Huh? I might remember wrong, but didn't it occupy pretty much 3 of 4 sides of the die?Relative to the rest of the I/O (PCIe, display, etc.) the HBM phy padding looks quite large, but after all this is a ~600 mm² die. The Hawaii's low-power 512-bit interface could probably occupy less area.
I said "probably", since there's no die-shot of Hawaii released, only of Tonga that uses the same phy interfacing.Huh? I might remember wrong, but didn't it occupy pretty much 3 of 4 sides of the die?
Maybe I mixed Hawaii & Tahiti indeedI said "probably", since there's no die-shot of Hawaii released, only of Tonga that uses the same phy interfacing.
The case you're referring is Tahiti, I guess?
Is Hawaii's interfaces really specifically "low power", though? As I recall the way it was described was simply re-purposing tahiti's old, lower-speed memory controllers.The Hawaii's low-power 512-bit interface could probably occupy less area.
Is Hawaii's interfaces really specifically "low power", though? As I recall the way it was described was simply re-purposing tahiti's old, lower-speed memory controllers.
AMD stated Hawaii's 512bit memory interface was 20% smaller in die area than Tahiti's 384bit memory interface, but reference memory speeds dropped from 1500Mhz to 1250Mhz.
AMD stated Hawaii's 512bit memory interface was 20% smaller in die area than Tahiti's 384bit memory interface, but reference memory speeds dropped from 1500Mhz to 1250Mhz.
Right, not Tahiti. Like, Cayman, wasn't it? All these codenames are getting difficult to differentiate.AMD stated Hawaii's 512bit memory interface was 20% smaller in die area than Tahiti's 384bit memory interface, but reference memory speeds dropped from 1500Mhz to 1250Mhz.
Well, looks like the HBM phy is just about the same area as the Tonga's 6-channel GDDR5 interface.
And why did it take more than a year for them to introduce a high volume SKU with all shaders enabled?Why does AMD not enable the full gddr interface on tonga?
That is why it would be nice to have die shots of new revisions as well.Again: the speeds went back to 1500MHz in the R9 390 series.
Probably not worth the increased card complexity. 3 GB would be sweet spot capacity, but nowadays 4 is gonna sell even better.Why does AMD not enable the full gddr interface on tonga?
I'm thinking doing so would put it too close to the R390 in performance.Why does AMD not enable the full gddr interface on tonga?
The difference in performance should be pretty large, since Tonga doesn't clock very high and there's still a big difference in some areas like fillrate.I'm thinking doing so would put it too close to the R390 in performance.