XSX pushing above 20% res over ps5 in counts taken. Kinda expected with specs
Both pushing locked FPS is amazing. The tech in Doom Eternal is insane incredible asset for MS 1st party. What will Doom Next look like
Current Generation Games Analysis Technical Discussion [2020-2021] [XBSX|S, PS5, PC]
- Thread starter Shortbread
- Start date
- Status
XSX pushing above 20% res over ps5 in counts taken. Kinda expected with specs
Both pushing locked FPS is amazing. The tech in Doom Eternal is insane incredible asset for MS 1st party. What will Doom Next look like
snc
Veteran
have too keep in mind that xsx also use vrsXSX pushing above 20% res over ps5 in counts taken. Kinda expected with specs
Both pushing locked FPS is amazing. The tech in Doom Eternal is insane incredible asset for MS 1st party. What will Doom Next look like
It's not quite that cut and dry with VRS, the real number of pixels is somewhere inbetween. That said I'm not surprised, clustered forward renderers are compute heavy and the xbox should excel in them (and any other suitably modern rendering technique)
VRS makes sense now. All the other videos made as if both PS5 and XBSX resolution differences were very minor. Seeing XBSX maintaining a higher overall resolution with an almost perfect 60fps/120fps modes is great. PS5 gamers should be satisfied with great performance and overall cleaner image quality. A win for both platforms.
Have you met console gamers?
snc
Veteran
Yeah hard to notice without zooming same as 15-29% pixel difference
This is what I meant when I said may get higher general resolution with VRS on XSX as fps seemed to be pretty locked.
The question is side by side comparison, which gives the better overall IQ.
My expectation is that the XSX should be if VRS is working as publicised.
PS5 still giving a strong showing, possibly stronger than XSX all things considered.
The question is side by side comparison, which gives the better overall IQ.
My expectation is that the XSX should be if VRS is working as publicised.
PS5 still giving a strong showing, possibly stronger than XSX all things considered.
Probably higher resolution textures, also would be less asset cache size required to help accommodate it.
But memory is what I put the lack of RT on XSS down to.
So for Doom Eternal thanks to @VGA (VGTech on Youtube) we now have uncompressed, not scaled 
, and identical screenshots for the balanced and RT modes (pics show different scenes for the 120hz mode) and we can finally see the effect of VRS on XSX.
Balanced mode, both running at 2160p, image looks a bit softer on XSX, the vaseline effect is more pronounced in darker areas.
PS5 (up), XSX (down):
RT mode, both running at 1800p, same thing than the balanced mode, many textures have more details on PS5, again the difference is more noticeable in somber areas but also in some brighter areas like this one:
PS5 (up), XSX (down):
We can say that when both versions run at the same resolution, the game appears slightly sharper, with more texture details, on PS5.
, and identical screenshots for the balanced and RT modes (pics show different scenes for the 120hz mode) and we can finally see the effect of VRS on XSX.Balanced mode, both running at 2160p, image looks a bit softer on XSX, the vaseline effect is more pronounced in darker areas.
PS5 (up), XSX (down):
RT mode, both running at 1800p, same thing than the balanced mode, many textures have more details on PS5, again the difference is more noticeable in somber areas but also in some brighter areas like this one:
PS5 (up), XSX (down):
We can say that when both versions run at the same resolution, the game appears slightly sharper, with more texture details, on PS5.
Aligns with the specs indeed, seems a very well coded game taking advantage of hardwares.
Lol. True though, its not the 6th gen days anymore.
Not all that suprising seeing this was running with top end graphics for the gen on PS4/Xone at 60fps. Most games pushing that kind of visuals where sitting around 30fps.
So for Doom Eternal thanks to @VGA (VGTech on Youtube) we now have uncompressed, not scaled
Balanced mode, both running at 2160p, image looks a bit softer on XSX, the vaseline effect is more pronounced in darker areas.
PS5 (up), XSX (down):
RT mode, both running at 1800p, same thing than the balanced mode, many textures have more details on PS5, again the difference is more noticeable in somber areas but also in some brighter areas like this one:
PS5 (up), XSX (down):
We can say that when both versions run at the same resolution, the game appears slightly sharper, with more texture details, on PS5.
Any comparisons for when X is running at a higher resolution, but not at max? That's more interesting to see the VRS tradeoffs vs VRS / resolution gains side by side. Currently both consoles are hard constrained to the max so the PS5 will show up better.
Last edited:
Kugai Calo
Regular
This would be some of the earliest proper VRS implementations we have seen. We can tell it's doing exactly what's advertised - performance gain at no cost of viewing experience. Although in this case I would speculate that in some scenes there's still computational resource headroom left on both machines, but for an overall balanced experience the VRS pass stays on anyways.
I would still love to see someone with the equipments measuring the power consumption of both machines while playing cross-platform games. I think that will give us a good insight of the hardware's actual utilization.
I would still love to see someone with the equipments measuring the power consumption of both machines while playing cross-platform games. I think that will give us a good insight of the hardware's actual utilization.
VRS is something really fitting for consoles imo, DF/Alex mentioned this two years ago already.
Kugai Calo
Regular
It would be lovely if those who make framerate videos also put a power draw graph along side the framerate graph.The only thing we have are figures for WD: L and Dirt 5.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
