DeathKnight
Regular
How about not showing anything GT and forgoing wasting people's time?
Gameplay screenshots of GT:HD
- Thread starter kabacha
- Start date
Well they are perfectionist, so they might not like to show half-ass PS3 work of them...mckmas8808 said:
Showing total-ass GT:HD is better in a perverted way for them, sorta.I quote zed at the other thread about 1080p.DeathKnight said:
http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showpost.php?p=761688&postcount=44
zed said:
Last edited by a moderator:
mckmas8808
Legend
one said:Well they are perfectionist, so they might not like to show half-ass PS3 work of them...
So why didn they show GT5 cars last year? I actually thought showing the GT5 cars last year on a GT4 track was cool. They were showing progression like they did in the past. This time I was expecting to see like 4 GT5 cars (NO GT4 cars) on a GT4 track.
But instead we had to suffer watching stupid GT4 HD video.
I can't wait to see GT5 cars racing along side GT5 motorcycles.:smile:Was Motorstorm supposed to be part of the conference? I know it was late getting up and running (wasnt even ready until the next day). The GT:HD presentation really seemed like they were just killing time for whatever reason (aww, not another track Kaz!). I wonder if MoStorm's absence was a late minute change and they scrambled.
heh highly possible. I wouldnt find it strange. They spent too much time showing GT HD without any particular reason as if they were trying to extend the length of the conference or cover some gap of something. It was obvious journalists would have gotten bored with it.liverkick said:
I dont think Sony would have been so disorganized with their conference. They do rehearsals and pre-planning before they get live so everything will go as smooth as possible. They gave the impression they hastily planned the conference or something messed up with their schedule.
ihamoitc2005
Veteran
Plans
Original plans must be different is what I think about this because always Sony is very "slick" but this time they are like class-room presentation. Even warhawk presenter was very uncomfortable showing new controller because he did not land his ship very well. Maybe controller change is what made this problem or maybe something else.
predicate said:
Original plans must be different is what I think about this because always Sony is very "slick" but this time they are like class-room presentation. Even warhawk presenter was very uncomfortable showing new controller because he did not land his ship very well. Maybe controller change is what made this problem or maybe something else.
Mintmaster
Veteran
Okay, fine, it can get 60fps in Doom3:one said:
http://techreport.com/reviews/2004q4/geforce-6600gtagp/index.x?pg=4
Looking at other sites, it seems that most benchmarks are closer to the results you posted, but that's besides the point. A 7600GT is weaker than RSX, and can do 80fps at that resolution.
There's no fundamental reason that 1080p is undoable. The reason 1080p games will be rare or will look bad is because 1080p has twice the pixels as 720p. It's just not worth it.
There are some 1024x600 framebuffer grabs of PGR3... basically it's about blur.Laa-Yosh said:
http://www.gamekult.com/images/ME0000629972/
http://www.gamekult.com/images/ME0000629989/
http://www.gamekult.com/images/ME0000630054/
IIRC it was marketed as a GPU geared to Doom 3 acceleration but I didn't know it is that good, I should've bought it when it was out...Mintmaster said:
ihamoitc2005
Veteran
Pgr3
I feel best view for PGR3 is garage view. I like to walk around cars and see very amazing details. It is very beautiful. Racing view is ok but not so great.
GT:HD looks like GT4 but has very high resolution. I think this is good example of amazing GT4 graphics quality (with some improvements for lighting for spectators) but it does not have real next gen look.
one said:
I feel best view for PGR3 is garage view. I like to walk around cars and see very amazing details. It is very beautiful. Racing view is ok but not so great.
GT:HD looks like GT4 but has very high resolution. I think this is good example of amazing GT4 graphics quality (with some improvements for lighting for spectators) but it does not have real next gen look.
I think Polyphony shot themselves in the foot at E3 by showing GT:HD. People now think that GT5 is actually GT:HD and will look like a slightly prettier PS2 game, and are now counting on Forza 2 to deliver next-gen driving-game graphics, whereas actually if prior performance is anything to by GT5 will look absolutely phenomenal.
mckmas8808
Legend
predicate said:
Well the good thing is Polyphony has TGS (September) to show the real GT5. And Forza 2 is probably not going to be out by then.
scooby_dooby
Legend
mckmas8808 said:
The shocker for me was them stating they had just begun work on the next GT because they'd just finished Tourist Trophy.
If they're just beginning work now, does that mean we can't expect GT5 until late 2007 or early 2008? Yikes.
mckmas8808
Legend
Holiday 2007 is not that bad. That's one year after the release of the PS3.scooby_dooby said:
jonnyp said:
He said GT5 might come out a bit sooner than we're used to. I can think of two reasons for that, the most important being that when they made GT4 they did a lot of work in preparation for GT5 as well, apparently (I've been following that process really closely back then, witness a few of my columns for IGN Cars in that period).
But GT's release has been very unpredictable in the past, so I'm not going to speculate this time. Just echoing what the man himself said at E3.
That would make sense. If you're going to all the effort of modelling hundreds of cars, I can see reason to do high-end models and reduce to target hardware. The effort of creating high-res next-gen models should then be much reduced. Has Laa-Yosh got any input on the validty of this speculation?
Similar threads
