its a shame that if an arm cpu is there that its not being used for the OS .
In the PS5 its used for other things when the console is active aswell? Like noted before the PS2 did this too, use the PSX chip for BC but also for audio/IO.
its a shame that if an arm cpu is there that its not being used for the OS .
So the presence of an ARM CPU is all but confirmed for the PS5.
I do not know how DF measured the 29w for stand-by mode, but Heise.de measured 0.5 w.
Dirt5: 160-165 Watt
normal use: 40-70 Watt
watching Blu-Ray: 60 Watt
Fast Boot: 10 Watt
Standby: 0.5 Watt
DF would be in on the first wave of consoles MS sent out to media considering the relationship they have with MS. Is it possible that models sent out later like the one being reviewed in this video are actual retail units and not prototypes? Maybe that's why we're seeing different numbers in standby mode?So DF unit was in idle dashboard not standby. Which makes a whole lot more sense.
The original purpose of the PS4 ARM chip was background updates so the difference may well attributed to moving to a more efficient processor design and moving from a mechanical HDD to a SSD.Possibly but still begs the question of how efficient the ARM core they are using. In later revision of PS4 Pro the standby mode with game resume enabled consumed 1.7W. That is with the RAM being supplied power, how are they achieving 0.5W on PS5?
Yes that makes way more sense, theres no way it would be 30W in standbyI do not know how DF measured the 29w for stand-by mode, but Heise.de measured 0.5 w.
Dirt5: 160-165 Watt
normal use: 40-70 Watt
watching Blu-Ray: 60 Watt
Fast Boot: 10 Watt
Standby: 0.5 Watt
Did they also claim dashboard on xbox was only 1080p, theres no way its gonna be that when it releases, it will be 4k like it should be
If you understand how OS works then it’s obvious why it can’t be, maybe start with system call?its a shame that if an arm cpu is there that its not being used for the OS .
If you understand how OS works then it’s obvious why it can’t be, maybe start with system call?
Unless you have a different definition of OS...
I see. That's more reasonable and indeed possible, and I think the touch bar MacBooks kinda already do that with the touch bar. But that maybe more restrictive and not worth the cost.you can simply have a light weight game os running on x64 and a media os for navigating the store , recording , friends stuff and switch between the two with display panes
I do not know how DF measured the 29w for stand-by mode, but Heise.de measured 0.5 w.
[...]
Fast Boot: 10 Watt
Standby: 0.5 Watt
From the article:
Deep Stand-By: 0,5W
Fast wake up mode: 9W