ANova said:
As you can see, being on this list doesn't really mean shit, in pure English. One thing needed only: enough CPU for free or paid by somebody to slap together.
WTF is your point? You only confirmed what I said. Yes, I knew long ago IBM was working on a new Bluegene, however, it's still under development.
WTF is wrong with your brain?
Look, I know you aren't the sharpest on the block but please: try to catch basic logical context.
Besides this being here proves nothing but you can use it for very rare scientific purposes - which is prefectly fits into my assesment about the 70's mainframe style, in case you couldn't recognize.
According to whom? You? Because if that's the case then I know it's wrong.
According to anybody who is an expert or work as a professional in this industry.
You're neither of one, apparently only an ignorant home luzer, so no wonder if you can't sort it out...
FYI: Read the frikkin basics before you gotinvolved in a debate - you don't even know the fuckin basics, not even the terms.
64 bit is 64 bit. If you don't know WTF are the industry terms, learn them first.
They promised to deliver these, they did. Unlike the giant crappy Intel with 5-6 other thing.
Facts are facts, despite your taste, kid.
Ahaha. x86-64 is nowhere near as complex as IA-64.
Jesus in heaven... AND???????
You clearly utterly outsider here.
And yes, it is just an extension. What, exactly, did "giant crappy Intel" fail to deliver on besides the Tejas?
Prescott became the history most dissipating yet least powerful CPU which actually the first time almost tripled the tranny number but despite consuming 110W offered less performance than its own ancestor.
LOL! The world worst designed CPU, the biggest joke until today!
Itanium as the 'new' platform:
Intel technically did not sold anything from the "revolutionary design!
Itanium2: as the 'corrected' Itanium, which will REALLY PROVE what's TEH B0MB!
Proved that IA64 not only completely useless for today's general computin purposes but also sports a completely useless 32bit emulation mode!
The only adopters: like me, when Opteron wasn't available and you had 12-16 gigs of memory to address.
IA64:
the world BIGGEST WASTED EFFORT IN THE HISTORY OF THE CPUs! $10-20 BILLION BURNED AND YOU CAN'T EVEN MEASURE THEIR MARKETSHARE! The only co-member even STOPPED selling its workstations now... depite he still sells its own old *nix stuff![/b]
Without cache it's useless, if you have these crazy cache amounts (6MB, 9MB...) it's cost more than couple of machines from Opteron...
PS: I personally think HT was also a fuckup, though not for Intel but for us: unlike everybody else, Intel stands as the classic quick-and-useless approach ion this topic - there's a good chance you don't know WTF I'm talking about
, so feel free to ask or rather start reading here:
http://www.sun.com/processors/technologies.html or here:
http://java.ittoolbox.com/browse.asp?c=JAVAPeerPublishing&r=/pub/EH111402/article.html
Short history of MT:
http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~mark/multithreading.html
As you can see, there is much more in this HT-thingy than Intel did, than you know..
You either A) retarded or B) completely kookoo...
First you trashed AMD64 as non-real 64 (what a nonsense crap!) then you come back Intel couldn't fuck up because it's the copy of that.
What's wrong with you?
Not to mention the fact that you silently avoided the REAL reason I wrote it: Intels fully fucked up own 64bit extension. Not to mention they put EMT64 into Prescott - and we got a heating machin over 110W dissipation and SLOWER than the aging Northwood!!!
C'mon: it's gettin' embarrassing as you nare now trying to paint that black is white, Intel isn't a piece of crap since years now.
Fanboy style is one thing but it isn't necessary to make a complete idiot posts, believe me.
Well you've already proven yourself to be A) a f@nboy or B) dumb.
You said, "The last half dozen thing - own 64bit platform, Itaniums, Prescott, Tejas,
EMT64 - were completely fucked up at Intel."
Look...
if you can't follow a VERY BASIC context of a debate, STFU.
Last time:
Intel fucked up the way they designed them: useless, heat plant with a magnitude higher dissipation but less performance than its ancestor.
I know you're slow but enough is enough.
How can Intel fuck up EM64T when it is the
exact same instruction used by AMD. So, when AMD uses it, it's the greatest thing since sliced bread, when Intel uses it it's a fuck up.
Prescott didn't gain any heat from adding EM64T, Prescott always ran hot.
OMG.
You ... Jesus, you ARE really slow, indeed.
Prescott runs hot because of the 100+ million trannies which needed for its dead EMT64 and other, never exposed crap.
The worst design EVER.
If you don't know basic stuff, ask.
You keep claiming that my posts are embarassing or idiotic, yeah to a f@nboy like you maybe, not to anyone with some common sense.
Jesus, young Jedi: you don't even understand the topics you're trying to pretend you can post in something meaningful.
Go and finish some high school first, at least.
(I suggest to choose something "for mentally impaired"one...
).
You are clearly too slow to participate in these topics.
btw, your spelling and grammar continues to impress me.
We all know now you are pretty slow, so let me help you out, my little slo-bro:
I am not native English-speaking person.
Wow, suprising, ins't it huh?
It's my 2nd or 3rd or more language.
BTW it's fully OT.
