Came across some Bitcoin mining results : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=57410.0
Check out those chip undervolting results with memory underclocking... DAYUM! Looks almost like AMD won't need to drop the clocks a lot for the dual card - just bin carefully and use lower stock voltage...
PS. If you read the thread further, to around 7th page, you might understand why the 7970's are out of stock.
Seems Tom's Hardware screwed up.Seems Tahiti needs a new miner to unlock its potential - http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-7970-benchmark-tahiti-gcn,3104-14.html
Seems Tom's Hardware screwed up.
In that bitcoin forum thread they get 550-600 MHash/s @stock from a HD7970, not only ~415 like Tom's.
There's nothing fuzzy about:The mining craze is really confusing. Fixed payouts shared across the network and a constant scramble for faster hardware so you don't get left behind. That's some pretty fuzzy math.
In OpenCL, you can get the program binary back from the runtime, but, as yet, there are no (public) tools to decode the ISA for HD7970.I wonder if there'll be a version of SKA (or similar tool) that shows GCN-specific compilation...
Or maybe a way to dump the compiled kernel from the runtime?
Difficulty = network size (effectively - difficulty is a function of a smoothed "moving average" of network size).They use estimates of $1000 in hardware costs per giga hash over two years. Estimates of electricity and bandwidth costs are thrown in as well. I don't see how that measure can be even close to accurate without factoring in difficulty and network size.
Difficulty = network size (effectively - difficulty is a function of a smoothed "moving average" of network size).
Browse around and you will see lots of interesting stuff on that site that backs-up that graph.
Oh yes, I was never trying to suggest everyone is profiting to the same extent or that it's guaranteed. If you're mining with a Pentium IV then you're definitely in the "losing" campUnderstood. However it means that a given individual is screwed as the network grows since revenue (in bitcoins) is fixed regardless of network size. Aggregate capital and operating costs also increase, reducing overall profit margins. Now consider that some miners are far more productive than others and it's clear that there are many "losers" in this game. I'm looking at this purely from a personal enrichment standpoint.
There is already.I wonder if there'll be a version of SKA (or similar tool) that shows GCN-specific compilation...
Or maybe a way to dump the compiled kernel from the runtime?
The dissassembler is actually integrated in the aticaldd.dll togther with the compiler. One just needs to call it on the binary (which isn't well documented). That's how I got some ISA code for GCN half a year ago.In OpenCL, you can get the program binary back from the runtime, but, as yet, there are no (public) tools to decode the ISA for HD7970.
That graph does hide something like two orders of magnitude variation in the price of bitcoin. So reference to "revenue (in bitcoins) is fixed regardless of network size" is kinda missing the underlying action
If they indeed release XTX it most likey be called HD7980.
Similar HD4870 to HD4890 transition of higher clocks.