D
My apologies, I didn't realize you were so new here. I'm John Hayden but I go by digitalwanderer around the web. Feel free to call me Dig, Digi, Digisan, John, Shit-for-Brains, or whatever. Very nice to meet you.Just pre-order one.
There are already some games that show noticeable gains on 6-core and 8-core i7 over higher clocked 4-core i7. But most curren gen games still favor higher clocked quad. For current gen games, a 4.2 GHz quad is (and will likely continue to be) a slightly better choice than 3.6 GHz 8-core. But 8-core will of course be more future proof. Cheaper 6-core and 8-core chips mean that more gamers will have them. Intel's Coffee Lake also has 6-core mainstream i7 models. More incentive for developers to optimize their engines for larger parallelism. DX12 and Vulkan also helps.Could These 8 core Ryzen cpus be even more futureproof in the long run than a higher clocked quadcore i7?
How likely is it that the next generation of console games might be utilizing more than 8 threads? Multithreading drawcalls in vulkan/dx12 could help. Could PS5/Xbox4 support over 8 threads or would that be unlikely due to chip size/heat and other software development side issues?
.....According to ComputerBase, the AMD B350 chipset does support multi-GPU, but only through CrossFire. There is no SLI support. This information is still under NDA despite new motherboards and Ryzen CPUs being available for preorders. I know B350 is the budget-oriented chipset, so multi-GPU is may not be as popular as it will be on X370, but I think it’s worth to know this beforehand.
I’ve decided to provide some recommendations on DDR4 limitations concerning AM4 currently.
As it stands the AMD code has restricted RAM tuning options which means many RAM kits at launch will not be compatible. This is the same for our competitors also.
What we recommend is the following:
If fully populating a system with 4 DIMMs (2DPC), use memory up to a max of 2400MHz.
If using 1DPC (2 DIMMs) ensure they are installed in A2/B2 and use memory up to max of 3200MHz.
The indication I have received from HQ is that AMD has focused all their efforts on CPU performance so far and will release updated code in 1~2 months when we expect improved DDR4 compatibility and performance.”
In short if filling all 4 DIMM’s set your speed to 2400MHz and work up from there.
If using 2 DIMM’s put them in the A2/B2 slots and a max of 3200MHz should be possible.
In our testing only the Crosshair board achieved 3000-3200MHz, the others were in the 2400-2666MHz range.
There are already some games that show noticeable gains on 6-core and 8-core i7 over higher clocked 4-core i7. But most curren gen games still favor higher clocked quad. For current gen games, a 4.2 GHz quad is (and will likely continue to be) a slightly better choice than 3.6 GHz 8-core. But 8-core will of course be more future proof. Cheaper 6-core and 8-core chips mean that more gamers will have them. Intel's Coffee Lake also has 6-core mainstream i7 models. More incentive for developers to optimize their engines for larger parallelism. DX12 and Vulkan also helps.
Lower clocked 8-core is significantly more power efficient than higher clocked 4-core. For example: 8-core 2.1 GHz Xeon D is 45W, while 4-core 4.0 GHz Skylake i7 is 91W. Both have similar theoretical peak multi-core throughput. I would expect that next gen consoles (PS5/XB4) will have at least 8 cores, and possibly more. AMD also has SMT now, so 16+ threads is highly probable. Cores will also certainly be faster (higher clock rate and/or higher IPC). I would expect 8-core PC CPUs to become more important for gaming when next console generation launches.
There's no Intel price cuts...wccftech still full of shit...those are Microcenter's prices and have been for a while... nothing to see folks.
On March 2 IIRCWhen can we expect reviews for Ryzen?
Yes official release date, NDA expiry and review release is March 2ndWhen can we expect reviews for Ryzen?
Looking at recent rumors about Intel trying to sabotage AMD I was thinking, independently of the true of the rumor, what can AMD do to prevent this to happen again? would AMD have a plan this time to not let this happen?
The problem with rumors is just that: they are not confirmed. but here is a link of an(supposedly) IT Director:The rumors I've been hearing is about sending e-mails to reviewers asking for specific benchmarks/games to be included in the review. They will also probably be asking reviewers to include in the comparison the revised pricing schemes that have started to appear (which still put AMD offerings in a much better light to be honest).
The problem with Intel is that reviewers have little to gain in putting Intel in a better light. Intel has been on the top for too many years and their subsequent leniency has made them boring.
Launching a news piece and/or review claiming that AMD finally beats the competition is a noteworthy news story that gives lots of clicks. A story about Intel beating the competition is not.
So unless Intel is sending money to these people, there's not a whole lot they can do this time.