Help Canada!

Legion said:
Humus said:
Then what is it you're arguing really?


That the US' music industry is larger then that of Canadian industry.

I don't really think anyone can argue against that point.

I thought you meant that American artists are dominating music in other countries, which is clearly not the case.
 
As a very scientific effort :))), I checked my CD collection for nationalities, and here's the result:

GB: 32%
Sweden 25%
Latin America: 9%
France: 8%
Norway: 7%
USA: 7%
Canada: 5%
Ireland: 5%
Africa: 3%

Latin America and Africa didn't get sorted into individual countries, since I don't know exactly from where all of those groups came.
The high GB number surprised me. When I checked some artist that I was unsure of, a lot of them turned out to be britts. So I checked som of those I we're pretty certain off, and to my surprise, even more artists turned out to be britts.

But I wouldn't dare to say anything about other countries. I know it's often said that Swedes are over-represented in other countries (compared to the population of Sweden), but I don't know from own experience. And very often when people from USA and Canada talk about their favourite artists, I've never heard of them. So why wouldn't that work the other way too.

Since there's a specific USA/Canada question here, I'll add some info on those figures. If I only had counted the records that I actually listen to (ie not the ones that I got tired of within a week or two), then Canada would have a clear lead over USA. (Why, oh why did I for instance buy the Linkin Park CD? I plead temporary insanity.) But I admit that that hasn't got much to do with how big the record industry is, since I've already been fooled to buy it. :)
 
AlphaWolf said:
Legion said:
Humus said:
Then what is it you're arguing really?


That the US' music industry is larger then that of Canadian industry.

I don't really think anyone can argue against that point.

I thought you meant that American artists are dominating music in other countries, which is clearly not the case.

I was more refering to the over all size of the american industry.
 
Even though In N Out is a fast food chain, its burgers will win hands down against any McDonalds burger. That's not opinion, it's common sense. No statistics needed and it's not rocket science. There's probably 6 McDonalds for every In N Out in the US.
 
PC-Engine said:
Even though In N Out is a fast food chain, its burgers will win hands down against any McDonalds burger. That's not opinion, it's common sense. No statistics needed and it's not rocket science. There's probably 6 McDonalds for every In N Out in the US.


As i said McDonald's has been taking a hit for a while. But it didn't get to be number one without public support. Currently tehy excuse their failings as lack of advertising which i highly doubt is the reason. Honestly i attribute to the degredation of their product over the last ten years. However, i'd much rather see Pepsi go out of business then McDonald's.
 
Pepsi owns KFC the god of fast food. Id die without my weekly fix of that chicken... I hope to hell you're wrong legion! ;)
 
pax said:
Pepsi owns KFC the god of fast food. Id die without my weekly fix of that chicken... I hope to hell you're wrong legion! ;)

Can't live without your greasy chicken? :LOL: I absolutely detest KFC!
 
PC-Engine said:
Even though In N Out is a fast food chain, its burgers will win hands down against any McDonalds burger. That's not opinion, it's common sense. No statistics needed and it's not rocket science. There's probably 6 McDonalds for every In N Out in the US.


I like em both. Maybe In and Out a bit more.... but then I think I eat at McD's more often. What is wrong with me??


BAM! PORK FAT RULES!
 
As i said McDonald's has been taking a hit for a while. But it didn't get to be number one without public support. Currently tehy excuse their failings as lack of advertising which i highly doubt is the reason. Honestly i attribute to the degredation of their product over the last ten years. However, i'd much rather see Pepsi go out of business then McDonald's.

Actually, McDonald's is now looking a lot better since adopting more items for their menus and we all can agree novelty will get people through the door. Profits are up actually last time I looked.

Just thinking about KFC gives me diarrhea. I also despise KFC now.
 
pax said:
WTF KFC rules!... Damnit I hope this isnt a trend...


The only thing bad about KFC is that pepsi owns thems. I hate it when i can't order a coke and have to settle for that pepsi crap.
 
Willmeister said:
As i said McDonald's has been taking a hit for a while. But it didn't get to be number one without public support. Currently tehy excuse their failings as lack of advertising which i highly doubt is the reason. Honestly i attribute to the degredation of their product over the last ten years. However, i'd much rather see Pepsi go out of business then McDonald's.

Actually, McDonald's is now looking a lot better since adopting more items for their menus and we all can agree novelty will get people through the door. Profits are up actually last time I looked.

Just thinking about KFC gives me diarrhea. I also despise KFC now.

what do you mean "looking better"? That they are seeing an increase in sales or just their food looks better/there is a better selection.
 
pax said:
It was fed to me in my milk bottle no doubt... I think as soon as I could take solid food. :LOL:


Jesus....have you reported this to your doctor as a source of possible growth deformities?
 
pax said:
LOL... I know us chicken is fed 10x more hormones than canuckian chicken but jebus.

:rolleyes: I hear that one a lot yet i've seen any sound minded scientist ever report animal hormones have an effect on humans. Seems to me a rather ludicrous supposition.
 
pax said:
:LOL: Youre the one reporting growth deformities from eating chicken... I think its safe too.

I am more refering to the radiation and chemical waste stored within the chicken as forms of flavoring.
 
Back
Top