chaphack said:a product created from the ground up as a multiconsole one. SH2 looks exactly like SH3.
I was not aware that SH2 was multiplatform from the start, I thought the ports came later?
chaphack said:a product created from the ground up as a multiconsole one. SH2 looks exactly like SH3.
notAFanB said:Almasy said:chaphack said:a product created from the ground up as a multiconsole one. SH2 looks exactly like SH3.
I was not aware that SH2 was multiplatform from the start, I thought the ports came later?
I was talking about SC2 in that multiconsole bit. The other one was just another example of chap´s twisted ideas.
To be honest, I thought Shenmue (1) was pretty awful at exploiting PowerVR. Apart from the lack of MIP mapping (urgh!) AFAICS, they didn't even use modifier volumes to do the shadows.Paul said:I think those who say no, focus to much on a technical head to head when you should be comparing pro's and con's and the end result
Yea, end result if DC development had continued you wouldn't see anything come close to SH3. Your telling me the graphics would have doubled or maybe trippled from shenmue?
A lot of the DC's features still hadn't been used in the games when development went AWOL.But the ps2 is harder to program so the DC could have a big advantage having it's game optimized more to run more effieciently.
Sorry but efficiency can only make more efficient what the system already has, efficiency cannot add more features to the system.
A lot of the DC's features still hadn't been used in the games when development went AWOL.
Have you seen all the crap about untapped unmaxxed power? Some who thinks RC has SA level textures, some who think SC2 port looks similar on all system hence PS2 is similar to all system. The very same people who laughed off Lazy for supporting DC. Latest ex, @ 2nd coming of deferred rendering.How exactly does saying "PS2 is keeping up with Xbx/GCN" equate to PS2 having unlimited powers?
The fact that SC2 Xbox officially does support 720p, how is it made up? Ok, so i slipped that it does not support widescreen, but the resolution is still much higher, with added improvements in other areas. And it is a port of a PS2 game.you brought up and made up the especifics of a resolution that (720p), needless to say, wasn´t exact in the least and was brought up just to say that Xbox "destroys" PS2?
Crystal clear in relative to the image artifacting filled PS2, yes. How is it laughable?Also, I find the "cristal clear" comment quite laughable.
I already explained that in the other thread. Render reality is just one of the many ways to interprete it, Pshordes obviously are quick to interprete it as rendering realworld graphics. As it stands, it is a very open statement, while SuperCPU CGI renderer is officially stated in Sony PRs.but MS is allowed to say that its console is powerfull enough to render reality.
Since when did i say SC2 is the biggest evidence???? WHEN???? I could name better examples if i wanted to.. Xbox destroys PS2, and the biggest evidence is SC2 (based on a comment you swore you heard in some site),
Sorry, come again. It was a sys246(aka PS2) game.a product created from the ground up as a multiconsole one
....with improved polygon counts.SH2 looks exactly like SH3.
Are all PShordes like you? So damn sensitive to critism so as to brand them as hate? Pathetic.At least Lazy can come up with new ideas on how to hate on Sony,
Have you seen all the crap about untapped unmaxxed power? Some who thinks RC has SA level textures, some who think SC2 port looks similar on all system hence PS2 is similar to all system. The very same people who laughed off Lazy for supporting DC. Latest ex, @ 2nd coming of deferred rendering.
london-boy said:yep..... still feels like 2001 all over again.... with new screenshots...
With true discrete 5.1 in game audio, that supports more 2D/3D voices and higher sample rate, i say XB audio > PS2, more so than PS2<>DC.and to be honest, in terms of visuals and sound, there is a bigger gap between DC and PS2 than Ps2 and XBox
chaphack said:Hm, i might be wrong, but it seems some idiot is trying to hack my PC. And yes, B3D forums is my only IE page open currently. Should i send a reply?
Deadmeat you silly, PS2 is 25X the DC. Thanks to the latent emotion powers available in never done before mips cpu, the sheer quality of PS2 graphics outblast the DC and it does well keeping up with the GC/Xboxs' best games.
I am not saying that PS2 is inferior to DC, but the console lacks anti-aliasing, 60Hz (All Sega games have 60 hz options, even the PAL versions), decent use of colours (only a few games use bright colours, the rest is all grey, brown), textures are mostly ugly.
Well, its not me...chaphack said:Hm, i might be wrong, but it seems some idiot is trying to hack my PC. And yes, B3D forums is my only IE page open currently. Should i send a reply?
Your xbox vs. PS2 comments are not. Ehy do you bring xbox comparisons into every discussion, where they are absolutely irrelevant.
Didn't we get some moderators here recently, where are them? Plenty of them to deal with, considering this whole thread is full of stupid-ass comments like:
Quote:
Deadmeat you silly, PS2 is 25X the DC. Thanks to the latent emotion powers available in never done before mips cpu, the sheer quality of PS2 graphics outblast the DC and it does well keeping up with the GC/Xboxs' best games.
There are plenty of guys who probe my PC for open ports every day even if I am not running any Internet applications. How could you relate that to strictly to B3D forums ?
chaphack said:Your xbox vs. PS2 comments are not. Ehy do you bring xbox comparisons into every discussion, where they are absolutely irrelevant.
Trace back the topic, trace back the topic.
Another great irony to realise who was the first one who brought SC2 Xbox-PS2 comparison into this topic.