Navi 21 was not successor of Navi 10. Your comparison is totally skewed. Navi 21 was MUCH bigger and MUCH more expensive chip which had over TWICE the area and much more than twice the mfg cost.
Navi 22 was the successor of Navi 10.
Navi 21 was not successor of Navi 10. Your comparison is totally skewed. Navi 21 was MUCH bigger and MUCH more expensive chip which had over TWICE the area and much more than twice the mfg cost.
Navi 22 was the successor of Navi 10.
Bondrewd
Veteran
N23 really, given the initial SRP was like what, $379? Not far off $399 of N10.
Man from Atlantis
Veteran
They could just try a working card's cooler on a hot junction card?
Yep, no idea why der8auer didn't, he had both.
https://videocardz.com/newz/thousan...s-could-be-affected-by-110c-gpu-hotspot-issue
could be a thousands of cards affected by hotspot issue...
could be a thousands of cards affected by hotspot issue...
Bondrewd
Veteran
20.5TF@100W at N6 versus 61TF@355W at N5 for N31, roughly the same clks and all.
yay, there you go, that's how RDOA3 is supposed to work.
Bondrewd
Veteran
Frenetic Pony
Veteran
Looks good for laptop clocks (2.3/2.5ghz)
20% higher performance(? scaling ?) on desktop version might be 3060 ti/3070 performance (variation from game to game). Depending on price it could be a good deal, $349 seems like a real sweetspot.
20% higher performance(? scaling ?) on desktop version might be 3060 ti/3070 performance (variation from game to game). Depending on price it could be a good deal, $349 seems like a real sweetspot.
Bondrewd
Veteran
Make it 329.
Silent_Buddha
Legend
So, that should make it faster than the 6700 M while consuming ~33% less power. Perhaps close to 6800 M while consuming ~38% less power?
Regards,
SB
Regards,
SB
Bondrewd
Veteran
Yessir.
Same wattage, same CU count, same niche parts are those.
hurleybird
Newcomer
The real question, of course, is drivers.
Is AMD BSing us like they did with N31 by assuming the drivers will be up to snuff by the time the parts launch? Or have they learned their lesson and are now being more conservative and/or only communicating what they for sure know they can achieve?
After the N31 fiasco, it's hard to not look at these slides with error bars going in both directions.
Is AMD BSing us like they did with N31 by assuming the drivers will be up to snuff by the time the parts launch? Or have they learned their lesson and are now being more conservative and/or only communicating what they for sure know they can achieve?
After the N31 fiasco, it's hard to not look at these slides with error bars going in both directions.
Similar threads
