Did ATI hold back on R520 to make room for R580?

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by mrcorbo, Nov 3, 2005.

  1. ANova

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,226
    Likes Received:
    10
    Jen is all about the money, revenge comes second.
     
  2. Xenus

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2004
    Messages:
    1,316
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Ohio
    But revenge and money is twice as nice. It is the whole kick them while their down strategy. Nvidia can release a higher clocked part to get the performance crown. Thus allowing them to say they have the best card, which in turn transfers into better sales on their lower end parts.
     
  3. Arty

    Arty KEPLER
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,906
    Likes Received:
    55
    Isnt R580 the refresh of R520? (It doesnt have a refresh of its own)
     
  4. Pete

    Pete Moderate Nuisance
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    5,779
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Rather than drop R520 down a notch, isn't it more likely ATI will phase it out in favor of R580 and release a new, two quad GPU to fill in the gap b/w the currently single quad RVs and quadruple quad Rs? We've already seen it with X700 and 6600, a separate, mainstream/"performance" GPU.

    It's possible they'll go with a 4-5 GPU lineup (RV515, RV530, dual-quad, R520, R580), but I see RV515 ditched in favor of RV530 just as R520 will make way for R580. Then we'll see something in between at the $250-450 level, a dual-quad version of RV530/R580.

    Maybe that's too neat, but it does seem a lot simpler in terms of fab space/usage.

    As for R580 refreshes, I thought that was the end of the line WRT DX9.

    I'm done talking out of my butt, now.
     
  5. R300King!

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2002
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    5

    I think that price gap between $250 and $450 (or something like this) will be filled in January or Feburary. ATi will bring the price of the X1800XL down to $299 and the X1800XT to $399(256mb), $449(512mb) and will introduce the X1900XT(R580) ,and possible the XL, for $599 and $549 repectively.

    These are of course my predictions, but when Nvidia counters the X1800XT(and they will), ATi has the R580 "In house and working" for just that occasion.


    Predicted by me Oct. 6th. Let's see if I'm right. :)

    http://66.224.5.66/board/showpost.php?p=1333950620&postcount=33
     
    #85 R300King!, Nov 5, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 5, 2005
  6. ANova

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,226
    Likes Received:
    10
    I suspect an X1800 Pro and/or SE model will be coming.
     
  7. nagus

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    5
  8. CJ

    CJ
    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    816
    Likes Received:
    40
    Location:
    MSI Europe HQ
    Keep in mind that ATi had R590 on their roadmaps. This core was listed as "optional" and is supposedly R580 on a 80nm process. Doesn't 80nm also have low-k? If it does than R590 could very well be the refresh of R580 using higher clockspeeds, but cheaper to produce.

    Personally I expect R520 to continue besides R580 in a lower pricerange, until RV560 appears first with RV540 and RV505 coming a bit later (probably Q2/Q3'06).
     
  9. Ailuros

    Ailuros Epsilon plus three
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,511
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Chania
    If I take as granted that the R580 will have similar or slightly higher clockspeeds than R520, then I don't see the first being a clear winner over what the competition might have to offer against it.

    Furthermore I'm wondering whether ATI will in fact release a X1800XT PE with even higher frequencies, otherwise they might end up losing any so far advantage over the competition in terms of performance.
     
  10. BrynS

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    407
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    UK
    Are you able to flesh out those codenames (RV560, RV540, RV505) at all in terms of process and possible configuration?

    - RV540: 80nm die shrink (cost reduction) of RV530?
    - RV505: 80nm die shrink (cost reduction) of RV515?
    - RV560: 80nm die shrink (cost reduction) of R520 -- the X800XL of R5xx? Or perhaps a beefed-up RV530, i.e. maybe 8-1-3-2?

    Are my musings even close? :lol:

    EDIT: Clarity
     
    #90 BrynS, Nov 5, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 5, 2005
  11. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,093
    Likes Received:
    3,179
    Location:
    New York
  12. mrcorbo

    mrcorbo Foo Fighter
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,024
    Likes Received:
    2,851
  13. mrcorbo

    mrcorbo Foo Fighter
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,024
    Likes Received:
    2,851
  14. mrcorbo

    mrcorbo Foo Fighter
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,024
    Likes Received:
    2,851
    I don't get it. Is it such a good idea to bring this many different products to market in so short of a time. Especially with all of them becoming obsolete with DX10? How are they going to get rid of all that inventory.
     
  15. Jawed

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,729
    Likes Received:
    2,142
    Location:
    London
    Perhaps they're price-cut refreshes.

    Jawed
     
  16. SugarCoat

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    2,091
    Likes Received:
    52
    Location:
    State of Illusionism
    well Nvidia has shown you dont need highest end performance leadership to dominate in sales.

    I dont think the R580 will be out in anything less then 3 or 4 months. If ATI wants to drink up sales they can start by attacking Nvidia in the mid and mid-upper ranges.

    Not sure if this hasnt been posted in this thread yet, but i'd seriously kill any hopes of ATI launching this as a responce to the 512GTX.

    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2574
     
    #96 SugarCoat, Nov 5, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 5, 2005
  17. AlphaWolf

    AlphaWolf Specious Misanthrope
    Legend

    Joined:
    May 28, 2003
    Messages:
    9,471
    Likes Received:
    1,688
    Location:
    Treading Water
    They don't become obselete just because DX10 is released. They won't become obselete until games using DX10 as the base featureset are common. Which won't be for years.
     
  18. ondaedg

    Regular

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    1

    I agree with you one hundred percent. The point I am making is that ATI under no circumstances would hold back technology on a part about to be released especially when they are late to begin with. Publicly traded companies do not have this luxury unless they are king of their market. Stockholders will come after them with a vengeance.
     
  19. IbaneZ

    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    17
    And thats releated to this topic? :lol:

    One hit wonders.

    Sick of promises and Canuck BS. Where the f is my X1800XT?
     
  20. Sinistar

    Sinistar I LIVE
    Regular Subscriber

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    660
    Likes Received:
    74
    Location:
    Indiana
    Where did you order it from?
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...