I don't even get how youguys read what hoom said in the articles. I only looked at the first one, but it did not in anyway suggest ATI will wish they had done it differently.
It seemed to say: "They spend a lot of effort keeping things secret, but it doesn't matter b/c they can't change things at this point anyway"
Of course it actually said:
That actually doesn't suggest ATI will wish they had done it differently. It suggests that learning what your rival is doing at some finite time before release will not change your chip unless you want to have "massive delays"
It seemed to say: "They spend a lot of effort keeping things secret, but it doesn't matter b/c they can't change things at this point anyway"
Of course it actually said:
You cannot change a GPU a year before release ...
The development of a GPU takes three to four years and despite the fact that Nvidia and ATI use so much secrecy, even if ATI learns about Nvidia's 2010 GPU, they won't be able to change their own 2010 chip, at least not without some massive delays.
That actually doesn't suggest ATI will wish they had done it differently. It suggests that learning what your rival is doing at some finite time before release will not change your chip unless you want to have "massive delays"