no way you can spray light onto any old surface and have each eye see something different reflected back.Texas Instruments is working on 3d without glasses. Imagine an autostereoscopic main display then having 3d glasses free projector spewing light all over your periphiral vision.
No it would still require a hot bright lamp, for all practical purposes (ignoring high gain screens) the brightness is inversely proportional to the projection area, doesn't matter where you put the projector.
Short throw optics are also not particularly cheap.
It's possible with some of the motion towards laser projectors, that something could be made to work, but I can't see it being cheap enough to be a pack in and as a peripheral, it would require software support, and the testing environment would be a pain in the ass for developers.
3D projection is going to need a screen at least if you aren't using glasses. There's no way you can spray light onto any old surface and have each eye see something different reflected back.
3D projection is going to need a screen at least if you aren't using glasses. There's no way you can spray light onto any old surface and have each eye see something different reflected back.