I would drive that line of thinking a little further and just see inevitability that Console hardware is going away and unless there is a massive technology switch that is super cheap and affordable. As long as there is a drive for more power and more graphical fidelity for games, these system power and cost to drive these graphics will go way above the mainstream console pricing.This strategy is a good way to eventually cement MS Gaming as a software and services business and move away from hardware. Xbox hw will be similar to the surface line and the focus now will be on pushing their software and services on as many devices as possible. Looking at the COD sales on playstation as well must be encouraging because MSFT makes money from that as a third party developer.
So these ads are the clearest indication yet that Xbox hardware is going to be very very niche if not eventually disbanded. We're possibly only going to have one more gen of hardware from MS if we're not yet on the last one. It’s a good strategy. My only concern is MS may try to force its game store onto Sony and Nintendo's hardware once its hw business is no longer consequential to them.
From a software development perspective I dont see this. There's always going to be a case for launching day and date on multiple platforms and a case for launching on a specific platform either fully or timed exclusivity(More so the latter moving forward). Its just such a relief developing using tools that work, whose documentation and product support is good with fixed hardware/single target spec. I had to develop an Android application for work sometime this year and it wasnt the best experience considering how fragmented it is compared to iOS even though I prefer Java/Kotlin to Swift. iOS development is still superior(even though today there are also a lot of devices). The same thing is true for game development, game developers will continue gravitating to where they can make the most money as well which have the best experience, so Sony who releases one target spec at the beginning that is the base for developing over an 8 year period.I would drive that line of thinking a little further and just see inevitability that Console hardware is going away and unless there is a massive technology switch that is super cheap and affordable.
Again I think this is where the Software Development Cycle comes into play now that games take longer to develop, and generations lasting longer, console makers can spend more at the beginning of the gen and recoup the costs as well as make profits. Sony's PS5 has been profitable since around a year after launch and you can see with the pricing of the Pro they're pushing more aggressive margins. All this at a time when they faced severe hw bottlenecks due to a global pandemic at the start of the gen. Thats why I think the next gen playstation will release quite later than people think especially now there's a pro. By December 2028 the technological gap between the PS5/pro and the PS6 will be unfathomable and much more economical for them to do than if they release it in 2026 or 2027. Add a guaranteed cross gen period which will boost PS5/pro game sales from 2028 till 2030 and Sony can easily recoup the cost of R&D for the hw. MS is primarily going to focus on Gaming as a service during this period and its already making them good money. And they can even possibly create a great SDK for multiplatform development. In all this I think its not a zero sum game. MS Gaming will be monetarily successful as well as Sony will make more money selling hardware, cloud gaming. Console hardware even for consumers isnt going away anytime in the next 16 yearsAs long as there is a drive for more power and more graphical fidelity for games, these system power and cost to drive these graphics will go way above the mainstream console pricing.
Devices not in that ad include Nintendo and Sony platforms. That's the rub, that Microsoft makes these ads and this all devices marketing, but at the same time try to say the Xbox console is relevant. They did this recently with the Indiana Jones reveal where they tried to only show it was coming to PS5 for a split second at the end of the reveal. Or how about when they started the year saying oNlY fOuR games are going to PS5, and they're not tentpole franchises (ie not Starfield), but by the end the year they're telling Bloomberg there's no red line for games releasing on other platforms. And so on.interesting perspectives here.
The way I see it, is this trying to get the word out that they may already be owning an xbox today with the devices that they have. So that they can jump straight into the ecosystem without needing to buy the hardware.
Spot on!! In as much as I didnt want this to be the case I think you're right but its at least good they're showing a clearer direction. They can pull it off successfully and make Xbox one of the best Gaming Services as long as they stay focused on that goal.Devices not in that ad include Nintendo and Sony platforms. That's the rub, that Microsoft makes these ads and this all devices marketing, but at the same time try to say the Xbox console is relevant. They did this recently with the Indiana Jones reveal where they tried to only show it was coming to PS5 for a split second at the end of the reveal. Or how about when they started the year saying oNlY fOuR games are going to PS5, and they're not tentpole franchises (ie not Starfield), but by the end the year they're telling Bloomberg there's no red line for games releasing on other platforms. And so on.
I stated before Microsoft strings consumers along until they abandon and pivot. It should be clear now. Why buy an Xbox console when everything (including Nintendo and Sony platforms) is an Xbox? Gamepass? What about when Gamepass is on all devices to increase that MAU number they so clearly only care about?
Consider this, on every platform other than Xbox you get all the perks of that respective platform (games actually released on that system on time, lead platform development, "exclusives", etc), and you get Xbox content. It is only on Xbox where you just get Xbox. There's no and when it comes to Xbox. They're accelerating plans to make nothing exclusive and available everywhere, again in the name of the MAU. And they're no stranger to dropping consumer products, making the consumer's investment a waste.
Therefore, if a user must have a console, it should be anything but an Xbox. You still get everything Xbox (coming soon TM), in addition to everything on your chosen platform.
And why should they? This is an ad to bring awareness to the xbox platform, not the opposing platforms. This is for the larger market on mobile devices at a young age who haven't a clue what xbox is or whether they should care about it, and now they are learning that they can access xbox content from the devices that they have.Devices not in that ad include Nintendo and Sony platforms.
Speaking about consoles, Spencer said that he loves that people are buying Xbox hardware, but notes that it isn’t a growth market. “Our biggest growth in Xbox players is on PC and cloud,” he said. “The console space all up isn’t growing, across all of them. We love those customers, but in terms of continuing to expand and grow Xbox, it’s about PC, it’s about cloud, ad it’s about making our games more available in more places.”
You guys are welcome to disagree but there’s a reason why everyone is just doing remakes and remasters. The young generation has no connections to these old franchises we grew up with. There’s a reason why Sony just remade everything while chasing GaaS.
You guys have phones, right? I keep saying this when people bring up trend chasing and GAAS, developers and publishers are going where the money is, because that's how they eat.You may not agree with MS, but I can assure you sitting around in 3rd place trying to take over first place in an industry on its way to death because prices cannot come down isn't the answer either.
Because it's a half truth. Everything is an Xbox, so we're bringing our content to those other devices you own like your Nintendo and Playstation consoles. The full truth that they are clearly aiming for, have communicated, have made moves towards, and won't just say it until they've wrenched the last bit of money they need out of existing Xbox console owners is all Xbox content will be everywhere. That is why I mentioned Phil's bloomberg comment, because in the span of just a year a few games going to other platforms becomes there's no red line what we'll put on other devices. So you don't need to buy an Xbox console when you can spend that money on the Xbox platform instead (PC, Nintendo, Playstation, phone, tablet, etc), and get all the same benefits plus what the other devices offer over and above Xbox.And why should they? This is an ad to bring awareness to the xbox platform, not the opposing platforms. This is for the larger market on mobile devices at a young age who haven't a clue what xbox is or whether they should care about it, and now they are learning that they can access xbox content from the devices that they have.
They didn't have a problem selling consoles during the Xbox 360 generation. There were plenty of exclusives and it was the lead development platform. With Xbox Series they bought up a bunch of studios and games to have the same exclusive pipeline and lead platform to drive console sales and drive up all variants of game pass. But they pivoted to putting that content everywhere instead. It's great for making money as long as the vacuum of the console sales stagnating (because now there's no value in the console) doesn't overtake those glorious MAU numbers.The issue I see, is that many of you don't actually see the challenge that MS faces. Had it just sat there in the console industry trying to same thing repeatedly, it would die a slow death. It's a pointless endeavour for them to chase the console market which is shrinking btw. Yea, are most definitely leaving the console market, but so will everyone else. MS getting out of the gates early to set the direction of where their service is headed. Whatever the future is, they're going to get there first. Certainly they won't get there playing 3rd wheel in the console industry.
Yes 1000%, but you missed the quotes around Xbox. PC gets Xbox content day and date, and the Xbox content everywhere strategy definitely applies to PC for what's left on the console especially if the rumors are true about the functionality of the next Xbox console. That console will complete the transition to making the Xbox console an expensive paperweight compared to a PC.The future of Xbox is pc and cloud.
And that's where you're wrong. Nintendo and PS will never be an xbox. It has no guarantees on content. Whether MS ports their titles to their console will always be a decision to be made. They are porting titles today, sure, for the population of gamers that will still buy these types of games, But it holds no guarantees for the future.Because it's a half truth. Everything is an Xbox, so we're bringing our content to those other devices you own like your Nintendo and Playstation consoles.
And the console market has dramatically shifted since then. There is no more competing for people, it's locked in now. Library lock in is real, this is why steam continues to trounce all other stores despite the fact that Epic has been giving away games and providing all sorts of incentives for developers to bring titles to their store.They didn't have a problem selling consoles during the Xbox 360 generation. There were plenty of exclusives and it was the lead development platform. With Xbox Series they bought up a bunch of studios and games to have the same exclusive pipeline and lead platform to drive console sales and drive up all variants of game pass. But they pivoted to putting that content everywhere instead. It's great for making money as long as the vacuum of the console sales stagnating (because now there's no value in the console) doesn't overtake those glorious MAU numbers.
If MS goes full third party I dont see why this wouldnt be possible. Sony was thinking of a partnership with Amazon a while ago iirc so its possible. I just dont see Sony doing it in the next decade though.Absolutely and MS would be all over that if Sony would let them!
MS already has data centers everywhere. It’s their core strategy. As per the graph above, Sony only has like 14% of the industry revenue, and while still being the leader by a significant deviations, they have very low margins on that revenue. It’s not a growth area for MS unless Sony is willing to give MS decent margins for gamepass and that is not likely to pass.I wonder if, in an economy of scale, at some point completely ditching the console hardware from R&D to marketing is more or less lucrative than switching to a game pass only on the competitor's console (including platform fee) and building data centers around the world filled with Xbox compatible hardware.
Spot on!MS already has data centers everywhere. It’s their core strategy. As per the graph above, Sony only has like 14% of the industry revenue, and while still being the leader by a significant deviations, they have very low margins on that revenue. It’s not a growth area for MS unless Sony is willing to give MS decent margins for gamepass and that is not likely to pass.
Sony is more likely to make their own sub service before adopting gamepass.
It would be harder for them than say Amazon and MS but considering the long term prospects and current trends I can see Sony investing in cloud computing infrastructure. MS has a huge advantage here BUT there's a huge trend moving to at least a hybrid approach away from relying on hyperscalers. The cost of compute has gone down significantly actually and considering Sony has a great software team and are not building general purpose software applications I dont see a reason for them to rely on hyperscalers. They can save by building out their own gaming cloud infrastructure actually at a minimum a hybrid approach.There cloud strategy will be a struggle for them. They can only borrow their infrastructure globally, which means margins on streaming will be less so they’ll need to get creative here on how to proceed.